ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 808

Long-Term Outcome of Tocilizumab for Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: Results from Part 2 of a Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Trial

John Stone1, Min Bao 2, Jian Han 2, Martin Aringer 3, Daniel Blockmans 4, Elisabeth Brouwer 5, Maria C. Cid 6, Bhaskar Dasgupta 7, Jürgen Rech 8, Carlo Salvarani 9, Robert Spiera 10 and Sebastian Unizony 1, 1Massachusetts General Hospital Rheumatology Unit, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, University Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Dresden, Germany, 4Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium, 5Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 6Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain, 7Southend University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Westcliff-on-Sea, United Kingdom, 8Department of Internal Medicine 3, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU) and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany, 9Division of Rheumatology, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy, 10Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: tocilizumab and giant cell arteritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: 3S032: Plenary I (805–809)

Session Type: Plenary Session I

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Tocilizumab (TCZ) 162 mg administered subcutaneously weekly (QW) or every-other-week (Q2W) plus 26-wk prednisone tapering resulted in higher rates of sustained glucocorticoid (GC)–free remission in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) than placebo plus 26-wk (PBO+26) or 52-wk (PBO+52) prednisone tapering in the 52-wk, double-blind, randomized controlled GiACTA trial.1 The objective of this analysis was to determine long-term safety and explore maintenance of efficacy in GCA patients in a 2-year long-term extension (part 2) of this trial.

Methods: At the end of the double-blind period, patients in clinical remission (CR) were instructed to stop double-blind TCZ treatment upon entering part 2. CR was defined as absence of flare per investigator assessment without requirement for normalization of CRP < 1 mg/dL. GCA therapy, which could include initiation/termination of open-label TCZ and/or GC, was administered at investigator’s discretion per disease status. Outcomes included maintenance of CR (no flare during part 2), flare, time to first flare, treatments received, cumulative GC dose, and safety. Treatment groups refer to originally assigned treatment (PBO or TCZ). Results: Among 250 patients treated in the double-blind period, 215 entered part 2 and 197 (92%) completed 3 years in the trial. Among the 81 TCZ QW and 36 TCZ Q2W patients in CR at wk 52, 38 (47%) and 13 (36%) patients, respectively, maintained CR during part 2. Of these 51 original TCZ patients, 33 (65%) were treatment-free (no TCZ or GC treatment), which was higher than the treatment-free proportion of original PBO patients who maintained CR in part 2 (17/38; 45%). Median time to first flare while not receiving TCZ was longer for patients in the original TCZ groups (TCZ QW, 575 days; TCZ Q2W, 428 days) than for patients in the original PBO groups (PBO+26, 162 days; PBO+52, 295 days); TCZ QW patients remained flare-free the longest (Figure 1). Retreatment with TCZ (with or without GC) for flare was effective for restoring CR in part 2. Cumulative GC dose over the 3 years was lowest in the TCZ QW group (median dose [mg/day]: TCZ QW, 2647; TCZ Q2W, 3782; PBO+26, 5248; PBO+52, 5323). Rates of serious adverse events per 100 patient-years over 3 years (double-blind period + part 2) were comparable for patients who never received TCZ (23.2) and those who did receive ≥1 dose of TCZ (25.4), and rates of serious infections were 4.6 and 3.5 per 100 patient-years, respectively. Additional results will be presented for original PBO patients.

Conclusion: Nearly half of patients treated with TCZ QW maintained CR for the entirety of part 2, but flares still occurred in the remaining patients once they discontinued TCZ treatment. Among patients who maintained CR in part 2, higher proportions of those originally assigned to TCZ were treatment-free compared with those originally assigned to PBO. Retreatment with TCZ restored CR in patients who experienced flare. Cumulative GC dose over 3 years was lower in patients originally assigned to TCZ than in those originally assigned to PBO. No new safety signals were observed with TCZ exposure in GCA patients during the 3-year study.

Reference: 1. Stone JH et al. N Engl J Med 2017;377:317-328.


Disclosure: J. Stone, Genentech, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Xencor, 2, 5; M. Bao, Genentech, 1, 3, Genentech, Inc., 3, Roche, 4; J. Han, Genentech, 1, 3, Genentech, Inc., 3; M. Aringer, Abbvie, 5, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Chugai, 5, 8, Hexal, 8, HEXAL, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Sanofi-Aventis, 5, 8, UCB, 8; D. Blockmans, None; E. Brouwer, Roche, 5, 8; M. Cid, Roche, 9; B. Dasgupta, Abbvie, 2, BMS, 5, GSK, 5, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Roche Chugai, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, Sanofi Aventis, 5, Sanofi-Aventis, 5; J. Rech, AbbVie, 8, Biogen, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Chugai, 5, MSD, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Roche, 5; C. Salvarani, None; R. Spiera, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, ChemoCentryx, 2, 5, Chemocentryx, 2, Corbus, 2, CSL Behring, 5, Cytori, 2, Formation Biologics, 2, Genentech, Inc., 2, Genzyme/Sanofi, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 2, Janssen, 5, Mitsubishi, 5, Roche, 2, Roche Genetech, 2, 5, Roche/Genetech, 2, 5, Roche-Genentech, 2, 5, Roche-Genetech, 2, 5, Sanofi, 5, Sanofi-Aventis, 5; S. Unizony, Genentech, Inc., 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stone J, Bao M, Han J, Aringer M, Blockmans D, Brouwer E, Cid M, Dasgupta B, Rech J, Salvarani C, Spiera R, Unizony S. Long-Term Outcome of Tocilizumab for Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: Results from Part 2 of a Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-outcome-of-tocilizumab-for-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis-results-from-part-2-of-a-randomized-controlled-phase-3-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-outcome-of-tocilizumab-for-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis-results-from-part-2-of-a-randomized-controlled-phase-3-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology