ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 713

Lupuspro Is Responsive to Changes in Disease Activity over Time

David Giangreco1, Hervé Devilliers2, Narender Annapureddy1, Joel A. Block3 and Meenakshi Jolly1, 1Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 2Dijon University Hospital, Department of internal medicine and systemic diseases, Dijon, France, 3Section of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, outcome measures and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Treatment and Management Studies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Patient reported outcome (PRO) tools are important to understand, educate, manage, and follow patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Disease targeted PRO for SLE (LupusPRO) has good reliability and has been validated in several languages and cultural contexts. LupusPRO could be better integrated into routine clinical care and clinical trials in SLE if it was also found to be responsive to physician assessed changes in disease activity.  We sought to test the responsiveness of LupusPRO domains to changes in physician disease activity assessments in the routine clinical care setting.

Methods: Longitudinal data on LupusPRO and disease activity assessments were collected in the Rush Lupus Data Repository during routine clinical care visits. We tested only the responsiveness of the health related quality of life domains (HRQOL) as we expect these to change over short periods of time in response to disease activity. Disease activity assessments used as anchors for testing responsiveness included the SLEDAI physician global assessment (PGA), Total SELENA-SLEDAI, and the SELENA-Flare Index (SFI). Cut-offs used to determine change in disease activity were PGA (change of 0.3), SELENA-SLEDAI (change of 4), and SFI (remitting, stable and flaring). Non-parametric analysis of variance was used to compare changes in LupusPRO HRQOL domains against disease activity anchors.

Results: There were 658 visit data available for 185 patients. Consecutive visits were 2-5 months apart with a median number of visits per patient of 7. PGA was available for 651 visits; Total SLEDAI was available for 269 visits; SFI was available for 614 visits. Mean (SD) age and SELENA-SLEDAI were 43.5 (13.2) years and 6.4 (7.3), respectively. PGA changed significantly for 281 visit data (increased in 132, decreased in 142), while 377 visit data had unchanged PGA. LupusPRO HRQOL domains that changed significantly in the appropriate direction included Lupus Symptoms (p<0.001), Procreation (p=0.03), Pain-Vitality (p=0.002), Emotional Health (p=0.06), and Body Image (p=0.03). SELENA-SLEDAI changed significantly among 73 visits (32 increased, 41 decreased), and remained stable among 196 visits. LupusPRO HRQOL domains of Lupus symptoms (p=0.0004) and Pain-Vitality (p=0.02) responded significantly and in the appropriate direction. Significant changes in SFI were observed in 151 visit data (79 remitting, 72 flaring), while 463 visit data were unchanged. LupusPRO HRQOL domains that responded significantly in the appropriate direction in response to changes in SFI were Lupus symptoms (p <0.001), Procreation (p 0.005), Physical Health (p=0.0006) and Pain-Vitality (p<0.0001).  Mixed model analysis supported similar results.

Conclusion: Most HRQOL domains of LupusPRO are responsive to physician-assessed changes in disease activity in the routine patient care setting. LupusPRO is an appropriate tool to be used not only in clinical trials but also in the clinical care setting.


Disclosure:

D. Giangreco,
None;

H. Devilliers,
None;

N. Annapureddy,
None;

J. A. Block,
None;

M. Jolly,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lupuspro-is-responsive-to-changes-in-disease-activity-over-time/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology