ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1770

Lupus Low Disease Activity State Protects Against Pre-Term Birth

Michelle Petri1, Jessica Li2 and Daniel Goldman3, 1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, 2Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 3Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Timonium, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Disease Activity, pregnancy, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) (Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:1615–21.) combine both low disease activity (SLEDAI score of ≤4, PGA >=1 no flare, no severe organ involvement) and prednisone reduction ( >= 7.5 mg). Being in LLDAS for 50% or more of follow-up visits results in a 50% reduction in organ damage (Arthritis Rheumatol 2018;70:1790-5). LLDAS has been a useful secondary outcome measure in randomized clinical trials. We asked whether being in LLDAS at the start of pregnancy predicted the pregnancy outcome.

Methods: All patients met revised ACR or SLICC classification criteria. At each visit, LLDAS was calculated. The start date of each pregnancy was determined. At each visit, we created a variable to indicate the trimester of the pregnancy. To evaluate whether LLDAS at the first pregnancy visit associated with pregnancy outcomes, a GEE model was used to account for the same patient contributing more than one pregnancy.

Results: There were 636 pregnancies (from 435 patients: 36% African American, 54.5% Caucasian) that had LLDAS status determined at the first pregnant visit. Of these 636 pregnancies, there were 537 births, 77 miscarriages, and 22 terminations. 291 patients had 1 pregnancy, 100 had 2, and 44 had 3 recorded. There was no association between reaching LLDAS at the first pregnancy visit and miscarriage (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.44, 1.15, p=0.16, adjusted for age and race). Table 1 shows the association between LLDAS at the first pregnancy visit and preterm birth, with 537 pregnancies eligible for analysis. There was strong evidence of an association between LLDAS at first pregnant visit and preterm birth. Next, we looked at pregnancies that had the first visit in the first trimester. There were 462 pregnancies included. Once again, there was no association with miscarriage (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.45, 1.29 p=0.312 adjusted for age and race). Table 2 shows the analysis of being in LLDAS at the first trimester and preterm birth (396 pregnancies were eligible for analysis). The same strong protective effect of being in LLDAS against preterm birth was found.

Conclusion: Currently, women with SLE are told that their SLE should be “in remission” for 6 months prior to conception.  Our data suggest that being in LLDAS may be sufficient to protect against preterm birth, which numerically remains the most frequent adverse pregnancy outcome in SLE.  LLDAS does not protect against miscarriage (likely because antiphospholipid antibodies contribute to miscarriage risk). LLDAS is a more realistic pre-pregnancy clinical goal, as durable remission is difficult to achieve in SLE.

Table 1: Association between LLDAS at first pregnancy visit and preterm birth

Table 2: Association between LLDAS at first trimester visit and preterm birth


Disclosure: M. Petri, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, BMS, 5, Decision Resources, 5, GSK, 2, 5, INOVA, 5, IQVIA, 5, Janssen, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Merck EMD Serono, 5, Sanofi Japan, 5, Thermofisher, 5, UCB, 5, Exagen, 2; J. Li, None; D. Goldman, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Petri M, Li J, Goldman D. Lupus Low Disease Activity State Protects Against Pre-Term Birth [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lupus-low-disease-activity-state-protects-against-pre-term-birth/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lupus-low-disease-activity-state-protects-against-pre-term-birth/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology