ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2047

Lower-Dose Indomethacin Submicron Particle Capsules’ Combined Safety From Two Phase 3 Studies In Patients With Acute Pain Following Elective Surgery

Allan Gibofsky1, Roy D. Altman2, Clarence Young3, Daniel Solorio4 and Jennifer Nezzer5, 1Medicine and Public Health, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 3Iroko Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, 4Iroko Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Philadelphia, PA, 5Premier Research, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), pain, pain management and treatment options

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases II: Miscellaneous Rheumatic Diseases

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Indomethacin is prescribed to treat acute pain and inflammation but, like other NSAIDs, is associated with dose-dependent gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and renal adverse events (AEs). A US Food and Drug Administration Public Health Advisory recommended that physicians use NSAIDs at “the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration consistent with individual patient treatment goals.” The efficacy of new, submicron particle NSAIDs with enhanced absorption is being evaluated at lower doses than commercially available NSAIDs. We present safety and tolerability data from two phase 3 studies evaluating the analgesic efficacy and safety of investigational, lower-dose indomethacin submicron particle capsules in patients with acute pain following elective surgery.

Methods: Two phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind studies enrolled patients 18 to 65 years of age undergoing bunionectomy with osteotomy and internal fixation under regional anesthesia. Patients with a pain intensity rating of ≥40 mm/100-mm Visual Analog Scale following surgery received indomethacin submicron particle capsules (40 mg three times daily [TID] or twice daily [BID], or 20 mg TID), or placebo. One study included celecoxib (400 mg loading dose followed by 200 mg BID). Safety assessments included an overall summary of AEs by severity and seriousness.

Results: The pooled safety population included 835 patients. AEs were similar across treatment groups (Table). The most common AEs were nausea, post-procedural edema, headache, dizziness, vomiting, post-procedural hemorrhage, and constipation. There were no severe cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, or renal AEs. One serious AE, deep vein thrombosis, occurred in the indomethacin submicron particle capsules 40 mg BID treatment group and was determined by the investigator to be unrelated to the study drug. Seven patients withdrew from the trials due to an AE. AEs leading to withdrawal included one case each of uvulitis, angioedema, pyrexia, anxiety, and nausea, and 2 cases of urticaria.

Conclusion: Indomethacin submicron particle capsules were generally well-tolerated in two phase 3 studies in patients with acute pain following elective surgery. Based on emerging efficacy data, investigational, lower-dose indomethacin submicron particle capsules represent a potentially promising lower-dose option for treating acute pain.


Disclosure:

A. Gibofsky,

GlaxoSmithKline plc,

1,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

1,

Johnson & Johnson,

1,

Horizon Phartmaceuticals,

5,

Iroko Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Abbott Laboratories,

9,

Amgen, Inc,

9,

Genentech, Inc,

9;

R. D. Altman,

Ferring Pharmaceuticals,

9,

McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals,

5,

DePuy Synthes,

5,

Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc,

5,

Oletec,

5;

C. Young,

Iroko Pharmaceuticals LLC,

3;

D. Solorio,

Iroko Pharmaceuticals, LLC,

3;

J. Nezzer,

Premier Research,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lower-dose-indomethacin-submicron-particle-capsules-combined-safety-from-two-phase-3-studies-in-patients-with-acute-pain-following-elective-surgery/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology