ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 574

Longitudinal Efficacy Analysis of Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic Dmards: Response Following Rescue from Baricitinib 2mg to 4mg Once-Daily

Roy Fleischmann1, Mark C. Genovese2, Anabela Cardoso3, Luna Sun3, Yun-Fei Chen3, Chad D. Walls3, Douglas E. Schlichting3, Tsutomu Takeuchi4, Maxime Dougados5, Josef S. Smolen6 and Jeffrey R. Curtis7, 1Metroplex Clinical Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 2Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 4Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 5Paris Descartes University, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France, 6Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 7University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Janus kinase (JAK) and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatments Poster I: Strategy and Epidemiology

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Baricitinib (bari), an oral selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, has shown clinical efficacy in patients (pts) with RA and an inadequate response to conventional synthetic DMARDs.1 Baricitinib is approved for treating moderate-severe RA in over 40 countries. The two objectives of these analyses were to evaluate the percentage of pts, originally randomized to 2 mg or 4 mg in the Phase 3 RA-BUILD study, and rescued in the study and/or in RA-BEYOND (the long-term extension study); and to assess the clinical benefits post-rescue.

Methods: RA-BUILD was a 24-week study evaluating once daily bari 4 mg (N=227) and 2 mg (N=229) compared to placebo (N=228). Pts with <20% improvement in tender joint count or swollen joint count (SJC) at Weeks 14 and 16 compared to baseline were rescued to bari 4 mg at Week 16; at Week 20, rescue was based on investigators’ decision. Pts not rescued continued blinded treatment in RA-BEYOND and those with Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)>10 at or after 3 months in RE-BEYOND were eligible for rescue to bari 4 mg, but not required. Once rescued, change in background medications was allowed. In RA-BEYOND, unrescued pts achieving sustained CDAI ≤10 were randomized to bari 2 mg or maintained at 4 mg. Descriptive longitudinal data analysis was based on observed data from pts randomized to bari 2- or 4-mg in RA-BUILD, including data up to 1 April 2017 in RA-BEYOND. Percent rescued and overall response rates in achieving CDAI ≤10, and pain (visual analogue scale ≤10, 20 or 40 mm), were evaluated from time of original randomization to bari 4 mg and 2 mg in RA-BUILD. Median change over time in CDAI, HAQ, SJC28 and pain after rescue from 2 to 4 mg was evaluated using pt data at time of rescue (reset as Week 0).  

Results: The percentage of pts on bari 4 mg “rescued” in RA-BUILD was 36% compared to 52% in pts originally assigned to bari 2 mg. In RA-BEYOND, 7% of pts originally randomized to 4 mg were rescued after dose tapering to 2 mg. Clinically meaningful response rates in CDAI (≤10) and pain improvement increased and stabilized over time in the bari-treated population. Pts rescued in RA-BEYOND, after being treated with bari in RA-BUILD had less disease activity compared to pts rescued in RA-BUILD at the time of rescue (Table). Pts on 2 mg rescued to bari 4 mg in RA-BEYOND demonstrated improved disease control with the majority achieving CDAI≤10 and pain reduction (Figure).

 

 

Conclusion: Fewer pts originally assigned to bari 4 mg in RA-BUILD required rescue compared to pts assigned to 2 mg. Disease activity assessed by CDAI and patient-reported pain improved in many pts after rescue from 2 to 4 mg of bari.

References: 1.Dougados, M et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:88

 

 

 



Disclosure: R. Fleischmann, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aventis, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech, GSK, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, 2,AbbVie, Akros, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, 5; M. C. Genovese, AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos, Gilead, Pfizer, 5; A. Cardoso, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; L. Sun, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; Y. F. Chen, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; C. D. Walls, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; D. E. Schlichting, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; T. Takeuchi, Astra Zeneca K.K., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Novartis Pharma K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Abbivie GK, Nipponkayaku Co.Ltd, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc,. Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., Taisho Toyama, 5,AbbVie GK., Bristol–Myers K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co,. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan Inc., Astellas Pharma Inc, Diaichi Sankyo Co.,Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Sanofi K.K., Teijin Pharma Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Novartis Pha, 8; M. Dougados, Abbvie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, UCB, Merck, Roche, BMS , UCB, 2, 5; J. S. Smolen, AbbVie, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, 2,AbbVie, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Astro, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, Glaxo, ILTOO, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Medimmune, MSD, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, 5; J. R. Curtis, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Corrona, UCB, Myriad, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fleischmann R, Genovese MC, Cardoso A, Sun L, Chen YF, Walls CD, Schlichting DE, Takeuchi T, Dougados M, Smolen JS, Curtis JR. Longitudinal Efficacy Analysis of Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic Dmards: Response Following Rescue from Baricitinib 2mg to 4mg Once-Daily [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/longitudinal-efficacy-analysis-of-patients-with-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-inadequate-response-to-conventional-synthetic-dmards-response-following-rescue-from-baricitinib-2mg-to-4mg-once-daily/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/longitudinal-efficacy-analysis-of-patients-with-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-inadequate-response-to-conventional-synthetic-dmards-response-following-rescue-from-baricitinib-2mg-to-4mg-once-daily/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology