ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1152

Low Rates of Bone Mineral Density Testing by Rheumatologists in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Glucocorticoid Therapy

JB Boone1, S. Bobo Tanner 1 and April Barnado 1, 1Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Bone density, Electronic Health Record and health disparities, glucocorticoids, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Healthcare Disparities In Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at an increased risk of developing osteoporosis and clinical fractures compared to healthy controls. Bone loss in SLE is multifactorial from the negative effects of systemic inflammation and use of glucocorticoids (GCs). The American College of Rheumatology recommends bone mineral density (BMD) testing within 6 months of starting chronic GC therapy for autoimmune conditions, including SLE.  Prior studies have not investigated the frequency of BMD testing in the setting of chronic GC therapy and SLE using an electronic health record (EHR) cohort. Using a real-world, EHR cohort, we assessed the frequency of BMD testing in patients with SLE and GC therapy. We evaluated patient and provider factors impacting BMD testing.

Methods: We identified SLE cases from a de-identified EHR with over 2.9 million subjects with decades of follow-up using a previously validated and published algorithm. We chart reviewed to collect demographic, medication, and BMD data. We assessed for ever use of oral or intravenous GCs from inpatient and outpatient electronic prescribing systems, provider notes, and phone messages. Long term GC use was defined as ≥ 90 days of continuous use. Patients prescribed GCs for non-rheumatologic issues were excluded from review. The provider ordering BMD testing was recorded. Lowest T-scores were recorded from the femoral neck and lumbar spine. When multiple BMD tests were performed, the lowest T-score was recorded. Our primary outcome was frequency of BMD testing in SLE patients with long term GC therapy. We also evaluated for differences in SLE cases who had BMD testing vs. not using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.

Results: We conducted chart review on 729 SLE cases. Of these cases, 539 had available medication duration data with 475 (88%) with long term GC use. SLE cases with long term GC use had a current mean age of 54 ± 17 years and were predominantly female (89%) with 72% Caucasian, 22% African American, 4% Hispanic and 2% Asian. The median age at first BMD testing was 51 years. BMD testing was ordered in 40% of cases with long term GC use. Rheumatologists accounted for ordering 75% of the BMD tests. The median time from start of GCs to first BMD testing was 2.5 years. The mean T-score of cases with long term GC use was -1.4 ± 0.9.  There were no differences in sex between cases with or without BMD testing (Table 1). SLE cases with long term GC use and BMD testing were older compared to cases with long term GC use without BMD testing (60 ± 16 v. 50 ± 16, p < 0.001). Caucasians and Hispanics were more likely to have BMD testing than African Americans and Asians (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Using a large EHR cohort, only 40% of SLE cases with long term GC use had BMD testing. SLE patients that were younger, African American, or Asian were all less likely to have BMD testing performed. These groups with the lowest rates of BMD testing are the same groups that are at highest risk of requiring a significant amount of GCs during their disease course and developing GC-related bone loss. Screening strategies for BMD testing should be implemented that target these high-risk groups.


GIOP Table 1


Disclosure: J. Boone, None; S. Tanner, Amgen, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, UCB, 5, Regeneron, 8, Sanofi, 8, AstraZeneca, 8, Pfizer, 8; A. Barnado, NIH/NIAMS 5K08AR072757-02, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Boone J, Tanner S, Barnado A. Low Rates of Bone Mineral Density Testing by Rheumatologists in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Glucocorticoid Therapy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/low-rates-of-bone-mineral-density-testing-by-rheumatologists-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-glucocorticoid-therapy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/low-rates-of-bone-mineral-density-testing-by-rheumatologists-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-glucocorticoid-therapy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology