ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 775

Long-Term Outcomes of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Initiated with Adalimumab Plus Methotrexate Compared with Methotrexate Alone Following a Targeted Treatment Approach

Roy Fleischmann1, Ronald F. van Vollenhoven2, Josef S. Smolen3, Paul Emery4, Stefan Florentinus5, Suchitrita S. Rathmann6, Hartmut Kupper7 and Arthur Kavanaugh8, 1Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, University of Texas, Dallas, TX, 2Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 3Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna and Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria, 4Medicine, Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5AbbVie, Rungis, France, 6Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, 7Immunology Development, Abbott GmbH and Co. KG, Ludwigshafen, Germany, 8UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adalimumab, randomized trials and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Comparative Efficacy and Novel Treatment Strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), anti-TNF therapy is considered following 3-6 months of failed methotrexate (MTX) treatment. Some patients (pts), particularly those with many risk factors, may benefit from earlier intervention with anti-TNF+MTX, as this combination maximizes the likelihood of response. This analysis assessed, on a group level, whether there is a long-term advantage for early RA pts treated with initial and continued adalimumab (ADA)+MTX vs those treated with initial placebo (PBO)+MTX and who either continued unaltered therapy or rapidly added ADA following an inadequate response (IR).

Methods: OPTIMA was a 78-week (wk), phase 4, randomized, controlled trial of initial ADA+MTX vs PBO+MTX in MTX-naïve pts ≥18 years, <1 year disease duration, and active RA. Therapy adjustments were made at wk 26 on the basis of achieving a target of stable low disease activity [LDA, defined for this study as DAS28(CRP) <3.2] at wks 22 and 26 (Period 1, P1): ADA+MTX-responders (R) were re-randomized to either withdraw or continue ADA (ADA Withdrawal and Continuation arms, respectively) and PBO+MTX-R continued randomized therapy (MTX Continuation arm) for an additional 52 wks (P2); IR-pts received open-label (OL) ADA+MTX during P2 (OL ADA Carry On and Rescue ADA arms). This post hoc analysis evaluated the proportion of pts who entered P2 and were in LDA, had normal function (HAQ-DI <0.5), and/or the absence of radiographic progression (ΔmTSS ≤0.5) at wk 78 by initial treatment group (ie, the ADA+MTX group includes ADA Withdrawal, Continuation, and OL Carry On arms; the PBO+MTX group includes MTX Continuation and Rescue ADA arms). To account for the full population of P1 ADA+MTX-R, those who withdrew ADA during P2 were replaced by an equivalent proportion of R from the ADA Continuation arm.

Results: Among pts who entered P2 (ADA+MTX, N=466; PBO+MTX, N=460), significantly more were in LDA, had normal function, and/or the absence of radiographic progression following 26 wks of treatment with ADA+MTX vs PBO+MTX (Table). Differences in clinical and functional outcomes between initial treatment groups disappeared following an additional 26 or 52 wks of treatment, during which time PBO+MTX-IR (n=348) were switched to OL ADA+MTX. Although the addition of OL ADA to PBO+MTX-IR slowed radiographic progression during P2, more pts who received ADA+MTX from baseline had no radiographic progression at wk 78 than pts who received initial PBO+MTX.

 

Conclusion: Early RA pts treated with PBO+MTX were able to achieve comparable long-term clinical and functional outcomes on a group level to those who began treatment with the combination of ADA+MTX, but only if therapy was optimized by the addition of ADA in PBO+MTX-IR. Still, continued ADA+MTX therapy conferred a radiographic benefit over 78 wks, although the difference did not appear to translate to an additional functional benefit.


Disclosure:

R. Fleischmann,

Abbott, Pfizer, Merck, Roche, UCB, Celgene, Centocor-Jannsen, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Lilly, and Novartis. ,

2,

Abbott, Pfizer, Merck, Roche, UCB, Celgene, Centocor-Jannsen, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Lilly, and Novartis. ,

5;

R. F. van Vollenhoven,

Abbott, BMS, Glaxo SmithKline, Human Genome Sciences, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB Pharma,

5,

Abbott, BMS, Glaxo SmithKline, Human Genome Sciences, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB Pharma,

2;

J. S. Smolen,

Abbott, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Celgene Centocor-Janssen, Glaxo, Lilly, Pfizer (Wyeth), MSD (Schering-Plough), Novo-Nordisk, Roche, Sandoz, and UCB,

2,

Abbott, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Celgene Centocor-Janssen, Glaxo, Lilly, Pfizer (Wyeth), MSD (Schering-Plough), Novo-Nordisk, Roche, Sandoz, and UCB,

5;

P. Emery,

Abbott, Merck, Pfizer, UCB, Roche, and BMS,

5;

S. Florentinus,

Abbott Laboratories,

1,

Abbott Laboratories,

3;

S. S. Rathmann,

Abbott Laboratories,

1,

Abbott Laboratories,

3;

H. Kupper,

Abbott Laboratories,

1,

Abbott Laboratories,

3;

A. Kavanaugh,

Abbott, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Celgene, Centocor-Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB,

5,

Abbott, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Celgene, Centocor-Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-outcomes-of-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-initiated-with-adalimumab-plus-methotrexate-compared-with-methotrexate-alone-following-a-targeted-treatment-approach/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology