ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 461

Maximal Improvement in Fatigue Lags Behind Achievement of Sustained Remission in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Melissa Holdren1, Orit Schieir 2, Susan J. Bartlett 3, Louis Bessette 4, Gilles Boire 5, Glen Hazlewood 6, Carol Hitchon 7, Edward Keystone 8, Diane Tin 9, Carter Thorne 10, Vivian Bykerk 11, Janet Pope 12 and Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) Investigators 13, 1The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 2University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 5Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 6University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 7University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada, 8Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 9Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Canada, 10Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada, 11Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, 12Western University, London, ON, Canada, 13Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) Study, Toronto, Canada

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: fatigue and Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Risk Factors, Predictors, & Prognosis

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Up to 80% of rheumatoid arthritis patients report clinically relevant fatigue. Fatigue is a complex multi-factorial process that can result in adverse affects on patients’ physical and emotional well-being. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between disease activity and fatigue over time in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA).

Methods: Data were from patients with ERA (symptoms ≤ 12 months) enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH). CATCH participants completed repeat clinical assessments, laboratory investigations and self-reported questionnaires including rating their fatigue over the past week using a 0-10 point numerical rating scale (NRS). Fatigue severity was classified as low (≤2); moderate ( >2 but < 5) and high (≥5) based on other published RA studies. T-tests and repeated measures ANOVA were used to compare differences in fatigue in patient who did vs. did not achieve a low disease state using ESR (DAS28 ≤ 3.2) or REM (DAS28 < 2.6) within 3-months of cohort entry. Paired t-tests were used to compare fatigue at different time points in patients achieving remission (DAS < 2.6) at three or more consecutive visits within the first year of follow-up.

Results: Of the 1864 patients included, 1640 (88%) met ACR criteria for RA, 1342 (72%) were women and most had moderate-high baseline disease activity with a mean (SD) DAS28 of 4.9 (1.5). Fatigue was common with 19% reporting moderate and 59% high fatigue at baseline. Patients who reported low fatigue severity by three months continued to have significantly lower fatigue throughout follow-up compared to those with moderate or high fatigue (p< 0.001). Patients who achieved DAS28 REM or LDA within 3-months of cohort entry (N=539) had significantly lower mean fatigue throughout 5 years of follow-up compared to those who did not achieve REM or LDA within 3 months (p< 0.001) (Figure 1). Patients who achieved sustained remission in the first 3-months of cohort entry (N=236) had significantly decreased fatigue at time of first achieving DAS REM and 6 months after initially achieving DAS REM (Figure 2). Patients who first achieved sustained remission after 6-months of cohort entry (N= 141) had significantly decreased fatigue at both 3 and 6-months after cohort entry as well as 6-months after the first time in DAS REM (Figure 3).

Conclusion: Fatigue is common in ERA and is significantly decreased at time of first remission in those with sustained remission within the first year of diagnosis. Maximal improvement in fatigue lags behind with further improvement in fatigue seen 6 months after first remission. Early treatment response within 3-months was associated with short and long-term improvements in fatigue over time. This may have implications for counselling patients.


Figure 1

Figure 1. Differences in fatigue scores over time in ERA patients comparing patients in DAS28-ESR- REM or LAD to patients in DAS28-ESR- MDA or HDA at 3 months.
DAS28-ESR-: disease activity score in 28 joints using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate; REM: remission; LDA: low disease activity; MDA: moderate disease activity; HDA: high disease activity.


Figure 2r

Figure 2. Change in fatigue over time in patients achieving sustained remission -DAS <2.6- from months 3 to 9 -N=236-.


Figure 3r

Figure 3. Change in fatigue over time in patients achieving sustained remission -DAS <2.6- from months 6 to 12 -N=141-.


Disclosure: M. Holdren, None; O. Schieir, None; S. Bartlett, Abbie, 2, Abbvie, 2, 5, Bayer, 5, International Society of QOL Research, 6, Janssen, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, Merck, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, Pfizer Inc, 8, PROMIS International, 6, UCB, 5, 8; L. Bessette, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB Pharma, AbbVie Inc, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Novartis., 2, 5, 8, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Merck, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 2, 5; G. Boire, Abbvie, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Merck, 2, 8, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8; G. Hazlewood, None; C. Hitchon, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2, UCB Canada, 2; E. Keystone, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 5, Astra-Zeneca, 5, Biotest, 5, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Celltrion, 5, Crescendo, 5, Crescendo Bioscience, 5, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, 2, 5, 8, Genentech, 5, Genentech Inc., 5, Genzyme, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi-Aventis, 2, 8, UCB, 5, 8; D. Tin, None; C. Thorne, Abbvie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, CaREBiodam, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, Centocor, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, Medexus/Medac, 5, 8, Merck, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5; V. Bykerk, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, Brainstorm Therapeutics, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Genentech, 5, Gilead, 5, NIH, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, Regeneron, 5, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, 5, Sanofi, 5, Sanofi/Genzyme-Regeneron, 5, Sanofi-Genzyme/Regeneron, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, Scipher, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, The Cedar Hill Foundation, 9, UCB, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5; J. Pope, AbbVie, 5, Abbvie, 5, Actelion, 5, Actellion, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, Astra-Zeneca, 2, Bayer, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Eicos Sciences, 5, Eli Lilly & Company, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, EMERALD, 5, Emerald, 5, Genzyme, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, Merck, 2, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5, Seattle Genetics, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 8; C. (CATCH) Investigators, Amgen, 2, Pfizer Canada, 2, AbbVie Corporation, 2, Medexus Inc., 2, Eli Lilly Canada, 2, Merck Canada, 2, Sandoz Canada Biopharmaceuticals, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Holdren M, Schieir O, Bartlett S, Bessette L, Boire G, Hazlewood G, Hitchon C, Keystone E, Tin D, Thorne C, Bykerk V, Pope J, (CATCH) Investigators C. Maximal Improvement in Fatigue Lags Behind Achievement of Sustained Remission in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/maximal-improvement-in-fatigue-lags-behind-achievement-of-sustained-remission-in-early-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/maximal-improvement-in-fatigue-lags-behind-achievement-of-sustained-remission-in-early-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology