Session Information
Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)
Long Term Safety of Intravenous Golimumab and Comparison with Subcutaneous Golimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results through 2 Years
Background/Purpose: To describe the safety profile of IV GLM in RA (MTX nonresponders) from the Ph3 GO-FURTHER trial. AE rates of interest are indirectly compared to those observed in the SC GLM GO-FORWARD trial in a similar pt population.
Methods: In GO-FURTHER, pts with active RA despite MTX were randomized to MTX + IV PBO or GLM 2mg/kg at wks 0, 4, and q8wks. In GO-FORWARD, pts with active RA despite MTX were randomized to SC PBO+MTX or SC GLM 100mg+PBO, GLM 50 mg+MTX, or GLM 100 mg+MTX administered q4wks. Observed safety findings through wk 112 for GO-FURTHER and wk 104 in GO-FORWARD are reported; incidence rates/100 pt-yrs are reported for AEs of interest from data through the August 15, 2012 cut-off (120-day safety update) in GO-FURTHER and from the wk160 CSR in GO-FORWARD. Comparison of targeted safety events between IV and SC GLM are reported. Pts who received ≥1administration were included.
Results: Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were similar in GO-FURTHER and GO-FORWARD. 584 pts received IV GLM, with a mean follow-up of 95.9 wks. 434 pts received SC GLM, with a mean follow-up of 89.9 wks. Overall AEs observed in GO-FURTHER and GO-FORWARD are summarized (Table). Similar proportions of pts in GO-FURTHER (wk 112) and GO-FORWARD (wk 104) had an AE (79.1% and 89.4%, respectively), an SAE (18.2% and 22.6%, respectively), or discontinued due to an AE (7.0% and 9.4%, respectively). Infections/infestations were the most common type of AE in both trials. Rates of selected SAEs per 100 pt-years through the August 15, 2012 cut-off in GO-FURTHER and wk 160 in GO-FORWARD showed no difference in AE rates or significant SAEs between GLM IV and SC in RA pts previously treated with MTX with the exception of patients with ALT abnormalities (>1 – < 3 x ULN). Similar differences were noted through all ALT tertiles (≥3 – <5 x ULN; ≥5 x ULN). (Table). Incidence of nonserious infusion reactions (median 30 minute infusions) remained low regardless of infusion length, and no serious infusion reactions, requiring study discontinuation, were reported. NMSC (incidence/100 pt-yrs of f/u: 0.10[95% CI: 0.00,0.58] vs. 0.81 [95%CI: 0.37,1.54] for GLM IV vs GLM SC) and lymphoma rates were numerically lower in GO-FURTHER vs. GO-FORWARD.
Conclusion: Overall safety profile of IV GLM in pts with RA despite MTX observed through wk 112 in GO-FURTHER was similar to that for SC GLM in a similar pt population (GO-FORWARD). Rates/100 pt-yrs (through August 15, 2012 in GO-FURTHER and wk 160 in GO-FORWARD) for events of interest such as malignancies and serious infections in GO-FURTHER were comparable to or lower than rates in GO-FORWARD.
Overall AE summary: GLM-treated patients in GO-FURTHER (IV;through wk 112) and in GO-FORWARD (SC; through week 104) |
||
|
GO-FURTHER GLM IV 2 mg/kg + MTX |
GO-FORWARD All GLM SC 50 mg +MTX or 100 mg +/- MTX |
Pts treated/ Mean duration of f/u (wks) |
584/95.9 |
434/89.9 |
AE/Serious AE/ D/c due to AE |
79.1%/18.2%/7.0% |
89.4%/22.6%/9.4% |
Overall infection/Serious infection |
49.1%/6.2% |
67.5%/6.7% |
Infusion or injection reactions |
3.5% |
8.3% |
AEs of interest in pts receiving IV or SC GLM: Incidence per 100 pt-years of follow-up (95% CI) |
||
|
GO-FURTHER (IV)a (n= 584) |
GO-FORWARD (SC) b(n=434) |
Total pt/yrs of follow-up |
958 |
1127 |
Deaths |
0.52 (0.17, 1.22) |
0.35 (0.10, 0.91) |
Sepsis |
0.42 (0.11, 1.07) |
0.71 (0.31, 1.40) |
Tuberculosis |
0.31 (0.06, 0.92) |
0.27 (0.05, 0.78) |
Opportunistic Infections |
0.42 (0.11, 1.07) |
0.27 (0.05, 0.78) |
Cellulitis |
2.19 (1.36, 3.35) |
3.28 (2.31, 4.52) |
Postbaseline ALT ↑ (>1to<3 x ULN ) |
98.86 (92.66, 105.36) |
69.02 (64.26, 74.05) |
Postbaseline ALT ↑ (≥3to<5 x ULN ) |
3.76 (2.63, 5.20) |
1.51 (0.88, 2.41) |
Postbaseline ALT ↑ (≥5 x ULN ) |
2.30 (1.44, 3.48) |
0.71 (0.31, 1.40) |
Lymphoma: |
|
|
Observed # of pts/Incidence/100 pt-yrs (95%CI)c Observed/Expected #of pts/SIR (95% CI)d |
0/0.00 (0.00, 0.31) 0/0.27/0.00 (0.00, 11.14) |
1/0.09 (0.00, 0.49) 1/0.29/3.40 (0.09, 18.94) |
Other malignancies: |
|
|
Observed # of pts/Incidence/100 pt-yrs(95% CI)c Observed/Expected #of pts/SIR (95% CI)d |
3/0.31 (0.06, 0.92) 2/6.03/0.33 (0.04, 1.20) |
5/0.44 (0.14, 1.04) 5/6.81/0.73 (0.24, 1.71) |
All malignancies: |
|
|
Observed # of pts/Incidence/100 pt-yrs (95%CI)c Observed/Expected #of pts/SIR (95% CI)d |
4/0.42 (0.11, 1.07) 2/6.28/0.32 (0.04, 1.15) |
15/1.35 (0.76, 2.23) 6/7.08/0.85 (0.31, 1.84) |
a Based on data cut-off of August 15, 2012 (GO-FURTHER).bThrough Wk 160 (GO-FORWARD). cIncludes nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). dExcludes NMSC, which are not included in the SEER database. SIR=Standardized Incidence Ratio |
Disclosure:
R. Westhovens,
Roche Pharmaceuticals,
2,
Janssen Research & Development, LLC.,
5,
Galapagos,
6,
BMS,
8;
E. C. Keystone,
Abbott Laboratories, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Bristol-Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB. ,
2,
Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Genentech Inc, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, UCB. ,
5,
Abbott Laboratories, Astrazeneca LP, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Janssen Inc., Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, UCB, Amgen.,
8;
C. O. Bingham III,
BMS, Janssen, Mesoblast, Pfizer, UCB,
2,
AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, EMD/Serrono, Genentech/Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Pfizer, UCB,
5;
E. C. Hsia,
Janssen Research and Development, LLC.,
3;
L. Kim,
Janssen Research & Development, LLC.,
3;
Y. Zhou,
Janssen Research & Development, LLC.,
3;
A. M. Mendelsohn,
Janssen Research & Development, LLC.,
3;
M. E. Weinblatt,
Janssen Research & Development, LLC.,
2.
« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-safety-of-intravenous-golimumab-and-comparison-with-subcutaneous-golimumab-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-results-through-2-years/