ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 545

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol over 96 Weeks in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis with and without Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Exposure

Philip J. Mease1, Roy Fleischmann2, Jurgen Wollenhaupt3, Atul A. Deodhar4, Dafna D. Gladman5, Bengt Hoepken6, Luke Peterson7 and Désirée M. van der Heijde8, 1Division of Rheumatology Research, Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2Rheumatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 3Division of Reheumatology, Schoen-Klinik Hamburg-Eilbek Teaching Hospital of the University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, 4Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, 5University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6UCB Pharma, Monheim, Germany, 7Biostatistics US Group, UCB Pharma, Raleigh-Durham, NC, 8Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, certolizumab pegol, Clinical research, Psoriatic arthritis and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Previous reports of RAPID-PsA (NCT01087788) demonstrated efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) over 48 weeks (wks) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients (pts), including pts with prior anti-TNF therapy.1 Here, we report the efficacy and safety of CZP in PsA from a 96-wk interim data cut of RAPID-PsA.

Methods

RAPID-PsA1 is double-blind and placebo (PBO)-controlled to Wk24, dose-blind to Wk48 and open-label (OL) to Wk216. Pts had active PsA and had failed ≥1 DMARD. Pts originally randomized to CZP (200mg Q2W/400mg Q4W, following 400mg loading dose [LD] at Wks 0, 2, 4) continued on assigned dose in the OL phase; PBO pts entering dose-blind phase were re-randomized to CZP LD followed by CZP 200mg Q2W or 400mg Q4W after Wk24 or, for non-responders, Wk16. We present efficacy data for pts originally randomized to CZP (combined dose regimens). Primary clinical endpoint was Wk12 ACR20 response.1 Other endpoints included ACR and PASI responses, HAQ-DI, pain and minimal disease activity (MDA)2 at Wk96, and ACR responses in pts with/without prior anti-TNF exposure. Data are shown as observed case and with imputation (NRI for categorical measures; LOCF for continuous measures). Safety set consists of pts treated with ≥1 dose of CZP to Wk96.

Results

409 pts were randomized and 273 received CZP from Wk0. 54 (19.8%) CZP pts had prior anti-TNF exposure with similar baseline (BL) characteristics to pts without. Of CZP-randomized pts, 91% completed Wk24, 87% Wk48 and 80% Wk96. ACR and MDA responses were maintained in both dosing regimens from Wk24 to Wk96 (Figure). ACR responses were similar in pts with/without prior anti-TNF exposure (Figure). Pts randomized to PBO who switched to CZP displayed rapid clinical improvements that were maintained to Wk96. In pts with ≥3% skin involvement at BL (N=166, 60.8% CZP pts) PASI responses were maintained to Wk96 (Table). Improvements in PROs were maintained to Wk96 (Change from BL at Wk24 and Wk96: HAQ-DI: -0.48 vs -0.52; pain: -28.5 vs -31.3). In the safety set (N=393) total CZP exposure was 606 pt-yrs. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 345 pts (87.8%; event rate [ER] per 100 pt-yrs=329.8) and serious AEs (SAEs) in 67 (17.0%; ER=14.5). SAEs included malignancies in 4 pts (1.0%; ER=0.7) (2 cases of breast cancer, 1 lymphoma, 1 stage 0 in situ cervix carcinoma) and serious infections in 16 pts (4.1%; ER=3.3). 6 deaths were reported in the overall 96-wk period (1.5%) (2 cardiac disorders, 1 sudden death, 1 infection, 1 breast cancer, 1 lymphoma).

Conclusion

Clinical efficacy of CZP was maintained through both the dose-blind and OL phases of RAPID-PsA. Efficacy was maintained in both dosing regimens and in both TNF-naïve and TNF-experienced pts. The safety profile was in line with previous reports from RAPID-PsA, with no new safety signals observed with increased exposure.

References:

1. Mease P.J. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65(10):S132-S133

2. Coates L. Ann Rheum 2010;69(1):48-53

 


Disclosure:

P. J. Mease,

Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BiogenIdec, BMS, Celgene, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Vertex,

2,

Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BiogenIdec, BMS, Celgene, Covagen, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Vertex,

5,

Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BiogenIdec, BMS, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB Pharma,

8;

R. Fleischmann,

Genetech Inc, Roche, Abbott, Amgen, UCB Pharma, Pfizer, BMS, Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis, MSD, Novartis, BiogenIdec, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Janssen,

2,

Roche, Abbott, Amgen, UCB Pharma, Pfizer, BMS, Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Janssen,

5;

J. Wollenhaupt,

UCB Pharma,

5,

UCB Pharm,

2;

A. A. Deodhar,

Abbott, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma,

2,

Abbott, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma,

5;

D. D. Gladman,

Abbott, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma,

2,

Abbott, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma,

5;

B. Hoepken,

UCB Pharma,

3;

L. Peterson,

UCB Pharma,

3;

D. M. van der Heijde,

AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Augurex, BMS, Celgene, Centocor, Chugai, Covagen, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen Biologics, Merck, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Schering-Plough, UCB, Vertex,

5,

Imaging Rheumatology bv,

9.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-safety-and-efficacy-of-certolizumab-pegol-over-96-weeks-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-with-and-without-prior-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitor-exposure/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology