ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2990

Is Risk of Retinopathy Among Hydroxychloroquine Users of SLE Patients Accurate? a Simulation Study Accounting for Competing Risk of Death

Na Lu1, Hyon K. Choi2, April Jorge3 and Yuqing Zhang4, 1Clinical Epidemiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4School Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: SLE and hydroxychloroquine

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Title: ARHP Epidemiology and Public Health

Session Type: ARHP Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is used for the long-term treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. HCQ is generally well-tolerated with wide-ranging benefits, including reduced disease activity and improved survival; a critical adverse effect is vision-threatening retinopathy. Historically, the risk was considered to be very low. However, a recent retrospective case-control study (N=2,361 taking HCQ for ≥5 years) reported the prevalence estimate of HCQ retinopathy to be 7.5%, which is >3 times higher than that of previous studies (Melles R, et al. JAMA Ophthalmol.; 2017). This study served as the key basis for the 2016 revised American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) recommendations for HCQ retinopathy screening. However, this study did not take into account the competing risk of death (e.g., a 2-fold increased mortality risk in SLE) and thus, the reported retinopathy risk could be overestimated. We conducted a simulation study to estimate potential impact of competing risk of death on risk of retinopathy among patients with SLE.

Methods: In the simulation studies we assumed that (1) the hazard rates of toxic retinopathy for three different doses of HCQ (i.e., >5mg/kg), 4-5mg/kg and <4mg/kg) change over time according to a Weibull distribution; (2) the survival rate in the general population from 55 to 75 years old was based on 2013 Life Table in US; (3) mortality rate in SLE patients is 2-fold higher than that in the general population; and (4) the risk of retinopathy was 70%, 40%, and 15% for 25 years, respectively, based on the previous study. We estimated the risk of retinopathy and depicted survival curves using K-M curve with and without accounting for competing risk of death. We simulated 6000 independent observations based on 1000 replications. 

Results: As shown in Figure 1, the shape and magnitude of risk of retinopathy for each HCQ dose category were similar to the findings of the previous study. After accounting for competing risk of death, the risk of toxic retinopathy was 29.9% (95% CI: 28.8% to 30.1%), 20.4% (95% CI: 19.4% to 21.5%), 10.7% (95% CI: 9.9% to 11.6%), respectively, for each dose over 25 years. The risk of retinopathy from HCQ without accounting for competing risk death may overestimate the true risk of retinopathy for each category of HCQ by 40.2%, 96.0% and 134.1% over 25 years of use, respectively.

Conclusion: Although high dose and long-term HCQ use increase the risk of toxic retinopathy, the reported risk of retinopathy from the recent study without accounting for competing risk of deaths in SLE patients is likely to be overestimated particularly in the long-term follow-up. Prospective studies are needed to accurately estimate the risk of retinopathy attributed to HCQ.               

 


Disclosure: N. Lu, None; H. K. Choi, None; A. Jorge, None; Y. Zhang, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lu N, Choi HK, Jorge A, Zhang Y. Is Risk of Retinopathy Among Hydroxychloroquine Users of SLE Patients Accurate? a Simulation Study Accounting for Competing Risk of Death [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-risk-of-retinopathy-among-hydroxychloroquine-users-of-sle-patients-accurate-a-simulation-study-accounting-for-competing-risk-of-death/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-risk-of-retinopathy-among-hydroxychloroquine-users-of-sle-patients-accurate-a-simulation-study-accounting-for-competing-risk-of-death/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology