ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1191

Low-Dose Anakinra Is Effective For The Prophylaxis Of Acute Episodes Of Inflammation In Severe Tophaceous Gout

Fernando Perez-Ruiz1,2, Ana M. Herrero-Beites3, Monike de Miguel4 and Joana Atxotegi5,6, 1BioCruces Health Research Institute, Baracaldo, Spain, 2Servicio de Reumatologia, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Baracaldo, Spain, 3Physical Medicine Division, Hospital de Gorliz, Gorliz, Spain, 4Pharmacy Division, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Baracaldo, Spain, 5Rheumatology Division, Hospital de Cruces, Baracaldo, Spain, 6BioCruces Health Institute, Baracaldo, Spain

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Anakinra, gout and prevention

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: anakinra has been used off-label for the treatment of severe episodes of acute inflammation (EAIs) in gout. Only a retrospective series of 3 patients has reported the use of ankinra as prophylaxis when used in an intermittent schedule. Therefore studies are needed to explore whether a low-dose prescription of anakinra would be effective in patients with severe difficult to treat gout and a formal contraindication of other current treatments for the prophylaxis of AEIs when starting urate-lowering therapy (ULT).

Methods: an agreement between the Rheumatology and Pharmacy Divisions was approved to treat with anakinra patients with severe or recurrent EAIs and a formal contraindication for current treatments for prophylaxis (colchicine and NSAIDs) and requiring repeated doses of parenteral corticosteroids not acceptable from the clinical point of view. As a pilot study, patients with crystal-proved gout were included in a cohort for follow-up from Jul 2011 to Jan 2013. All patients were scheduled for a 6-month period of treatment: anakinra 100 mg sc once a week with additional 100 mg doses on demand during the first 3 months and only on demand 100 mg sc doses from month 3 to 6. In addition to full clinical evaluation, serum urate, hsC-reactive protein, estimated glomerular filtration (CKD_EPI), complete blood cell counts, and liver function tests were tested once a month for the first three months, and at 6-month follow-up. AEIs were evaluated using the EULAR/ACR preliminary criteria for self-referred AEIs in gout and expressed as EAIS/patient-year exposure.

Results: 11 patients with chronic tophaceous (either subcutaneous or ultrasonographic/MRI), polyarticular (> 3 joints involved), crystal-proven gout were been included in the protocol. Ten were 10 men, mean age was 60±14 years (median 61, IQ range 48-69), time from the onset of gout 8±5 years (8, 5-15), subcutaneous tophi in 9/11, chronic heart failure 4/11, CKD 3-5 in 8/11, serious AEs to NSAIDs in 9/11. Diabetes or steroid-induced hyperglycemia in 8/11. Febuxostat 80 to 120 mg/day was prescribed to 6 patients, allopurinol 50 up to 300 mg/day to 6 patients (average dose 5.2 mg/ml FG-day). One patient was on hemodialysis and one showed normal serum urate and no need for urate-lowering agents.

Results are shown in Table. In the 0-3 period, 4/11 required additional doses, and 6/11 while on demand dosing from month 3-6. A patient had an episode of heart failure (4th in the year) but was maintained on treatment, doing well 16 months after treatment. No intercurrent infection was observed in any patient. No local reaction complaint was retrieved with a weekly schedule.

*P< 0.01 vs baseline

Baseline  (median, IQ range)

1st mo

(100 mg qw+100 mg on demand)

2nd mo

(100 mg qw+100 mg on demand)

3rd mo

(100 mg qw+100 mg on demand)

6th mo

(100 mg on demand)

SuA (mg/dl)

10.2±2.1 (9.5, 9.1-10.3)

5.6±1.4 (5.6, 5.0-6.9)*

4.6±0.7 (4.6, 4.2-5.2)*

4.6±1.3* (4.8, 3.6-4.9)

5.0±1.1*  (5.4, 4.8-5.7)

hsCRP (mg/dl)

2.05±2.98 (2.4, 1.7-21.9)

1.4±1.3 (0.8, 0.3-2.7)*

1.22±1.52 (0.2, 0.2-2.3)*

0.39±0.88* (0.1, 0.1-0.2)

0.56±1.07 (0.1, 0.10-0.45)

CCR (ml/min)

67±30 (62, 43-89)

65±32 (63, 38-86)

69±41 (67, 42-88)

78±35 (78, 43-111)

74±32 (65, 46-111)

EIA (per patient/year)

13±9 (10, 6-24)

–

–

2.6±5.3  (0, 0-4)*

2.0±2.1  (2, 0-4)*

Conclusion: this pilot study is, to our knowledge, the first to prospectively explore in pre-established doses the efficacy of low-dose anakinra for the prophylaxis of AEIs in patients with severe comorbidities and difficult to treat tophaceous gout.  These encouraging results deserve further studies.


Disclosure:

F. Perez-Ruiz,

Menarini International,

5,

SOBI,

5,

AstraZeneca,

5,

Menarini,

8;

A. M. Herrero-Beites,
None;

M. de Miguel,
None;

J. Atxotegi,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/low-dose-anakinra-is-effective-for-the-prophylaxis-of-acute-episodes-of-inflammation-in-severe-tophaceous-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology