ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1803

Long-term Safety of Guselkumab (TREMFYA®) in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Pooled Results from 3 Randomized Clinical Trials Through up to 2 Years

Proton Rahman1, Christopher Ritchlin2, Philip Mease3, Philip S Helliwell4, Wolf-Henning Boehncke5, Iain McInnes6, May Shawi7, Anne Marilise Marrache8, Alexa Kollmeier9, Xie Xu10, Jenny Yu10, Yanli Wang10, Shihong Sheng10 and Alice Gottlieb11, 1Department of Medicine, Eastern Health and Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada, 2Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 3Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 4Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland, 6University of Glasgow, School of Medicine, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom, 7Janssen Immunology Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Toronto, ON, Canada, 8Janssen Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada, 9Janssen Research & Development, LLC, La Jolla, CA, 10Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 11Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Biologicals, clinical trial, Psoriatic arthritis, Spondylarthropathies

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster III: Psoriatic Arthritis II (1801–1835)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS), a targeted IL-23 inhibitor, demonstrated significant improvements in signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and a favorable safety profile through week (W) 24 in one Phase (Ph)21 and two Ph3 (DISCOVER [D]-1&2)2-4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In this study, we assessed GUS safety by pooling data across the 1-year (Y) Ph2, 1-Y D-1, and 2-Y D-2 RCTs.

Methods: Patients (Pts) with active PsA (≥3% BSA affected by psoriasis in Ph2; ≥3 tender/swollen joints and CRP ≥0.3 mg/dL in Ph2 and D-1; ≥5 tender/swollen joints and CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL in D-2), biologic naïve except 13/149 Ph2 and 118/381 D-1 pts who received prior 1-2 TNF inhibitors (TNFi), were randomized to subcutaneous GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, and every 8 weeks (Q8W) or placebo (PBO) in Ph2 or to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, Q8W; or PBO in D-1 & D-2. At W24, PBO pts switched to GUS 100 mg Q8W (Ph2) or Q4W (D-1 & D-2). In these pooled post-hoc analyses, adverse events (AEs; number standardized for 100 patient-years of follow-up [PY]), laboratory investigations (abnormalities classified by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs [NCI-CTCAE] grade), and injection site reactions (ISRs) were reported through W56 for the Ph2 trial, W60 for D-1, and W112 for D-2.

Results: Across the 3 RCTs, 1,229 pts with active PsA received GUS 100 mg (725 Q4W, 504 Q8W) and were followed for an average of 1.5 Y, representing 1871 PY. Incidences of AEs, serious AEs, infections, serious infections, discontinuations due to an AE, malignancies, and major adverse cardiovascular events were similar between PBO and GUS through W24. No increased rates were seen with up to 2 Y of GUS, except for a somewhat higher rate of SAEs and serious infections in the GUS 100 mg Q8W group during long-term follow-up, although confidence intervals overlapped with those seen during the PBO-controlled period (Table 1). The majority of GUS-treated pts with elevated aminotransferases and blood bilirubin had NCI-CTCAE Grade 1/2, with very few Grade 3 and no Grade 4, elevations. The proportions of pts with elevated aminotransferases at W24 were somewhat higher in the GUS Q4W vs Q8W/PBO groups; no unexpected increase was observed with longer duration of treatment. Elevations were more common in pts with vs without methotrexate (MTX) use at baseline. The proportions of pts with Grade 1 elevated bilirubin were higher in GUS vs PBO groups; few Grade 2 and no Grade 3/4 elevations were seen (Table 2). ISRs occurred in similar proportions of GUS (1%) and PBO (0.5%) pts at W24, with no disproportional increase with up to 2 Y of GUS.

Conclusion: In pts with active PsA pooled across 3 RCTs, GUS demonstrated a favorable safety profile through up to 2 Y of treatment; the GUS safety profile in PsA was comparable to that observed through up to 5 Y of GUS in pts with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.5

References

1. Deodhar A et al. Lancet. 2018;391(10136):2213

2. Ritchlin C et al. RMD Open. 2021;7(1):e001457

3. McInnes I et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(4):604

4. Rahman P et al. J Rheum. doi:10.3899/jrheum.201532

5. Griffiths CEM et al. Coastal Dermatol Symposium 2020; Oct 15–16

Table 1. Number of adverse events per 100 PY (95% CI)

Table 2. Proportions of pts (%) with clinical laboratory abnormalities according to maximum NCI-CTCAE toxicity grade and by baseline MTX use


Disclosures: P. Rahman, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6, Merck, 2, 6; C. Ritchlin, UCB, 2, 5, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, Pfizer, 2, Novartis, 2, Gilead, 2, Janssen, 2; P. Mease, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Genentech, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Gilead Sciences, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 6, GSK, 2; P. Helliwell, Pfizer Inc, 1, Novartis, 6, Janssen, 1, 6, AbbVie, 6, Galapagos, 1, Eli Lilly, 1; W. Boehncke, Leo, 2, 6, Pfizer, 5, Abbvie, 2, 6, Almirall, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; I. McInnes, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, AbbVie, 2, AstraZeneca, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6; M. Shawi, Janssen Global Services, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; A. Marrache, Janssen, Inc (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; A. Kollmeier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; X. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; J. Yu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; Y. Wang, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; S. Sheng, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; A. Gottlieb, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 2, 5, Incyte, 1, 2, 5, Janssen, 1, 2, 5, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, UCB, 1, 2, 5, Xbiotech, 1, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, 2, LEO Pharma, 1, 2, AnaptysBio, 1, 2, Avotres, 1, 2, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, Beiersdorf, 1, 2, Sun Pharmaceuticals, 1, 2, 5, Dermavant, 1, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rahman P, Ritchlin C, Mease P, Helliwell P, Boehncke W, McInnes I, Shawi M, Marrache A, Kollmeier A, Xu X, Yu J, Wang Y, Sheng S, Gottlieb A. Long-term Safety of Guselkumab (TREMFYA®) in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Pooled Results from 3 Randomized Clinical Trials Through up to 2 Years [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-safety-of-guselkumab-tremfya-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-pooled-results-from-3-randomized-clinical-trials-through-up-to-2-years/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-safety-of-guselkumab-tremfya-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-pooled-results-from-3-randomized-clinical-trials-through-up-to-2-years/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology