ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 435

It Takes Two, an Interdisciplinary Approach to Increasing Hydroxychloroquine Screening Adherence

Christina Downey1, Tombra Govina1 and Eric Newman2, 1Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, 2Department of Rheumatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Hydroxychloroquine

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a widely used rheumatologic drug that carries a risk for irreversible retinal toxicity. The incidence of adverse effect increases to greater than 1% beyond the five year mark and screening is recommended annually beyond this time. This risk is mitigated through screening exams; 10-2 visual field testing (VF) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). In our practice setting, several visits to ophthalmology are needed to complete the screening. First the patient makes an appointment for consultation with the ophthalmologist, who then orders the testing to be done at a later date and finally the results are reviewed with the ophthalmologist.

Methods:   To analyze the problem, the electronic medical record (EMR) was reviewed to identify the patients who have been on HCQ for five years or more. These patients were then cross-referenced with system procedure codes for the American Academy of Ophthalmology recommended monitoring options for HCQ related retinal toxicity in addition to the 10-2 visual field testing (VF) and (SD-OCT). Letters were sent to patients with brief education and a request to schedule an appointment. The investigators collaborated with the ophthalmology department to create a work flow for HCQ screening. Schedulers were educated about methods of screening and coached to schedule the required testing without an initial ophthalmology visit. This process streamlined the usual ophthalmology scheduling process, which involves seeing the ophthalmologist initially followed by a return visit(s) for the recommended screening and a return visit for test review.

Results:   Of the 183 patients on HCQ longer than 5 years, 58.4% have not been screened. Chart review unearthed 183 patients on HCQ longer than five years. 148 of these patients did not have billing codes for screening tests in the EMR. Manual chart review revealed an additional 41 screened patients. Overall, the increase in monitoring for patients within the system was increased by 41.8%.  

Conclusion:   The pre-intervention process for HCQ monitoring was prohibitive for patients to receive timely monitoring. When patients called the ophthalmology scheduling department they were first scheduled with an ophthalmologist to establish the goal for the appointment. This initial visit is unnecessary if the only purpose of the visit is HCQ screening, as the guidelines are very specific. Further, the wait time to see an ophthalmologist is approximately three months or longer. There is additional wait time for an appointment for the visual field and SD-OCT testing post appointment. Tests meant to be performed annually could take four to six months to schedule and complete. Patients who identify themselves as requiring an ophthalmology appointment for the sole purpose of HCQ monitoring should be scheduled immediately for VF and SD-OCT without an initial visit with an ophthalmologist. The cumbersome appointment process was unknown to rheumatologists. It was only in working in an interdisciplinary fashion that the process was able to be more patient centered and timely.


Disclosure: C. Downey, None; T. Govina, None; E. Newman, xG Health Solutions, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Downey C, Govina T, Newman E. It Takes Two, an Interdisciplinary Approach to Increasing Hydroxychloroquine Screening Adherence [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/it-takes-two-an-interdisciplinary-approach-to-increasing-hydroxychloroquine-screening-adherence/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/it-takes-two-an-interdisciplinary-approach-to-increasing-hydroxychloroquine-screening-adherence/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology