ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2046

Lower-Dose Indomethacin Submicron Particle Capsules’ Efficacy In Acute Pain: Results From Two Phase 3 Studies

Roy D. Altman1, Allan Gibofsky2, Mark Jaros3 and Clarence Young4, 1David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 2Medicine and Public Health, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Summit Analytical, Denver, CO, 4Iroko Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), pain, pain management and treatment options

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases II: Miscellaneous Rheumatic Diseases

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Indomethacin is used to treat acute gouty arthritis and other acute pain conditions but, like other NSAIDs, is associated with dose-related gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and renal complications. A US Food and Drug Administration Public Health Advisory recommended that physicians use NSAIDs at “the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration consistent with individual patient treatment goals.” A challenge with using existing NSAIDs at lower doses is achieving efficacy. New, submicron particle NSAIDs with enhanced absorption are under investigation to evaluate efficacy at lower doses than commercially available NSAIDs. We report the results of two phase 3 studies that evaluated investigational, lower-dose indomethacin submicron particle capsules compared with placebo in patients with acute pain following elective surgery.

Methods: Two phase 3, multi-center, randomized, double-blind studies enrolled patients 18 to 65 years of age undergoing bunionectomy with osteotomy and internal fixation under regional anesthesia. Patients with a pain intensity rating of ≥40 mm/100-mm by  Visual Analog Scale following surgery received indomethacin submicron particle capsules (40 mg three times daily [TID] or twice daily [BID], or 20 mg TID), or placebo. One study included celecoxib (400 mg loading dose followed by 200 mg BID). The primary endpoint was the overall (summed) pain intensity difference measured by Visual Analog Scale over 48 h.

Results: Overall, 835 patients were enrolled in both studies with >350 patients in each study. In study 1, all doses of indomethacin submicron particle capsules provided significantly better analgesia than placebo (P ≤ 0.046). While celecoxib led to some pain control, it did not achieve statistical significance compared with placebo (P = 0.103; Table). In study 2, indomethacin submicron particle capsules 40 mg TID (P = 0.034) and BID (P = 0.023) provided significantly better analgesia than placebo (Table). In both studies, adverse events were generally similar across treatment groups and included nausea, localized post-procedural edema, dizziness, and headache.

Conclusion: Investigational, lower-dose indomethacin submicron particle capsules provided effective analgesia in two phase 3 studies in patients with acute pain following elective surgery. Indomethacin submicron particle capsules are a potentially promising lower-dose option for patients with acute pain.


Disclosure:

R. D. Altman,

Ferring Pharmaceuticals,

9,

McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals,

5,

DePuy Synthes,

5,

Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc,

5,

Oletec,

5;

A. Gibofsky,

GlaxoSmithKline plc,

1,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

1,

Johnson & Johnson,

1,

Horizon Phartmaceuticals,

5,

Iroko Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Abbott Laboratories,

9,

Amgen, Inc,

9,

Genentech, Inc,

9;

M. Jaros,

Summit Analytical,

3;

C. Young,

Iroko Pharmaceuticals LLC,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lower-dose-indomethacin-submicron-particle-capsules-efficacy-in-acute-pain-results-from-two-phase-3-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology