ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 705

Lupus Chest Pain in the Emergency Department:  a Common Diagnostic Dilemma

Masoom Modi1, Mariko L. Ishimori1, Daniel J. Wallace2 and Michael Weisman1, 1Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 2Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai/David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: SLE and cardiovascular disease

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Treatment and Management Studies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  

Chest pain (CP) is a common symptom reported by SLE patients often leading to presentation to Emergency Departments (ED). The origin of CP can be attributed to many causes, which may or may not be cardiac in nature. It is important to understand the prevalence of CP in SLE, with ED visits being a window of opportunity for early detection of SLE heart disease.

Methods:  

Billing records of patients who presented to Cedars-Sinai Medical Center ED with ICD-9 codes for SLE between 3/2009–10/2013 were reviewed; this data was then examined for secondary ICD-9 codes for CP (786.50-786.59). Two study groups were formed, based on discharge from ED vs. hospital admission. Visits were evaluated for basic cardiac work up with EKG and cardiac enzymes, and number of visits by individual patient recorded. Hospital admissions were evaluated for CP etiology and discharge diagnoses. Continuous variables were analyzed by paired t test, and categorical data by chi squared test.

Results:  

Of 2675 ED visits with ICD-9 codes for SLE; 397 had secondary codes for CP (15%).  Of the 397 SLE and CP visits, 173 visits were discharged directly from the ED and 224 visits became hospital admissions.

The ED discharged group was significantly younger (p<0.0005) compared with the hospital admitted group. 

ED discharge group:  The 173 ED visits were accounted for by 127 unique patients. 77% of these visits received a basic cardiac work up.  While most patients had just 1 visit, a small number (7%) were frequent users of the ED, with an estimated one fourth of all visits.  

Hospital Admitted Group:  The 224 admissions were accounted for by 161 unique patients. 92% of admitted patients received a basic cardiac work up.

CP in the hospitalized group: The most commonly listed discharge diagnoses based upon primary physician’s work up and opinion, and the listed diagnoses for CP in the discharge summary are shown in Table 1. Rule out of Acute Coronary Syndrome (28.6%) was the most common diagnosis. Over 50% of CP at discharge was attributed to non-cardiac causes. 

Conclusion:  

Of all SLE coded patients presenting to the CSMC ED over a 4.5 year period, 15% had complaints of CP, which is higher than the national average for CP in non-SLE patients (10%). Frequent ED users (3 or more visits) made up only 7% of the total sample, but accounted for 24% of all the ED visits. Over90% of admitted patients had a basic cardiac work up performed. However, only a small percentage had a discharge diagnosis that was related to cardiovascular disease (7.2%). There is a high percentage of a negative cardiac work up with a majority of non-cardiac diagnoses in SLE patients, strengthening the need for more research into improved biomarkers or more specific imaging techniques to assess the etiology of CP. This study was a first step in revealing the high prevalence of CP in SLE patients presenting to the ED, while examining the limited diagnostic capabilities of a traditional cardiac work up.

Table 1: Chest Pain in the Hospitalized Group
Discharge Diagnosis Percentage of Admissions
Cardiovascular Disease (CAD, MI, Unstable Angina, Microvascular Disease) 7.2%
Pericarditis (SLE related) 3.1%
Other Cardiac NOS (CHF, Arrhytmia, PVD) 4%
Rule out of Acute Coronary Syndrome 28.6%
Musculoskeletal/ Costochondritis 24.6%
Pulmonary (Pulmonary Embolism, Pneumonia, COPD) 13.8%
Gastro-Intestinal 8.9%
Multi-Factorial 9.8%

Disclosure:

M. Modi,
None;

M. L. Ishimori,
None;

D. J. Wallace,
None;

M. Weisman,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lupus-chest-pain-in-the-emergency-department-a-common-diagnostic-dilemma/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology