ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L22

Long-Term (104-Week) Safety and Efficacy of Monotherapy with Apremilast in DMARD-Naïve Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial and Open-Label Extension (PALACE 4)

Alvin Wells1, Christopher Edwards2, Adewale O. Adebajo3, Alan J. Kivitz4, Paul Bird5, Kamal Shah6, ChiaChi Hu6, Randall M. Stevens6 and Jacob A. Aelion7, 1Rheumatology & Immunotherapy Center, Franklin, WI, 2University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, 3University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom, 4Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 5Combined Rheumatology Practice, Sydney, Australia, 6Celgene Corporation, Warren, NJ, 7West Tennessee Research Institute, Jackson, TN

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: ACR Late-breaking Abstract Poster Presentations

Session Type: Late-Breaking Abstracts

Background/Purpose: Apremilast (APR) is an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor that helps regulate the immune response that causes joint inflammation and other manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), including skin disease. PALACE 4 compared the efficacy and safety of APR monotherapy with placebo (PBO) in patients with active PsA who were DMARD-naïve.

Methods: Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to PBO, APR 20 mg BID (APR20), or APR 30 mg BID (APR30). Patients whose swollen and tender joint counts (SJC/TJC) had not improved by ≥20% at Week 16 were considered non-responders and were required to be re-randomized (1:1) to APR20 or APR30 if they were initially randomized to PBO, or continued on their initial APR dose. At Week 24, all remaining PBO patients were re-randomized to APR20 or APR30. Double-blind treatment continued to Week 52; patients could continue to receive APR during an open-label, long-term safety phase extending up to 4 years. We report the long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients treated for up to 2 years in PALACE 4.

Results: 527 patients were randomized and received ≥1 dose of study medication (PBO: n=176; APR20: n=175; APR30: n=176). At Week 52, a modified ACR20 response was achieved by 53.4% (70/131) and 58.7% (81/138) of patients continually treated with APR20 or APR30 from BL, respectively.; approximately 84% of patients completing 1 year of APR treatment were maintained on therapy at the time of data cutoff during their second year of APR exposure. In patients receiving APR from BL, improvements were sustained over 104 weeks for multiple end points (Table 1), including modified ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 responses, median % change in SJC/TJC, mean change in HAQ-DI, % of patients with HAQ-DI exceeding the MCID threshold of ≥0.30, MASES, dactylitis severity scores, and PASI-50/PASI-75 responses. Consistent results were demonstrated in patients randomized to PBO at BL and re-randomized to APR20 or APR30 at Week 16 or Week 24 who completed Week 104. Most AEs were mild/moderate in severity between Weeks >52 and ≤104 and in general, no change in the types of AEs and no increase in the incidence or severity of AEs was seen with longer term exposure (Table 2). Diarrhea and nausea occurred at lower rates in Weeks >52 to ≤104 vs Weeks 0 to ≤52.

Conclusion: Over 104 weeks, APR monotherapy demonstrated sustained response and improvements in PsA signs and symptoms, enthesitis, dactylitis, physical function, and psoriasis. The ACR20 response was 57% for patients receiving APR30 therapy for 2 years. APR continued to demonstrate an acceptable safety profile and was generally well tolerated.

 

Table 1. Outcomes at Week 52 and Week 104 (Data as Observed)

 

Week 52

Week 104

 

APR20

n=132*

APR30

n=139*

APR20

n=106*

APR30

n=112*

ACR20, n/m (%)

70/131 (53.4)

81/138 (58.7)

68/105 (64.8)

63/110 (57.3)

ACR50, n/m (%)

35/129 (27.1)

44/138 (31.9)

42/105 (40.0)

41/110 (37.3)

ACR70, n/m (%)

18/131 (13.7)

25/138 (18.1)

29/104 (27.9)

21/111 (18.9)

SJC, median % change

-89.4

-100.0

-100.0

-100.0

TJC, median % change

-67.1

-66.7

-77.2

-72.6

HAQ-DI (0-3), mean change

-0.32

-0.39

-0.37

-0.40

HAQ-DI MCID, ≥0.30µ, n/m (%)

64/132 (48.5)

68/139 (48.9)

56/106 (52.8)

56/112 (50.0)

PASI-50, n/m (%)‡

48/78 (61.5)

51/91 (56.0)

39/64 (60.9)

44/72 (61.1)

PASI-75, n/m (%)‡

32/78 (41.0)

29/91 (31.9)

30/64 (46.9)

28/72 (38.9)

MASES=0, n/m (%)#

36/91 (39.6)

39/85 (45.9)

43/72 (59.7)

37/63 (58.7)

Dactylitis=0, n/m (%)¶

48/70 (68.6)

44/64 (68.8)

47/57 (82.5)

42/50 (84.0)

n/m=number of responders/number of patients with sufficient data for evaluation. MASES mean count at baseline=4.1 (APR20) and 3.7 (APR30). Dactylitis mean count at baseline=3.3 (APR20) and 3.5 (APR30).

*The n reflects the number of patients who were randomized to APR20 and APR30 at BL and had data available at the specific time point; actual number of patients available for each end point may vary.

µPre-specified MCID threshold, based on the literature (Mease PJ, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63[Suppl 1]:391) at the time of protocol and analysis.

‡Examined among patients with psoriasis involvement of the body surface area ≥3% at baseline and data at the specific time point.

#Examined among patients with enthesitis at baseline and data at the specific time point.

¶Examined among patients with dactylitis at baseline and data at the specific time point.

 

Table 2. Summary of AEs

 

APR-Exposure Period*

Weeks 0 to ≤52

APR-Exposure Period*

Weeks >52 to ≤104

 

Apremilast

Apremilast

Patients, n (%)

APR20

n=252

APR30

n=252

APR20

n=177

APR30

n=201

≥1 AE

154 (61.1)

165 (65.5)

87 (49.2)

101 (50.2)

≥1 serious AE

18 (7.1)

9 (3.6)

10 (5.6)

10 (5.0)

≥1 serious infection

2 (0.8)

2 (0.8)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

AE leading to drug withdrawal

14 (5.6)

13 (5.2)

3 (1.7)

7 (3.5)

Death

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

AEs in ≥5% of patients, any treatment group, n (%)

Diarrhea

24 (9.5)

28 (11.1)

6 (3.4)

4 (2.0)

Nausea

20 (7.9)

35 (13.9)

3 (1.7)

4 (2.0)

Headache

8 (3.2)

24 (9.5)

2 (1.1)

2 (1.0)

Upper respiratory tract infection

10 (4.0)

15 (6.0)

9 (5.1)

9 (4.5)

*Includes all patients who received APR during the time interval relative to the start of APR administration.

 



Disclosure:

A. Wells,

Celgene Corporation,

2;

C. Edwards,

Celgene Corporation, Pfizer Inc, Roche, and Samsung,

2,

Celgene Corporation, Pfizer Inc, Roche, and Samsung,

5,

Abbott, Glaxo-SmithKline, Pfizer Inc, and Roche,

8;

A. O. Adebajo,
None;

A. J. Kivitz,

Amgen, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB,

2,

Amgen, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

8;

P. Bird,

Celgene Corporation,

2;

K. Shah,

Celgene Corporation,

1,

Celgene Corporation,

3;

C. Hu,

Celgene Corporation,

3,

Celgene Corporation,

1;

R. M. Stevens,

Celgene Corporation,

1,

Celgene Corporation,

3;

J. A. Aelion,

Ardea, Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Centocor, Galapagos, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Human Genome Sciences, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Mesoblast, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc, Roche, UCB Biosciences, Sanofi-Aventis, Taked,

2,

Ardea, Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Centocor, Galapagos, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Human Genome Sciences, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Mesoblast, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc, Roche, UCB Biosciences, Sanofi-Aventis, Taked,

5,

AbbVie, Amgen, and UCB,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-104-week-safety-and-efficacy-of-monotherapy-with-apremilast-in-dmard-naive-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-a-phase-3-randomized-controlled-trial-and-open-label-extension-palace-4/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology