ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 166

Low-Dose Allopurinol Promotes Greater Serum Urate Lowering in Gout Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Vs Normal Renal Function

Michael DeBerardine1, Mark C. Fisher2, Robert T. Keenan3, Michael H. Pillinger4 and Daria B. Crittenden4, 1NYU School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York, NY, 2Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Rheumatology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 4Internal Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York, NY

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Gout and renal disease

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be at increased risk for allopurinol (ALLO) hypersensitivity, possibly because impaired renal excretion causes accumulation of the active ALLO metabolite oxypurinol (OXY). For this reason, lower doses of ALLO are recommended when initiating urate lowering in CKD patients. OXY accumulation suggests that ALLO should also be more efficacious in CKD patients, a hypothesis not previously tested. We therefore assessed whether ALLO is more effective at lowering serum urate (sUA) in patients with CKD vs those with normal renal function.

Methods: Using the electronic medical record of the NY Harbor VA Health Care System, we identified all gout patients taking 100 mg or 300 mg of ALLO daily between August 2007 and August 2008 for whom both pre- and post-treatment sUAs were available. ALLO use was identified using pharmacy records and confirmed by individual chart review. Baseline characteristics were obtained. Patients in each ALLO dose group were categorized by National Kidney Foundation stages, and mean change in sUA for each ALLO dose according to CKD stage was determined.

Figure 2.jpgResults: Among 1288 charts reviewed, 199 patients met entry criteria and had sufficient data to permit evaluation. 95 patients were taking 100 mg and 104 were taking 300 mg ALLO daily. 100 mg vs 300 mg groups were similar in age (71.4±1.2 vs 68.7±1.1 years) and BMI (29.1±0.6 vs 30.9±0.6). Overall, patients taking 300 mg experienced a trend toward greater sUA decrease vs those taking 100 mg (2.9±0.2 vs 2.5±0.2 mg/dL, p=0.13), resulting in a lower post-treatment mean sUA in the 300 mg group (7.0±0.2 mg/dL for 100 mg dose, 6.1±0.2 mg/dL for 300 mg dose, p=0.001). Across increasing degrees of renal insufficiency, mean decreases of sUA in patients taking 300 mg did not change significantly. In contrast, in patients taking 100 mg, decreases in sUA (in mg/dL) increased progressively from stage I to V CKD: stage I (n=10) sUA decrease = 1.7±0.6, stage II (n=25) = 2.4±0.4, stage III (n=46) = 2.7±0.4, stage IV (n=8) = 2.5±0.9, stage V (n=6) = 3.1±0.6. Whereas patients with normal renal function (stage I) experienced greater sUA lowering with 300 mg vs 100 mg (3.4±0.7 vs 1.7±0.6 mg/dL, p=0.04), 100 mg ALLO was as efficacious as the 300 mg dose in patients with stage V CKD (sUA decrease 3.1±0.6 vs 3.1±0.2 mg/dL, p=0.5).

Conclusion: In patients with gout, low-dose ALLO is progressively more effective for sUA lowering in proportion to increasing degrees of renal insufficiency, presumably owing to OXY accumulation. No such effect was seen at the 300 mg dose, suggesting that sUA-lowering effects may reach a ceiling in CKD patients. These data support the strategy of starting gout patients with CKD on low-dose ALLO and titrating upwards only as needed, not only to minimize toxicity, but also because lower doses may be more effective in CKD patients, and higher doses may confer little or no additional benefit.


Disclosure:

M. DeBerardine,
None;

M. C. Fisher,
None;

R. T. Keenan,
None;

M. H. Pillinger,
None;

D. B. Crittenden,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/low-dose-allopurinol-promotes-greater-serum-urate-lowering-in-gout-patients-with-chronic-kidney-disease-vs-normal-renal-function/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology