ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1648

Long-Term Clinical, Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes Based on RAPID3 Responses with Tofacitinib at 6 Months

Vibeke Strand1, Martin J Bergman2, Eun Bong Lee3, Yusuf Yazici4, Bethanie Wilkinson5, Liza Takiya6, Gene Wallenstein5, Chuanbo Zang7 and Eustratios Bananis7, 1Biopharmaceutical Consultant, Portola Valley, CA, 2Taylor Hospital, Ridley Park, PA, 3Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 4New York University, Hospital of Joint Diseases, New York, NY, 5Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 6Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, 7Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Patient outcomes and tofacitinib

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient [Pt] Index Data 3) is a pooled index of the three RA core data set pt-reported outcomes (PROs): function, pain, and pt global assessment of disease activity. We compared clinical outcomes, radiographic progression, and PROs at Month 24 in pts achieving remission, low, moderate, and high disease activity (REM, LDA, MDA, and HDA) based on RAPID3 at Month 6.

Methods: ORAL Start (NCT01039688) was a 2-year, Phase 3 randomized controlled trial in which MTX-naïve pts with RA received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), tofacitinib 10 mg BID, or MTX titrated to 20 mg/week over 8 weeks. RAPID3 scores were calculated at Months 6 and 24 for pts with radiographs at both time points. To calculate RAPID3 scores, each of the 3 individual measures (PtGA visual analog scale [VAS], pain [VAS] and HAQ‑DI were scored from 0–10 for a total of 30, and divided by 3 to give an adjusted 0–10 score. Outcomes assessed at Month 24 included REM (defined as ≤1), LDA (>1–≤2), MDA (>2–≤4), and HDA (>4) rates based on RAPID3; change from baseline (CFB) in RAPID3, CDAI, and modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS); and proportion of pts with no radiographic progression based on CFB in mTSS ≤0 and HAQ-DI <0.5 (defined as normative).

Results: Pts with RAPID3 HDA at Month 6 had higher baseline RAPID3 scores than those achieving REM/LDA (Table). At Month 6, 24.6%, 32.5%, and 14.1% of pts receiving tofacitinib 5 mg BID, tofacitinib 10 mg BID, and MTX achieved REM, respectively; 19.3%, 20.9%, and 17.9% LDA; 33.2%, 26.2%, and 36.5% MDA; and 22.8%, 20.4%, and 31.4% HDA. A higher proportion of patients were in RAPID3 REM and LDA with tofacitinib vs MTX. Regardless of treatment group, the majority of pts who achieved a specific response at Month 6 maintained or improved their responses at Month 24. CFB in RAPID3 and CDAI at Month 24 was greatest for pts who were in RAPID3 REM/LDA at Month 6. In each treatment group, patients in REM/LDA at Month 6 were more likely to achieve mTSS ≤0 at Month 24 than those with RAPID3 HDA at Month 6. Overall, regardless of RAPID3 category, a higher proportion of pts receiving tofacitinib than MTX had mTSS ≤0. Furthermore, CFB in mTSS at Month 24 with tofacitinib was generally similar across RAPID3 categories; with MTX, it was higher for patients with RAPID3 MDA and HDA. The proportion of pts with normative HAQ-DI scores at Month 24 was highest for pts achieving RAPID3 REM at Month 6, and lowest for those in RAPID3 HDA at Month 6, for each treatment group.

Conclusion: The majority of pts who attained a RAPID3 response at 6 months maintained that response at 24 months. More pts achieving RAPID3 REM or LDA at Month 6 were radiographic non-progressors or had normative HAQ-DI scores at Month 24, compared with those in RAPID3 MDA or HDA.


Disclosure: V. Strand, None; M. J. Bergman, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, Novartis, Celgene, 5,AbbVie, Novartis, Celgene, 8,BMS, Merck, Pfizer, 1; E. B. Lee, Pfizer Inc, 5; Y. Yazici, BMS, Celgene, Genentech, 2,BMS, Celgene, Genentech, 5; B. Wilkinson, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; L. Takiya, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; G. Wallenstein, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; C. Zang, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; E. Bananis, Pfizer Inc, 3,Pfizer Inc, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Strand V, Bergman MJ, Lee EB, Yazici Y, Wilkinson B, Takiya L, Wallenstein G, Zang C, Bananis E. Long-Term Clinical, Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes Based on RAPID3 Responses with Tofacitinib at 6 Months [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-clinical-radiographic-and-patient-reported-outcomes-based-on-rapid3-responses-with-tofacitinib-at-6-months/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-clinical-radiographic-and-patient-reported-outcomes-based-on-rapid3-responses-with-tofacitinib-at-6-months/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology