ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1204

Measuring the Effectiveness of Patient Education of Patients Receiving Injectable Biologic Medications

Victoria Ruffing1, Ana-Maria Orbai2 and Clifton O. Bingham III3, 1Medicine JHAAC, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 2Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 3Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biologics

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Education Poster (ARHP): Education/Community Programs

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Injectable
biologic medications have become part of the routine treatment rheumatoid
arthritis (RA), and other inflammatory arthritides. These
medications are associated with potentially serious
risks. Patients must receive adequate education on disease states,
medication administration, common and side effects, and when to contact a
health care professional with problems. Aim:
Examine
the sources from which information concerning biological drug safety is
obtained by patients. Identify specific knowledge gaps concerning biologic drug
administration and crucial aspects of safety

Methods: Surveys
were administered to a random group of patients receiving injectable
biological therapies and seen at 2 different clinical settings. We captured
basic demographics, disease characteristics, and current and past biologics
used. We assessed the type, and method of education received regarding drugs
and disease, satisfaction with education, and the level of retained medical
knowledge concerning critical aspects of injectable biologics. Questions
covered injection technique, storage and handling, side effects, signs of
infection, and what to do for elective surgery.  Questions were asked
using Visual Analog Scales (VAS), Likert scales, with additional comments recorded.
Frequencies were compared using Chi-square (X2) tests.  We
calculated odds ratios of satisfactory medication safety knowledge (answered
all questions correctly) using logistic regression adjusted for demographics
(age, sex, race). 

Results: Table
1.  Participants correctly identified appropriate
injection sites, technique, and storage and handling of biologics 100% of the
time.  There was considerable variability in knowledge concerning basic
aspects of relevance to biologic safety.  Among the overall group 30% were
unable to correctly answer all 4 knowledge questions concerning biologic safety
issues related to infections, elective surgery, and when to contact the
rheumatologist.   Level of education (≤HS vs >HS) was not
associated with medication safety knowledge (X2 1.05, p=0.31).
Patients who had received their education from a nurse were more likely to
answer all questions correctly (X2 8.20, p<0.01).  Safety
knowledge was significantly associated with receiving biologic education from a
nurse (OR 8.9, 95%CI 1.9, 42.4, p=0.006) after adjustment for demographic
characteristics.

Conclusion: Critical
gaps in knowledge exist regarding safe use of biologics. HCPs bear
responsibility for educating patients about the safety aspects of biologic
medications. In this small study, education provided by a nurse was associated
with greater knowledge by patients.  Further study is needed to identify
the optimal methods of delivering patient education that will be applicable
across care settings and to develop a standardized patient curriculum.

Table 1  

Covariates

Patients per group (n)

OR

95%  CI

p-value

RN

  No (ref)

23

  Yes

25

42.9

3.2-575.9

0.005

Sex

  Male (ref)

6

  Female

42

1.7

0.2-19

0.65

Ethnicity

  African-American (ref)

6

  Caucasian

39

83.5

1.8-3974

0.03

  Hispanic

3

8.2

0.1-578

0.33

Education

  HS or less (ref)

22

  More than HS

26

0.5

0.1-4

0.5

Arthritis type

  Other (ref)

16

  Rheumatoid

32

0.1

0.0-1

0.07

First biologic

   No (ref)

13

   Yes

35

1.1

0.1-8.8

0.9


Disclosure: V. Ruffing, None; A. M. Orbai, None; C. O. Bingham III, Janssen R & D, LLC, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ruffing V, Orbai AM, Bingham CO III. Measuring the Effectiveness of Patient Education of Patients Receiving Injectable Biologic Medications [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/measuring-the-effectiveness-of-patient-education-of-patients-receiving-injectable-biologic-medications/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/measuring-the-effectiveness-of-patient-education-of-patients-receiving-injectable-biologic-medications/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology