ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1563

Is Automated DATA Capture As Reliable As Manual DATA Entry in Survey Based Research?

Rachel A. Mikolaitis1, Jessica Cornejo2, Chris Alonzo1, Joel A. Block1 and Meenakshi Jolly2, 1Section of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 2Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Questionnaires

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Clinical Practice/Patient Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: The collection of patient reported outcomes requires accruing survey data from patients during routine medical visits. Many of these are paper-based and require manual data-entry for adequate analysis.  However, entering surveys by hand is tedious, time consuming, and may result in entry-errors. Teleform data capture technology automates paper-based processes especially in high volume settings, decreases processing time and cuts personnel and material costs, but the accuracy of automated data capture has not been well documented in clinical settings. AIMS:To test the reliability of teleform captured data against traditional hand entered patient health outcomes data.

Methods: As a quality improvement initiative, we populated survey data from 50 patients using both methods in parallel. The survey had 43 multiple choice questions on health outcomes using a Likert scale. This scale was entered into the teleform program for each question.  We programmed the teleform to ensure that each question had a response, and to alert the user for each missing response.   We calculated internal consistency reliability by Cronbach alpha using a two-way random method to test for absolute agreement in item responses using the two methods. This analysis was repeated for each of the 43 items.

Results: The Internal consistency reliability estimates for 43 items ranged from 0.98 to 1.0. In the 7% of the items where the responses were not in 100% agreement, the discrepancy occurred by misclassification of the Likert category response by one point (0 and 1) in three different questions and subjects. This occurred due to human error in data entry by hand, or the scanner recognizing a small mark in the “0” response boxes.

Conclusion: Teleforms data-capturing for data entry is reliable and feasible for patient driven research in Rheumatology.  This program has good reliability concerning correct data entry and is a faster way for data managers to capture large amounts of data in a shorter period.


Disclosure:

R. A. Mikolaitis,
None;

J. Cornejo,
None;

C. Alonzo,
None;

J. A. Block,
None;

M. Jolly,

GlaxoSmithKline,

5,

MedImmune,

7,

The Binding Site,

2,

Lupus Foundation of America,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-automated-data-capture-as-reliable-as-manual-data-entry-in-survey-based-research/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology