ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2782

Is It Necessary to Hold Anticoagulation Prior to Temporal Artery Biopsy?

Mahjabeen Haq1, Danielle Schwartz1, Monica Weinberg1, Jillian Cepeda1, Erin Taub2, Asha Patniak3 and Qingping Yao4, 1Department of Medicine-Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology Division, Stony Brook University Hospital, stony brook, NY, 2Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, stony brook, NY, 3Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, 4Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Anticoagulation, biopsies, giant cell arteritis and temporal arteritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Vasculitis Poster III: Immunosuppressive Therapy in Giant Cell Arteritis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Temporal arteritis (TA) is characterized by chronic granulomatous inflammation in medium and large-sized vessels.  It affects 20 in 100,000 people aged 50 and older in the United States. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is a common diagnostic tool. Patients are often on anticoagulation (AC) therapy for other comorbidities.  In current clinical practice, there are no guidelines on AC use perioperatively for TAB.  Our study aimed at examining whether AC therapy was held prior to TAB as well as potential complications post-biopsy in our hospital.  

Methods: The study is a retrospective chart review and was approved by the Stony Brook University Institutional Review Board. Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) were searched using ICD 9 and 10 codes for GCA among hospitalized patients between January 2013 and December 2016. Relevant data was collected, including demographics, AC usage and potential TAB related complications, such as ecchymosis, hematoma, infection, wound dehiscence, and facial nerve injury. TAB was performed by General or Vascular Surgeons in our hospital and documented by standard procedure in the EMRs. In most cases, ultrasound was used to map out temporal artery, lidocaine was administered locally, and a segment of temporal artery was obtained. Descriptive statistics and chi-square/fisher exact tests were used for the data analysis.

Results: Forty-six patients were included in this study due to high clinical suspicion for GCA. The mean age of the patients was 72.8 years, females accounted for 67.4% of patients, and 76.7% were Caucasian. Twenty-seven of 46 patients underwent TAB, of whom 20 patients were on AC therapy prior to procedure. All but one patient continued AC prior to TAB. Of the 20 patients with TAB, surgical data was available in 16 patients. Thirteen patients did not experience complications and only 3 patients reported incision site pain, minor bleeding, or small ecchymosis. There was no significant difference in TAB-associated complications between the two groups. Aspirin dosing was 81 mg, except one patient on 325 mg, and clopidogrel dosing was 75 mg daily. Perioperative use of AC medications and TAB-associated complications are shown in Table 1 and 2.

Conclusion: This study indicates that patients who continued AC prior to TAB developed minimal TAB-associated complications. Our data seems to support the view that there may be inadequate evidence to recommend holding anticoagulation prior to TAB. A prospective study of a large sample size is needed to confirm the results.

 

Table 1: Perioperative Use of Anticoagulation Medications

N=41

TAB completed

 

 

No (N=17)

Yes (N=24)

P-value

Ac prior to Biopsy (5 missing)

 

 

 

No

7 (41.18)

4 (16.67)

0.1509

Yes

10 (58.82)

20 (83.33)

Was AC held

 

 

No, continued

10 (100.0)

19 (95.00)

1.0000

Yes, Held

0 (0.0)

1 (5.00)

AC started after TAB (5 missing)

 

 

No

7 (41.18)

5 (20.83)

0.1838

Yes

10 (58.82)

19 (79.17)

   

Table 2: Anticoagulation Medications and TAB Complications
N=16 TAB complications  
  No (N=13) Yes (N=3) P-Value

AC medication type

     

ASA

8 (61.54) 2 (66.7) 0.3582

Plavix

2 (15.38) 0 (0.0)

ASA & Plavix

1 (7.69) 0 (0.0)

Warfarin

1 (7.69) 0 (0.0)

Rivaroxaban

1 (7.69) 0 (0.0)

ASA & Warfarin

0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

Apixaban

0 (0.0) 1 (3.3)

AC Medication Use

     

Yes

13 (81.25) 3 (100.0) 1.0000

No

3 (18.75) 0 (0.0)

 


Disclosure: M. Haq, None; D. Schwartz, None; M. Weinberg, None; J. Cepeda, None; E. Taub, None; A. Patniak, None; Q. Yao, Novartis, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Haq M, Schwartz D, Weinberg M, Cepeda J, Taub E, Patniak A, Yao Q. Is It Necessary to Hold Anticoagulation Prior to Temporal Artery Biopsy? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-it-necessary-to-hold-anticoagulation-prior-to-temporal-artery-biopsy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-it-necessary-to-hold-anticoagulation-prior-to-temporal-artery-biopsy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology