ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1410

Is the Self-Assessment of Disease Activity (auto-DAS28) By Patients a Feasible and Acceptable Measure over the Long Term in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)? Three-Year Follow-up of a Nurse-Led Program in 771 Patients with Established RA

Laure Gossec1, Frantz Foissac2, Martin Soubrier3, Anna Molto4, Françoise Fayet5, Thomas Bardin6, Francis Berenbaum7, A Cantagrel8, Marie Hélène Cerato9, Gerard H. Chales10, Isabelle Chary-Valckenaere11, Bernard Combe12, Emmanuelle Dernis Labous13, Liana Euller-Ziegler14, Rene-Marc Flipo15, Philippe Gaudin16, Melanie Gilson17, Sandrine Guis18, Xavier Mariette19, Gaël Mouterde20, Sophie Pouplin21, Pascal Richette22, Alain Saraux23, Thierry Schaeverbeke24, Jean Sibilia25 and Maxime Dougados26, 1Rheumatology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France, 2COMEDRA working group, Paris, France, 3Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, CHU Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 4Hopital Cochin, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France, 5Rheumatology, CHU Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 6Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France, 7Rheumatology dept, APHP St-Antoine hospital, Univ Paris 06, Paris, France, Paris, France, 8Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, France, 9University Hospital, Toulouse, France, 10CHU RENNES, Rennes, France, 11University Hospital, Nancy, France, 12Département Rhumatologie, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France, 13Le Mans Hospital, Le Mans, France, 14Rheumatology, Nice, France, 15Rheumatology, University Hospital, Lille, France, 16Rheumatology, Grenoble University Hospital, France, Grenoble, France, 17Hopital Sud, Grenoble, France, 18Rheumatology 1, CRMBM-CEMEREM 7339, Aix-Marseille Université, AP-HM, CNRS, Marseilles, France, 19Rheumatology, Rheumatology department, Bicetre Hospital, Paris-Sud University, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France, 20Rheumatology Department, Hopital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France, 21Rheumatology Department & Inserm 905, Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital & Inserm 905, Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, Rouen, France, 22Rhumatologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France, 23Rheumatology Department, CHU de la Cavale Blanche, Brest Cedex, France, 24Rheumatology, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, 25Department of Rheumatology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France, 26Cochin Hospital and Paris 05 University, Paris, France

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: patient engagement, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and self-management

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with RA can be trained in self-assessment of disease activity by a self-assessment of their joints and calculation of the Disease activity Score 28 (DAS28) (ref). Objective: To assess if such an auto-DAS assessment is a feasible measure over the long-term (i.e., do patients adhere to such an assessment?) and to determine the characteristics of patients related to adherence to auto-DAS.

Methods: This was an open long term (2-4 years) extension of the 6 month randomized controlled COMEDRA trial of patients with definite, stable RA. Patients were trained to perform auto-DAS by a nurse, using a video and teaching of self-assessment of joints (the training took approximately 30 minutes) and nurses provided the advice to perform the auto-DAS regularly in a dedicated booklet. 2-4 years after the end of the trial, patients were seen in a face-to-face interview with a nurse and the frequency of auto-DAS was assessed through the auto-DAS booklet and if unavailable, from patient questioning. Adherence to auto-DAS was defined as the performance of at least one auto-DAS more than 6 months after the end of the trial. Characteristics of adherent versus non adherent patients were compared by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and included demographic and disease activity variables as well as the centre (higher versus lower than median inclusion number).

Results: Of the 970 recruited patients, 771 (79.5%) were followed up 3 years and had available data regarding auto-DAS: mean (±SD) age 61 (±11) years, median [IQR] disease duration 15 [9 – 23] years; 615 (80%) were women and 82% had received a biologic. The mean (±SD) baseline and 3-year DAS28 scores were respectively 3.1±1.3 and 2.8±1.4. After 3 years, 354 (46%) patients were adherent to auto-DAS (i.e., had at least one auto-DAS completed more than 6 months after the end of the trial). For adherent patients the median [IQR] number of auto-DAS performed was 5.4 [1.7 – 12.8] overall, i.e. 2.3 [0.8 – 5.9] per year. However among the adherent population, the number of patients who completed their autoDAS booklet at least once per year decreased over time, with 351 (99%), 162 (46%) and 118 (33%) patients respectively for 2012, 2013 and 2014 (p<0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, only larger inclusion centres were significantly associated to an adherent behaviour (OR [95% CI] 2.9 [2.0 – 4.1], p<0.0001).

Conclusion: After a short training, many of these long-standing, moderately active RA patients continued to perform an auto-DAS, though the performance of auto-DAS decreased over time in this cohort where patients did not receive any ongoing positive feedback on their auto-DAS. In the larger inclusions centres, autoDAS adherence was higher, perhaps related to more patient/physician interactions around autoDAS results. Self-assessment of disease activity is feasible in RA but positive reinforcement appears necessary. Further studies should analyse if outcomes are better for patients who self-assess.


Disclosure: L. Gossec, None; F. Foissac, None; M. Soubrier, None; A. Molto, None; F. Fayet, None; T. Bardin, None; F. Berenbaum, None; A. Cantagrel, None; M. H. Cerato, None; G. H. Chales, None; I. Chary-Valckenaere, None; B. Combe, None; E. Dernis Labous, None; L. Euller-Ziegler, None; R. M. Flipo, None; P. Gaudin, None; M. Gilson, None; S. Guis, None; X. Mariette, None; G. Mouterde, None; S. Pouplin, None; P. Richette, None; A. Saraux, None; T. Schaeverbeke, None; J. Sibilia, None; M. Dougados, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gossec L, Foissac F, Soubrier M, Molto A, Fayet F, Bardin T, Berenbaum F, Cantagrel A, Cerato MH, Chales GH, Chary-Valckenaere I, Combe B, Dernis Labous E, Euller-Ziegler L, Flipo RM, Gaudin P, Gilson M, Guis S, Mariette X, Mouterde G, Pouplin S, Richette P, Saraux A, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J, Dougados M. Is the Self-Assessment of Disease Activity (auto-DAS28) By Patients a Feasible and Acceptable Measure over the Long Term in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)? Three-Year Follow-up of a Nurse-Led Program in 771 Patients with Established RA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-the-self-assessment-of-disease-activity-auto-das28-by-patients-a-feasible-and-acceptable-measure-over-the-long-term-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-three-year-follow-up-of-a-nurse-led-program-in-77/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-the-self-assessment-of-disease-activity-auto-das28-by-patients-a-feasible-and-acceptable-measure-over-the-long-term-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-three-year-follow-up-of-a-nurse-led-program-in-77/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology