ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1173

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients in Clinical Remission: Tenosynovitis and Osteitis Are Independent Predictors of Radiographic and MRI Damage Progression

Signe Møller-Bisgaard1, Kim Hørslev-Petersen 2, Bo Ejbjerg 3, Merete Lund Hetland 4, Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg 1, Daniel Glinatsi 1, Jakob Møller 5, Mikael Boesen 6, Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen 7, Ole Rintek Madsen 8, Bente Jensen 9, Jan Alexander Villadsen 10, Ellen-Margrethe Hauge 7, Philip Bennett 11, Oliver Hendricks 12, Karsten Asmussen 9, Marcin Kowalski 13, Hanne Lindegaard 14, Henning Bliddal 15, Niels Steen Krogh 16, Torkell Ellingsen 17, Agnete Nielsen 18, Lone Balding 5, Anne Grethe Jurik 19, Henrik Thomsen 5 and Mikkel Østergaard 20, 1Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2Department of Rheumatology, King Christian X’s Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases Graasten, Denmark, Graasten, Denmark, 3Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark, Køge, Denmark, 4DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, 7Department of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, Aarhus, Denmark, 8Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, 9Department of Rheumatology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, 10Department of Rheumatology, Silkeborg Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark, Silkeborg, Denmark, 11Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, 12Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Sønderborg, Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark, 13Department of Rheumatology, Hjørring Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark, Hjørring, Denmark, 14Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, Odense, Denmark, 15The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, 16Zitelab / DANBIO, Copenhagen, Denmark, 17Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark, 18Department of Radiology, Silkeborg Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark, Silkeborg, Denmark, 19Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, Aarhus, Denmark, 20Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and remission

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Imaging Of Rheumatic Diseases Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Progression of structural joint damage develops in 20-30 % of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical remission1. Known predictors of structural damage progression in both active RA and in remission are magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected synovitis and in particular osteitis/bone marrow edema (BME), but the predictive value of adding MRI tenosynovitis assessment as potential predictor in patients in clinical remission has not been investigated. The purpose was to investigate the predictive value of baseline MRI inflammatory and damage parameters on 2 year MRI and radiographic damage progression in an RA cohort in clinical remission, following MRI and conventional treat-to-target (T2T) strategies.

Methods: Two hundred RA patients in clinical remission, defined as DAS28-CRP< 3.2 and no swollen joints, on conventional DMARDs, were included in the IMAGINE-RA trial2. In this study patients were randomized to a conventional DAS28 + MRI-guided T2T strategy targeting absence of BME vs a conventional DAS28 guided T2T strategy. Patients had baseline and 2 years contrast-enhanced MRIs of the dominant wrist and 2nd-5th MCP joints and radiographs of hands and feet. Two experienced readers evaluated the MRIs and radiographs with known chronology according to the OMERACT RAMRIS scoring system and Sharp/van der Heijde method, respectively. The following potentially predictive baseline variables: MRI BME, synovitis, tenosynovitis, MRI and X-ray erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) score, CRP, DAS28, smoking status, gender, age and patient group were tested in univariate logistic regression analyses with 2-year progression in MRI combined damage score, Total Sharp Score (TSS), and MRI and X-ray JSN and erosion scores as dependent variables. Variables with p< 0.1, age, gender and patient group were included in multivariable logistic regression analyses with backward selection.

Results: Based on univariate analyses MRI BME, synovitis, tenosynovitis, x-ray erosion and JSN, gender and age were included in subsequent multivariable analyses. Independent MRI predictors of structural progression were BME (MRI progression) and tenosynovitis (MRI and radiographic progression), see table.

Conclusion: This trial is the first to report that MRI tenosynovitis independently predicts both radiographic and MRI damage progression in RA patients in clinical remission. Further studies are needed to confirm MRI-determined tenosynovitis as predictor of progressive joint destruction in RA clinical remission. 

References:

1) Lillegraven et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2012
2) Møller-Bisgaard et al. JAMA, 2019


ACR2019_abstract_IMAGINE_tenosynovitis_BME_predictor_of_damage_TABLE_20190603_FINAL_UPLOAD


Disclosure: S. Møller-Bisgaard, None; K. Hørslev-Petersen, AbbVie, 2, Pfizer, 9; B. Ejbjerg, None; M. Lund Hetland, Abbvie, 2, AbbVie, 2, Biogen, 2, BMS, 2, CellTrion, 2, 9, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, Orion, 2, Pfizer, 2, Samsung, 2, UCB, 2; L. Midtbøll Ørnbjerg, Novartis, 2; D. Glinatsi, None; J. Møller, None; M. Boesen, None; K. Stengaard-Pedersen, None; O. Rintek Madsen, None; B. Jensen, None; J. Villadsen, None; E. Hauge, None; P. Bennett, None; O. Hendricks, None; K. Asmussen, None; M. Kowalski, None; H. Lindegaard, None; H. Bliddal, None; N. Krogh, None; T. Ellingsen, None; A. Nielsen, None; L. Balding, None; A. Jurik, None; H. Thomsen, None; M. Østergaard, AbbVie, 2, 8, 9, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, UCB, 5, 8, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and UCB, 5, 8, Abbvie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, and Novartis, 2, Abbvie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, Novartis, 2, BMS, 2, 5, 8, 9, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 8, Boehringer-ingelheim, 9, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Centocor, 2, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, 9, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, 8, Eli-Lilly, 2, 8, Hospira, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, 9, Merck, 2, 5, 8, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Novo, 2, 5, 8, Novo Nordisk, 5, 8, Orion, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, 9, Regeneron, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, roche, 9, Sandoz, 2, 8, Sanofi, 2, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Møller-Bisgaard S, Hørslev-Petersen K, Ejbjerg B, Lund Hetland M, Midtbøll Ørnbjerg L, Glinatsi D, Møller J, Boesen M, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Rintek Madsen O, Jensen B, Villadsen J, Hauge E, Bennett P, Hendricks O, Asmussen K, Kowalski M, Lindegaard H, Bliddal H, Krogh N, Ellingsen T, Nielsen A, Balding L, Jurik A, Thomsen H, Østergaard M. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients in Clinical Remission: Tenosynovitis and Osteitis Are Independent Predictors of Radiographic and MRI Damage Progression [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/magnetic-resonance-imaging-in-patients-in-clinical-remission-tenosynovitis-and-osteitis-are-independent-predictors-of-radiographic-and-mri-damage-progression/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/magnetic-resonance-imaging-in-patients-in-clinical-remission-tenosynovitis-and-osteitis-are-independent-predictors-of-radiographic-and-mri-damage-progression/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology