ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1595

Magnitude and Duration of Early Response with Tofacitinib: Post-Hoc Analysis of Two Phase 3, Placebo-Controlled Studies

Daniel Aletaha1, Alan Kivitz2, Guillermo Valenzuela3, John Tesser4, Steven Hays5, Huihua Li5, Carol A Connell6, Eustratios Bananis5, Arif Soonasra5 and Josef Smolen7, 1Department of Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 3Integral Rheumatology & Immunology Specialists, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 4Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, Glendale, AZ, 5Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, 6Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 7Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna and Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Janus kinase (JAK) and tofacitinib

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. ORAL Solo1 and ORAL Sync2 are two Phase 3 index studies that demonstrated the efficacy of tofacitinib in adult patients (pts) with RA who were DMARD inadequate responders (DMARD-IR). Early onset of effect is a clinically meaningful endpoint. This post-hoc analysis examined the magnitude and durability of early response to tofacitinib in ORAL Solo and ORAL Sync.

Methods: ORAL Solo and ORAL Sync were double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, parallel-group studies in pts with active RA and an inadequate response to ≥1 conventional synthetic (cs) or biologic (b) DMARD.1,2 Pts were randomized to tofacitinib 5 mg BID, tofacitinib 10 mg BID, PBO advanced to tofacitinib 5 mg BID, or PBO advanced to tofacitinib 10 mg BID, either as monotherapy in ORAL Solo or with background csDMARD in ORAL Sync. In ORAL Solo, pts randomized to PBO were advanced to tofacitinib at Month 3; in ORAL Sync, pts randomized to PBO were advanced to tofacitinib at Month 3 (non-responders) or Month 6 (all other pts). In this post-hoc analysis, the following clinical efficacy data for pts on tofacitinib or PBO (prior to advancement to tofacitinib) ± csDMARD, were evaluated at Week 2, Month 3, and Month 6 (ORAL Sync only; no Month 6 PBO comparison in ORAL Solo): change from baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) >12,3 HAQ-DI change from baseline ≥0.22, CDAI ≥50% improvement from baseline, CDAI ≥70% improvement from baseline, CDAI ≥85% improvement from baseline, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) score improvement from baseline ≥4, Pain visual analog scale (VAS) score change from baseline ≥10. This analysis is post hoc and multiplicity adjustment was done.

Results: Clinical efficacy endpoint data are summarized in Table 1. At Week 2, more patients receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID ± csDMARDs (compared to PBO ± csDMARDs) achieved a CDAI change from baseline >12, HAQ-DI improvement from baseline ≥0.22, CDAI ≥50% improvement from baseline and pain VAS change from baseline ≥10. By Month 3, more pts receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID ± csDMARDs (compared to PBO ± csDMARDs) achieved the efficacy outcomes measured including improvements from baseline in FACIT-F scores ≥4, CDAI ≥50%, CDAI ≥70%, and CDAI ≥85% improvement from baseline. Responses attained at Month 3 were maintained or increased at Month 6.

Conclusion: DMARD-IR pts with active RA receiving tofacitinib ± csDMARDs appeared to show greater improvements compared to PBO in clinical disease activity, HAQ-DI, and pain as early as Week 2 (first post-baseline assessment), and improvements in fatigue by Month 3. Responses were maintained or improved through Month 3 (monotherapy) or Month 6 (with background DMARD). References: 1. Fleischmann R et al.  N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 495-507. 2. Kremer J et al.  Ann Intern Med 2013; 159: 253-261. 3. Curtis JR et al.  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken ) 2015; 67: 1345-1353.  


Disclosure: D. Aletaha, AbbVie, Pfizer, Grünenthal, Merck, Medac, UCB, Mitsubishi/Tanabe, Janssen, and Roche, 2,AbbVie, Pfizer, Grünenthal, Merck, Medac, UCB, Mitsubishi/Tanabe, Janssen, and Roche, 5; A. Kivitz, None; G. Valenzuela, None; J. Tesser, Pfizer Inc, 2,Pfizer Inc, 5,Pfizer Inc, 8; S. Hays, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; H. Li, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; C. A. Connell, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; E. Bananis, Pfizer Inc, 3,Pfizer Inc, 1; A. Soonasra, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; J. Smolen, Abbvie, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, 2,Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Celtrion, GSK, ILTOO, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Samsung, UCB, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Aletaha D, Kivitz A, Valenzuela G, Tesser J, Hays S, Li H, Connell CA, Bananis E, Soonasra A, Smolen J. Magnitude and Duration of Early Response with Tofacitinib: Post-Hoc Analysis of Two Phase 3, Placebo-Controlled Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/magnitude-and-duration-of-early-response-with-tofacitinib-post-hoc-analysis-of-two-phase-3-placebo-controlled-studies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/magnitude-and-duration-of-early-response-with-tofacitinib-post-hoc-analysis-of-two-phase-3-placebo-controlled-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology