ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1438

Is It Necessary to Weight By Weight the Dosage of MTX in RA Patients? Results from Obsevational Analysis of Baseline Data of a Phase III Trial

Alain Saraux1, Christophe Hudry2, Elena Zinovieva3 and Hélène Herman-Demars3, 1Rheumatology Department, Rheumatology Department, CHU de la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France, Brest Cedex, France, 2AP-HP Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France, 3Medical Department Nordic Pharma, Paris, France

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster II: Prognostic Factors, Imaging and Miscellaneous Reports

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In inflammatory rheumatic diseases, pharmacokinetics of MTX may be modified by patients’ weight [1]. The rheumatologists are though reluctant to prescribe a high dosage to patients with a low weight. On the other hand, international guidelines (ACR and EULAR [2, 3]) do not recommend any weight adaptation concerning MTX dose. Following which, rheumatologists generally do not increase MTX dosage above 25 mg/wk for patients with high weight. Our goal was to evaluate the MTX dosage used in routine practice to treat RA as compared the patients’ weight.

Methods: We used the baseline data of SELFi study. This phase III trial included patients treated by MTX (≥ 3 months, oral or SC) randomized in two arms: MTX in prefilled syringes or MTX autoinjector. The primary objective of the study was to compare the arms in terms of HAQ and treatment adhesion at 6 months. In this preliminary post-hoc analysis, we evaluated in four groups <50kg, 50-74,9 kg, 75-99,9 kg, and >100 kg the mean dosage of MTX in mg/kg, the proportion of patient receiving <10, 10 to 14.9, 15 to 19.9, ≥ 20 mg/wk, and the proportion of patients receiving < or ≥ 0.3 mg/kg/wk. We also evaluated the factors associated to the use of ≥ 0.3 mg/kg/wk using univariate or multivariate analyses.

Results: Between Sept 2015 and Sept 2016 SELFi study recruited 264 patients (192 women and 72 men); mean age: 58.4±13.2 years. Mean weight of women/men was 67.3±13.5 kg and 81.5±13.7 kg respectively (p<0.0001). The difference of BMI between men and women was statistically significant: 25.8±5.3 for women and 26,9±3.9 for men (p=0.014). Absolute value of MTX dosage was the same for both genders: 15.4 mg/wk in women vs 15.9 in men (p=0.36). Although, the proportion of women and men receiving ≥ 15mg/wk dosage is not statistically different (75.5% vs 84.7%, p=0.11), 17.7% of women vs only 2.9% of men received ≥0.3 mg/kg/wk (p=0.002). While the patients <50kg receive 0.29 mg/kg/wk for the other groups this parameter is decreased to 0.24, 0.19 et 0.16 mg/kg/wk for the tree other groups. Results of the univariate analysis show that the prescription of MTX ≥ 0.3 mg/kg/wk is associated with the female gender (p<0.002), the height (p<0.001) and the weight (p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, only the weight remains associated (p<0.0001). However, the MTX dosage <0.3 mg/kg/wk was not associated with higher disease activity, but the study was designed to consider patients with low disease activity.

Conclusion: Weight does not seem to influence the MTX dosage in RA patients. Although the dosage of MTX in mg/wk seems slightly higher in men vs women, it is significantly lower in mg/kg/wk. These results raise the question of the utilization of mg/kg/wk MTX dosage rather than the absolute value in mg/wk. On this basis, it would be interesting to design a randomized controlled trial to further explore these findings.

References: 1 – Berthelot et al Rev Rhum, 2002, 69 : 72-83; 2 – Singh et al Arthritis Care Res 2016;68:1-25; 3 – Smolen et al doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715


Disclosure: A. Saraux, Nordic Pharma, 5; C. Hudry, Nordic Pharma, 5; E. Zinovieva, Nordic Pharma, 3; H. Herman-Demars, Nordic Pharma, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Saraux A, Hudry C, Zinovieva E, Herman-Demars H. Is It Necessary to Weight By Weight the Dosage of MTX in RA Patients? Results from Obsevational Analysis of Baseline Data of a Phase III Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-it-necessary-to-weight-by-weight-the-dosage-of-mtx-in-ra-patients-results-from-obsevational-analysis-of-baseline-data-of-a-phase-iii-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-it-necessary-to-weight-by-weight-the-dosage-of-mtx-in-ra-patients-results-from-obsevational-analysis-of-baseline-data-of-a-phase-iii-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology