ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0551

Medical Cannabis Use by Rheumatology Patients According to Inflammatory versus Non-Inflammatory Condition

kevin boehnke1, Tristin Smith1, Ying He1, marc martel2, david williams1 and Mary-Ann Fitzcharles3, 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2McGill University, Montréal-Ouest, Canada, 3McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: pain, Therapy, complementary

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Abstracts: Exemplary Interprofessional Research

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Persistent pain and poor sleep are common symptoms experienced by patients with rheumatic diseases. Medical cannabis (MC) may offer symptomatic relief and is increasingly accessible to patients. Recent recreational cannabis legalization in many United State (US) states and Canada has opened this access gateway for patients who may be using MC with physician oversight or by self-administration. Improved understanding of the current MC culture will facilitate empathetic patient centered care. The objective of this survey was to characterize MC use amongst rheumatology patients in the US and Canada and to understand demographic and clinical differences between those with inflammatory versus non inflammatory rheumatic conditions.

Methods: Partnering with the Arthritis Foundation (US) and the Arthritis Society (Canada), we investigated MC use by persons self reporting a rheumatic condition via an online anonymous survey. We categorized 797 survey participants who currently use MC for symptom treatment as having an inflammatory (n=441) or non-inflammatory (n=356) rheumatic condition. Excluded were those under 18, residing outside the US or Canada, not fluent in English or French, without a rheumatic condition, who failed to provide consent or did not complete the survey. Symptom burden was assessed using the 2011 Fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria and the PROMIS Global Health (v1.2) instrument, with physical and mental health scores converted to respective t-scores for analysis. Symptom change was assessed using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from very much worse to very much better. R (version 4.1.1) was used for statistical analyses.

Results: Participants were predominantly white females, with some education beyond high school, and about 1/3 were employed (Table 1). Both groups reported high symptom burden with the inflammatory group reporting higher FM scores (p< 0.0001) and lower PROMIS physical (p< 0.0001) and mental health (p=0.0011) scores despite being younger on average (p< 0.0001) (Table 1). Both groups reported moderate symptom relief across all domains, with greater improvements in joint stiffness and global health for the inflammatory group compared to the non-inflammatory group (Figure 1, p< 0.05). Respondents also reported substantial medication substitution across prescription drug classes related to MC use (Figure 2). Notably, over half of participants who used opioids (51.9%), SNRIs (64.0%), SSRIs (68.0%), gabapentinoids (67.3%), and sleeping pills (69.4%) reported discontinuing these medications entirely as a result of MC substitute. No significant differences were observed between the two groups within any of these prescription medication classes.

Conclusion: High symptom burden is likely a driver for MC use by persons with both inflammatory and non-inflammatory rheumatic conditions. The substantial symptom relief and reported reduction or discontinuation of prescribed symptomatic treatments warrants formal study.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Demographic and clinical characteristics of medicinal cannabis users by diagnosed condition: Current use classified as individuals who currently use medicinal cannabis to manage pain or other symptoms. Differences between diagnosis group were assessed using Chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Higher values for FM scores are indicative of more severe fibromyalgia symptoms, whereas higher PROMIS scores demonstrate greater physical and mental health.

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: k. boehnke, Tryp therapeutics; T. Smith, None; Y. He, None; m. martel, Sant cannabis; d. williams, Swing therapeutics; M. Fitzcharles, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

boehnke k, Smith T, He Y, martel m, williams d, Fitzcharles M. Medical Cannabis Use by Rheumatology Patients According to Inflammatory versus Non-Inflammatory Condition [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/medical-cannabis-use-by-rheumatology-patients-according-to-inflammatory-versus-non-inflammatory-condition/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/medical-cannabis-use-by-rheumatology-patients-according-to-inflammatory-versus-non-inflammatory-condition/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology