ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2606

Long-Term Inhibition of Radiographic Progression with Originator Adalimumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis with or without Radiographic Damage at Baseline

Laura C. Coates1, Philip J. Mease2, Kun Chen3, Maja Hojnik4, Wendell Valdecantos3, Pranav Sheth5, Daniel Aletaha6 and Fabiana Ganz7, 1Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Swedish Medical Centre and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 3AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 4AbbVie, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 5Group Health Associates, Trihealth, Cincinnati, OH, 6Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 7AbbVie AG, Baar, Switzerland

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adalimumab, psoriatic arthritis and quality of life

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Adalimumab (ADA) inhibited radiographic progression in patients (pts) with moderate to severe PsA in the ADEPT study and its open label extension (OLE). These post‑hoc analyses evaluated long-term inhibition of radiographic progression and impact on quality of life (QoL) in ADA treated pts with respect to the presence or absence of baseline (BL) radiographic damage.

Methods:

Pts who completed the ADEPT study (phase 3, double-blind, placebo [PBO] ‑controlled, 24‑week [wk] study in TNF inhibitor naive PsA pts) were eligible to enroll in the 120‑wk OLE with ADA 40 mg every other wk (eow). Only pts who continued into the OLE were included in these analyses of observed data. Radiographic damage at BL (BLrd) was defined as a modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) >0.5; radiographic progression was defined as a change (Δ) from BL in mTSS by >0.5. Radiographic progression and changes in general health (SF-36), fatigue (FACIT‑F) and physical function (HAQ-DI) were evaluated until Wk 144 in pts grouped by presence or absence of BLrd and treatment (PBO/ADA or ADA/ADA in the ADEPT/OLE studies, respectively).

Results:

BLrd was observed in 81% (n=231/285) of the enrolled pts. At Wk 144, 49.8% (n=115/231) of those with BLrd and 51.9% (28/54) of those without BLrd, did not progress radiographically. Radiographic progression by Wk144 was significantly smaller in pts without than with BLrd (mean ΔmTSS from BL: 0.85 vs. 2.91, p<0.01). Further, in pts without BLrd who initially received ADA, fewer progressed (Wk 144: 12% vs. 24%), with significantly less mean radiographic progression up to Wk 144 (mean ΔmTSS from BL: 0.49 vs. 1.12, p<0.05). Mean radiographic progression through Wk 144 did not significantly differ between pts initially receiving ADA or PBO who had BLrd (mean ΔmTSS from BL: 3.41 vs. 2.43, NS). At Wk 144, there were no statistically significant differences in the mean changes from BL in HAQ-DI, FACIT-F, and SF-36 (PCS and MCS) in pts with or without BLrd (-0.40 vs. -0.33, 6.11 vs. 6.45, 7.50 vs. 7.98, and 2.88 vs. 3.44, NS). However, pts who received ADA compared with PBO exhibited significantly greater improvement in physical function (both SF-36 PCS and HAQ-DI, p<0.01) by wk 24 regardless of BLrd (Table).

Conclusion:

Moderate to severe PsA pts with BLrd experienced more long-term radiographic progression than those without. Interestingly, among pts without BLrd, initial treatment with ADA compared with PBO resulted in 50% fewer pts with radiographic progression and significantly lower mean radiographic progression through 144 weeks, whereas no long-term difference has been observed for physical function and QoL parameters.

Table: Summary of change from baseline in the Quality of Life (QoL) parameters of SF-36, FACIT-F and HAQ-DI

Change from BL in SF-36 (PCS)†

With BL radiographic damage (N=231)

Without BL radiographic damage (N=54)

Visits

PBO/ADA
(N=116)

ADA/ADA
(N=115)

p value

Visits

PBO/ADA
(N=31)

ADA/ADA
(N=23)

p value

Wk 24

1.94±9.6

8.64±9.1

<0.001

Wk 24

-0.49±8.7

11.42±11.9

<0.001

Wk 144

7.13±11.2

7.88±11.4

NS

Wk 144

8.6±10.2

7.06±13.1

NS

Change from BL in SF-36 (MCS)†

With BL radiographic damage (N=231)

Without BL radiographic damage (N=54)

Visits

PBO/ADA
(N=116)

ADA/ADA
(N=115)

p value

Visits

PBO/ADA
(N=31)

ADA/ADA
(N=23)

p value

Wk 24

-0.29±11.2

2.26±9.8

NS

Wk 24

1.86±9.1

0.87±7.9

NS

Wk 144

3.43±11.5

2.32±10.7

NS

Wk 144

4.77±10.7

1.57±8.6

NS

Change from BL in FACIT-F††

With BL radiographic damage (N=231)

Without BL radiographic damage (N=54)

Visits

PBO/ADA
(N=115)

ADA/ADA
(N=115)

p value

Visits

PBO/ADA
(N=31)

ADA/ADA
(N=22)

p value

Wk 24

-0.08±10.1

7.08±9.6

<0.001

Wk 24

0.90±8.1

6.86±12.7

NS

Wk 144

5.41±10.1

6.81±11.1

NS

Wk 144

7.19±10.2

5.41±11.9

NS

Change from BL in HAQ-DI†††

With BL radiographic damage (N=231)

Without BL radiographic damage (N=54)

Visits

PBO/ADA
(N=115)

ADA/ADA
(N=115)

p value

Visits

PBO/ADA
(N=31)

ADA/ADA
(N=22)

p value

Wk 24

-0.11±0.4

-0.41±0.5

<0.001

Wk 24

-0.04±0.4

-0.37±0.4

<0.01

Wk 144

-0.4±0.6

-0.40±0.5

NS

Wk 144

-0.36±0.6

-0.29±0.4

NS

†higher SF-36 scores indicate better overall health; ††higher FACIT-F scores indicate lower fatigue; †††lower HAQ-DI scores indicate lower disability or better function. P values are from comparison of means between PBO/ADA and ADA/ADA using T‑test.

ADA: originator adalimumab; BL: Baseline; FACIT-F: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale; HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; MCS: Mental Component Summary; N: number of patients; PCS: Physical Component Summary; PBO: placebo; SF-36: Short Form Health Survey comprising of 36 questions; Wk: week


Disclosure: L. C. Coates, Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prothena, Sun Pharma and UCB, 2, 5, 9; P. J. Mease, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers, Celgene, Galapagos, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN and UCB, 2, 5, 9; K. Chen, AbbVie Inc., 1, 3; M. Hojnik, AbbVie Inc., 1, 3; W. Valdecantos, AbbVie Inc., 1, 3; P. Sheth, AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Lilly, and Novartis, 2, 5, 9; D. Aletaha, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Medac, UCB, Mitsubishi/Tanabe, Janssen, and Roche, 2, 5, 9; F. Ganz, AbbVie Inc., 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Coates LC, Mease PJ, Chen K, Hojnik M, Valdecantos W, Sheth P, Aletaha D, Ganz F. Long-Term Inhibition of Radiographic Progression with Originator Adalimumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis with or without Radiographic Damage at Baseline [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-inhibition-of-radiographic-progression-with-originator-adalimumab-in-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-psoriatic-arthritis-with-or-without-radiographic-damage-at-baseline/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-inhibition-of-radiographic-progression-with-originator-adalimumab-in-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-psoriatic-arthritis-with-or-without-radiographic-damage-at-baseline/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology