ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1443

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: 5-Year Results From the Phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 Study

Iain McInnes1, Koji Kato2, Marina Magrey3, Joseph Merola4, mitsumasa kishimoto5, Derek Haaland6, Ivan Lagunes7, Laura Coates8, Yanxi Liu9, Erin Mancl10, Bhumik Parikh11 and Charles Phillips12, 1University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 2Abbvie. Inc, North Chicago, IL, 3Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine/University Hospitals Cleveland, Richfield, OH, 4UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 5Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 6The Waterside Clinic, Oro Medonte, ON, Canada, 7Abbvie Inc, North Chicago, IL, 8Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom, 9Abbvie Inc, Florham Park, NJ, 10AbbVie, Chicago, IL, 11AbbVie, Hillsborough Township, NJ, 12AbbVie Inc, Princeton, NJ

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, Psoriatic arthritis, Randomized Trial

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1434–1466) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: We evaluated safety and efficacy of upadacitinib (UPA) versus adalimumab (ADA) at week 260 (5-years) from the long-term extension of SELECT-PsA 1.

Methods: Randomized patients with PsA received UPA 15mg once daily, UPA 30mg once daily, ADA 40mg every other week, or placebo for 24 weeks. At week 24, placebo groups switched to UPA15 or UPA30. Following approval of UPA15, patients on UPA30 switched to UPA15; earliest switch at week 104; data not presented). TEAEs were summarized for patients who received ≥1 dose of the drug using all 5-year data. Safety data are presented as exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs; events per 100 patient-years) and exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs; patients per 100 patient-years). Efficacy endpoints were analyzed using nonresponder imputation (NRI) and as observed (AO) (binary endpoints), or mixed-effect model repeated measures and AO (continuous endpoints; P values are nominal).

Results: 1704 patients received ≥1 dose and 983 (57.7%) completed 260 weeks. Most common reasons for discontinuation were AEs (8.4%), withdrawal of consent (6.2%), and lack of efficacy (4.7%). UPA’s safety profile through week 260 (5-years) was comparable to ADA and consistent with week 104 and 152 data. Rates of malignancy excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), VTE, and MACE were low compared to historical comparators and generally similar across treatments. Serious infection, herpes zoster, anemia, lymphopenia, creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation, and NMSC rates were higher with UPA versus ADA; serious infection, herpes zoster, anemia, neutropenia, and CPK elevation were higher with UPA30 versus UPA15. Death rates (EAERs) were the same across UPA treatment groups and similar (< 1.0 difference) with ADA; COVID-19/COVID-19 pneumonia was the most common cause. UPA15 achieved ≥20%/50%/70% improvement in ACR response criteria (ACR20/50/70) and minimal disease activity (MDA) comparable to ADA at week 260 (AO). PASI (PASI75/90/100) improvements were also comparable between UPA15 and ADA at week 260 (AO). Using the more conservative NRI, responses were comparable for UPA15 versus ADA at week 260. HAQ-DI and patient assessment of pain changes were consistent through week 260 and comparable between UPA15 versus ADA (AO). Mean change in modified total Sharp/van der Heijde Score (mTSS) at week 260 was similar across treatments.

Conclusion: In patients with PsA and inadequate response/intolerance to ≥1 non-biologic DMARD, no new safety risks were identified with UPA up to 5 years; its safety profile remained consistent with ADA. Efficacy responses were generally maintained over time and comparable to ADA at 5 years.1. McInnes I, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1227-39.2. McInnes I, et al. Rheumatol Ther. 2023;10:275-92.3. McInnes I, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 [Abstract].4. Burmester G, et al. RMD Open. 2023;9:e002735.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: I. McInnes: AbbVie, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 5, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, 6, Cabaletta, 2, 6, Causeway Therapeutics, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 6, Evelo, 2, Gilead, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, Sanofi/Regeneron, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; K. Kato: AbbVie, 3, 11; M. Magrey: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2, 5; J. Merola: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 12, Investigator, Amgen, 2, 12, Investigator, Arena, 2, Avotres, 2, Biogen, 2, 12, Investigator, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 12, Investigator, Celgene, 2, Dermavant, 2, 12, Investigator, Eli Lilly, 2, 12, Investigator, EMD Serono, 2, Janssen, 2, 12, Investigator, Leo Pharma, 2, 12, Investigator, Merck/MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 12, Investigator, Pfizer, 2, 12, Investigator, Regeneron, 2, 12, Investigator, Sanofi, 2, 12, Investigator, Sun Pharma, 2, 12, Investigator, UCB, 2, 12, Investigator; m. kishimoto: AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, 2, 6, Astellas, 2, 6, Ayumi, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Chugai, 2, 6, Daiichi-Sankyo, 2, 6, Eisai, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Johnson & Johnson, 2, 6, Kyowa Kirin, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Ono Pharma, 2, 6, Takeda, 2, 6, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; D. Haaland: AbbVie, 1, 5, 6, Adiga Life Sciences, 5, Amgen, 1, 5, 6, AstraZeneca, 1, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 5, 6, Can-Fite pharma, 5, Celgene, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, Gilead, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, 5, 6, Janssen, 1, 5, 6, Merck/MSD, 6, Novartis, 1, 5, 6, Pfizer, 1, 5, 6, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 1, 6, Sanofi Genzyme, 1, 5, 6, Takeda, 1, 6, UCB, 5, 6; I. Lagunes: AbbVie, 3, 11; L. Coates: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 6, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Domain, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Medac, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; Y. Liu: AbbVie, 3, 11; E. Mancl: AbbVie, 3, 11; B. Parikh: AbbVie, 3, 11; C. Phillips: AbbVie, 3, 11.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

McInnes I, Kato K, Magrey M, Merola J, kishimoto m, Haaland D, Lagunes I, Coates L, Liu Y, Mancl E, Parikh B, Phillips C. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: 5-Year Results From the Phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-safety-and-efficacy-of-upadacitinib-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-5-year-results-from-the-phase-3-select-psa-1-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-safety-and-efficacy-of-upadacitinib-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-5-year-results-from-the-phase-3-select-psa-1-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology