ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 542

Is There Any Difference in RA Patients for Methotrexate Use Vs. Leflunomide Use As a Concomitant Treatment with Biological and Targeted Synthetic Dmards in Turkbio Registry?

Nevsun Inanc1, Gulsen Ozen2, Yasemin Yalçınkaya1, Ediz Dalkilic3, Suleyman Serdar Koca4, Gerçek Can5, Ahmet Karatas6, Yavuz Pehlivan7, Ayten Yazici8, Ayse Cefle9, Abdurrahman Tufan10, Servet Akar11, Soner Senel12, Burak Oz13, Nurullah Akkoc14 and Fatos Onen15, 1Departement of İnternal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, 2Rheumatology, Marmara University, School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Istanbul, Turkey, 3Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Uludag University, School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Bursa, Turkey, 4Department of Rheumatology, Firat University School of Medicine, Elazig, Turkey, 5Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey, 6Department of Rheumatology, Firat University, School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Elazig, Turkey, 7Department of Rheumatology, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey, 8Rheumatology, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey, 9Rheumatology, Kocaeli University, School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Kocaeli, Turkey, 10Internal Medicine-Rheumatology, Gazi University Medical School, Rheumatology, Ankara, Turkey, 11Rheumatology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Izmir, Turkey, 12Rheumatology, Kayseri Erciyes University, School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Kayseri, Turkey, 13Rheumatology, Firat University, School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Elazig, Turkey, 14Rheumatology, Private Practice, Rheumatology, İzmir, Turkey, 15Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologic agents, DMARDs and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster I: Comorbidities and Adverse Events; Efficacy and Safety of Small Molecules

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: TURKBIO registry is the Turkish version of Danish DANBIO rheumatologic database which has been established in 2011. Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, disease type, disease duration, and previous or current treatment with conventional (csDMARD) and targeted synthetic (tsDMARD), and biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) were collected. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety status of methotrexate (MTX) vs. leflunomide (LEF) use as a concomitant treatment with bDMARDs and tsDMARD in this registry.

Methods: Frequencies of achievement of remission or remission+low disease activity (LDA) at the 6th month of bDMARD or tsDMARD treatment were compared between patients who were on these medications with MTX vs. LEF as a concomitant treatment. Similarly, patients who were on TNF inhibitors (TNFi), abatacept (ABA), rituximab (RTX), tocilizumab (TCZ), and tofacitinib (TOFA) with MTX vs. LEF were also assessed separately for the achievement of remission and remission+LDA. Drug survival and switch rates of bDMARDs and tsDMARD treatments either with MTX or LEF were compared. The adverse effects with MTX and LEF concomitant use were evaluated as well.

Results:

The study included 725 bDMARD or tsDMARD receiving RA patients from 8 participating centers of the TURKBIO registry. Of these patients, 462 (63.7%) were receiving concomitant MTX and 263 (36.3%) LEF. Demographic findings are given in the Table. Achievement of remission and remission+LDA at the 6th month of bDMARD or tsDMARD initiation was similar in concomitant MTX vs LEF groups (51.4% vs. 53%, P=0.683). When each bDMARD and tsDMARD was evaluated separately, achievement of remission were again similar in MTX and LEF concomitant users (TNFi: 53% vs. 54%; ABA: 50% vs. 59%; RTX: 53% vs. 61%; TCZ: 42% vs. 35%; P>0.05 for all). For TOFA, although remission+LDA rate was numerically higher in MTX concomitant group than LEF group (42% vs. 21%), the difference was not statistically significant due to the smaller sample size of TOFA (N=33). The results were similar for all DMARD groups when remission was evaluated alone. Drug survival (17±12 vs. 16±11 months, p>0.05 ) and drug discontinuation (42,2 vs 38, p>0.05 ) rates of bDMARDs or tsDMARD were also not different in MTX vs. LEF concomitant users. Adverse effects rate (19.5% vs 20.5%, p>0.05) were similar between MTX vs. LEF concomitant users as well.

Conclusion: Achievement of remission or remission+LDA was not different with the concomitant use of MTX vs. LEF with any bDMARD or tsDMARD treatment in RA patients with a similar safety profile. LEF might be an alternative as a concomitant DMARD in MTX-intolerant RA patients initiating bDMARDs or tsDMARD.

Table. Demographic findings of patients.

Sex, n (%)

Female

596 (82,2)

Male

129 (17,8)

Age, Median (Q1-Q3)

55 (45-62)

Age, Mean±SD

54±13

Disease duration, Ortanca (Q1-Q3)

12 (8-17)

Disease duration, Ort±SD

13±8

Biological and targeted synthetic drugs, n (%)

TNFi*

354 (48,8)

RITUXIMAB

144 (19,9)

ABATACEPT

127 (17,5)

TOCILIZUMAB

61 (8,4)

TOFACITINIB

36 (5,0)

ANAKINRA

3 (0,4)

Biological+MTX, n (%)

462 (63,7)

Biological+LEF, n (%)

263 (36,3)

*TNFi: ETANERCEPT, ADALIMUMAB, CERTOLIZUMAB, GOLIMUMAB, INFLIXIMAB, REMSIMA.



Disclosure: N. Inanc, None; G. Ozen, None; Y. Yalçınkaya, None; E. Dalkilic, AbbVie, 2,AbbVie, MSD, Roche, UCB and Pfizer, 9; S. S. Koca, None; G. Can, None; A. Karatas, None; Y. Pehlivan, None; A. Yazici, None; A. Cefle, None; A. Tufan, None; S. Akar, None; S. Senel, None; B. Oz, None; N. Akkoc, None; F. Onen, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Inanc N, Ozen G, Yalçınkaya Y, Dalkilic E, Koca SS, Can G, Karatas A, Pehlivan Y, Yazici A, Cefle A, Tufan A, Akar S, Senel S, Oz B, Akkoc N, Onen F. Is There Any Difference in RA Patients for Methotrexate Use Vs. Leflunomide Use As a Concomitant Treatment with Biological and Targeted Synthetic Dmards in Turkbio Registry? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-there-any-difference-in-ra-patients-for-methotrexate-use-vs-leflunomide-use-as-a-concomitant-treatment-with-biological-and-targeted-synthetic-dmards-in-turkbio-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-there-any-difference-in-ra-patients-for-methotrexate-use-vs-leflunomide-use-as-a-concomitant-treatment-with-biological-and-targeted-synthetic-dmards-in-turkbio-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology