ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1285

Markers of Non-Compliance with ASAS/EULAR Management Recommendations Among Early Spa Patients: Evidence over 3 Years in the DESIR Cohort

Stephanie Harvard1,2, Daphne Guh3, Nick Bansback4, Maxime Dougados5, Aslam H. Anis6 and Bruno Fautrel7,8, 1School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2GRC08, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris, France;, Paris, France, 3St. Paul's Hospital, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Medicine Faculty, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, UPRES-EA 4058, Cochin Hospital, Rheumatology B, Paris, France, 6School of Population and Public Health, Univ of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7GRC08, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris, France, Paris, France, 8AP-HP, Rheumatology Dept, Pitié Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France;, Paris, France

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and guidelines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Health Services Research Poster II (ACR): Healthcare Access, Patterns of Medication Use and Workforce Considerations

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: We previously published quantitative definitions of the ASAS AS management recommendations designed for use with observational data.1 The definitions, developed by consensus with expert rheumatologists, are comprised of one or more clinical actions considered to be markers of ‘non-compliance with’ ASAS recommendations. The DESIR cohort, a longitudinal study of early SpA patients, provides 3 years of observational data suitable for measuring non-compliance according to these definitions.

Methods: We used DESIR cohort data to describe the number of patients with markers of non-compliance at each of 6 follow-up visits (months 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36) and at any point over 3 years. We calculated the number of patients with any marker of non-compliance; any ‘core’ marker of non-compliance (i.e., markers applicable to all patients at all times); any marker of non-compliance minus that pertaining to physiotherapy (for which consensus was not achieved); the number of follow-up visits at which patients had at least one marker of non-compliance; and the total number of markers of non-compliance in each patient at each visit. Non-compliance pertaining to anti-TNF agents was analyzed among patients satisfying ASAS criteria for anti-TNF agents. The analysis included all DESIR patients who satisfied ASAS criteria for axial SpA.

Results: A total of 486 patients satisfied ASAS criteria for axial SpA and were included in the analysis. The most frequently observed marker of non-compliance pertained to lack of physiotherapy, noted among 236 patients (48.6%). When including physiotherapy, 311 patients (64.0%) had at least one marker of non-compliance over 3 years; when excluding physiotherapy, 137 patients (28.2%) had at least one marker of non-compliance over 3 years. Among 153 patients who satisfied ASAS criteria for anti-TNF agents, the marker of non-compliance (i.e., failure to receive an anti-TNF when indicated) was noted among 88 (57.5%). Markers of non-compliance unrelated to physiotherapy or anti-TNF agents were infrequently observed.

Conclusion: In a cohort of early SpA patients, almost half had not had physiotherapy in the first 12 months, while over half of those satisfying the criteria for anti-TNFs did not receive one as soon as indicated. This study suggests areas for improvement in SpA care.

1Harvard S, Gossec L, Pham T, Richette P, Dougados M, Anis A,

Fautrel B. Measurable definitions of ankylosing spondylitis management recommendations are needed for use in observational studies. Joint Bone Spine. 2015 Mar 13.


Table 1. Quantitative Definitions of ASAS Recommendations as Markers of Non-Compliance

ASAS Recommendation Category

Marker(s) of Non-Compliance in Category

Marker Included in Analysis?

Marker Number (Label)

Non-Pharmacological Therapy

a. If by the 12-month follow-up visit, patient has had 0 visits to the physiotherapist

Yes

1 (Physiotherapy)

Extra-Articular Manifestations and Co-Morbidities

a. If at a given study visit, a patient has a new diagnosis of uveitis AND has not had an opthamologist consult by the next study visit

 

Yes

2 (Ophthalmologist)

b. If at a given study visit, a patient has a new diagnosis of psoriasis AND has not had a dermatologist consult by the next study visit

Yes

3 (Dermatologist)

c. If at a given study visit, a patient has a new diagnosis of pustulosis AND has not had a dermatologist consult by the next study visit

No (insufficient data)

4 (NA)

d. If at a given study visit, a patient has a new diagnosis of IBD AND has not had a gastroenterologist consult by the next study visit

Yes

5(Gastroenterologist)

e. If at a given study visit, a patient has a new cardiovascular event and has not had a cardiologist consult by the next study visit

No (too few cardiovascular events)

6 (Cardiologist)

Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

a. If patient received their first DMARD before their first NSAID 

Yes

7 (DMARD)

b. If patient has diagnosis of renal insufficiency (i.e., creatinine clearance < 30 ml/ min) and NSAID use is not interrupted within 15 days of that diagnosis (as assessed at next study visit) 

No (insufficient data)

8 (NA)

c. If patient has history of GI event other than dyspepsia and receives an NSAID or Cox inhibitor without a concomitant PPI

 

Yes

9 (PPI)

Glucocorticoids

a. If at a given study visit, a patient is receiving oral prednisone or equivalent and has no history of uveitis, peripheral arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease

Yes

10 (‘Prednisone’)

Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs

a. If patient has synovitis ³3 at two consecutive visits and is not prescribed a DMARD at either of these visits

No (too few synovitis ³3)

11 (NA)

b. If at a given study visit, a patient is receiving MTX and has no history of peripheral arthritis or psoriasis

Yes

12 (MTX)

c. If at a given study visit, a patient is receiving SSZ and has no history of peripheral arthritis, IBD, or uveitis

Yes

13 (SSZ)

Anti-TNF Agents

a. If at two consecutive study visits, patient has had at least 2 adequate therapeutic trials of NSAIDs (i.e., minimum two NSAIDs over a 4-week period in total since symptom onset), BASDAI is ³4, Physician’s Global Assessment of Disease is ³4 AND an anti-TNF agent has not been prescribed at the 3rd visit

Yes

14 (Anti-TNF)

b. If patient is receiving a biological agent other than anti-TNF (*EXCEPTION: psoriatic patients may receive a biologic other than anti-TNF, but then cannot receive a concomitant anti-TNF)

No (0 patients receiving other biologics)

15 (NA)


Table 2. DESIR Patients with Markers of Non-Compliance Over 3 Years of Follow-Up

Number of patients with non-compliance by time point

Marker

Baseline

6M

12M

18M

24M

36M

Ever

1: Physiotherapy

236 (48.6%)

236 (48.6%)

236 (48.6%)

236 (48.6%)

236 (48.6%)

2: Ophthalmologist

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (0.2%)

1 (0.2%)

3: Dermatologist

0 (0.0%)

7 (1.4%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

18 (3.7%)

18 (3.7%)

5: Gastroenterologist

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (0.2%)

1 (0.2%)

2 (0.4%)

3 (0.6%)

3 (0.6%)

7: DMARD

0 (0.0%)

23 (4.7%)

27 (5.6%)

27 (5.6%)

27 (5.6%)

27 (5.6%)

27 (5.6%)

9: PPI

6 (1.2%)

16 (3.3%)

17 (3.5%)

19 (3.9%)

19 (3.9%)

20 (4.1%)

20 (4.1%)

10: Prednisone

3 (0.6%)

11 (2.3%)

8 (1.6%)

5 (1.0%)

3 (0.6%)

8 (1.6%)

23 (4.7%)

12: MTX

1 (0.2%)

2 (0.4%)

2 (0.4%)

5 (1.0%)

5 (1.0%)

6 (1.2%)

6 (1.2%)

13: SSZ

2 (0.4%)

5 (1.0%)

4 (0.8%)

4 (0.8%)

4 (0.8%)

3 (0.6%)

7 (1.4%)

14: Anti-TNF

33 (6.8%)

42 (8.6%)

49 (10.1%)

53 (10.9%)

53 (10.9%)

Any Core Marker (1, 7, 10, 12, 13,14)

6 (1.2%)

40 (8.2%)

275 (56.6%)

281 (57.8%)

283 (58.2%)

288 (59.3%)

298 (61.3%)

Any Marker Excluding Physiotherapy

12 (2.5%)

57 (11.7%)

83 (17.1%)

92 (18.9%)

100 (20.6%)

124 (25.5%)

137 (28.2%)

Any Marker

12 (2.5%)

57 (11.7%)

281 (57.8%)

287 (59.1%)

290 (59.7%)

302 (62.1%)

311 (64.0%)


Disclosure: S. Harvard, None; D. Guh, None; N. Bansback, None; M. Dougados, None; A. H. Anis, None; B. Fautrel, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Harvard S, Guh D, Bansback N, Dougados M, Anis AH, Fautrel B. Markers of Non-Compliance with ASAS/EULAR Management Recommendations Among Early Spa Patients: Evidence over 3 Years in the DESIR Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/markers-of-non-compliance-with-asaseular-management-recommendations-among-early-spa-patients-evidence-over-3-years-in-the-desir-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/markers-of-non-compliance-with-asaseular-management-recommendations-among-early-spa-patients-evidence-over-3-years-in-the-desir-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology