ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2681

Lupus Primary Care Management Practices

Karin Tse and R. Paola Daly, Lupus Foundation of America, Washington, DC

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus and primary care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Due to the systemic nature of lupus, individuals may interact with a diverse health care team when experiencing lupus symptoms and before receiving a diagnosis. This study describes the management practices of various physicians who may care for patients presenting with lupus with a focus on primary care physicians (PCPs) to highlight areas of opportunity to reduce time to diagnosis and care.

Methods:

An online survey was administered to 910 physicians in September 2016 using a provider list from the Lupus Foundation of America and a commercial web panel of physicians. Data collection included physicians’ perceptions, attitudes and reported behaviors related to the path to diagnosis and treatment of people with lupus. Descriptive analyses were conducted using chi-square and Kruskal Wallis tests for post-hoc comparisons.

Results:

Respondent characteristics are described in Figure 1. Figure 2 summarizes referral and management practices among different provider types, notably with higher proportions of dermatologists and PCPs often diagnosing or treating lupus patients. Rheumatologists were excluded from analyses as they are the primary healthcare providers for people with lupus. All provider groups differed significantly from one another in management practice, with PCPs being more likely than pediatricians and OB/GYNs to manage lupus patients on their own before referring patients out. Providers classified as having minimal or no experience with lupus were also asked to identify earliest actions they would take during an appointment if a patient presented with lupus symptoms. 86.2% of PCPs with minimal experience (n=119) would order bloodwork as their first action, which was a higher percentage than all other provider types. Only 13.8% of these PCPs reported that referring to a specialist would be their first action, ranking last after ordering bloodwork, asking a patient to track symptoms and following up, or directly treating the symptoms.

Conclusion:

PCPs frequently care for patients presenting with lupus who may or may not yet be diagnosed. These analyses highlight the tendency of PCPs to delay referrals when caring for these patients. Further studies should be conducted to examine whether this management preference exists among larger groups of PCPs and explore potential barriers for referring to specialists.

Disclosure:

The Lupus Foundation of America received funding from UCB Pharma to support study data collection.

Respondent characteristics (n=910)

Characteristic

n (%)

Provider type

PCP

350 (38.5)

Pediatrician

130 (14.3)

OB/GYN

130 (14.3)

Rheumatologist

170 (18.7)

Dermatologist

130 (14.3)

Practice setting

Independent/private

511 (56.2)

Public health clinic (non-academic)

61 (6.7)

Part of a network of physicians at a hospital, health system, or university

298 (32.7)

Other

40 (4.4)

Medicaid/Medicare

Accept Medicare

221 (24.3)

acceptance

Accept Medicaid

92 (10.1)

Accept both Medicare and Medicaid

525 (57.7)

Do not accept Medicare or Medicaid patients

57 (6.3)

Not sure

15 (1.6)

Geographic

(Sub)urban

821 (90.2)

location

Rural

89 (9.8)

Figure 1. Respondent Characteristics

\s

Figure 2. Management practices of patients presenting with lupus among physician groups (n=910)


Disclosure: K. Tse, Lupus Foundation of America, 3; R. P. Daly, Lupus Foundation of America, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tse K, Daly RP. Lupus Primary Care Management Practices [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lupus-primary-care-management-practices/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lupus-primary-care-management-practices/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology