ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1158

Investigating Health Literacy and Numeracy in an Academic Center Lupus Cohort

Mithu Maheswaranathan1, Raeann Whitney 2, Megan Clowse 2, Amanda Eudy 2 and Jennifer Rogers 2, 1Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 2Duke University, Durham

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: health disparities and patient questionnaires, Health literacy, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Healthcare Disparities In Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Up to 50% of American adults have basic or below basic health literacy and numeracy.  Low health literacy is associated with increased health care costs and hospitalization rates as well as poor disease knowledge and self-management.  Health numeracy is a form of quantitative health literacy with important implications on health.  While studies have demonstrated the impact of low health literacy on patient outcomes in many diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, there is no recently published data investigating literacy and numeracy in SLE.  The objectives of this study were to (1) assess baseline health literacy and numeracy of our SLE cohort and (2) evaluate clinical associations.

Methods: SLE patients in a university clinic meeting SLICC criteria from March through May 2019 were recruited.  Health literacy was assessed using the Basic Health Literacy Screen (BHLS), Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) and the Arthritis-Adapted REALM (A-REALM).  Health numeracy was evaluated using the Shortened Subjective Numeracy Scale (SNS-3) and the Numeracy Understanding in Medicine Instrument Shortened Version (S-NUMi).  Fisher’s exact test was applied to categorical variables using STATA Version 15.  The associations between health literacy and numeracy with clinical variables were analyzed using univariate and multivariate models.

Results: The study included 35 patients with SLE with an average age of 39 years, 94% were high school graduates and 49% college graduates, 69% had annual income < $50,000, and 71% were non-white.  SLE disease duration averaged 14 years and current average clinical SLEDAI was 2.1.  The majority of patients scored in the high school range for literacy (86% with REALM ≥ 61) and self-reported good reading skills (BHLS mean 13.2 [SD 2.5] out of 15).  On the other hand, only 23% of patients scored in the high range for numeracy, and patients reported lower subjective math self-evaluation scores (SNS-3 12.5 [SD 4.3] out of 18).

Compared to patients with high numeracy, patients with a s-NUMI score consistent with average or low numeracy were more likely to be black, have significantly lower income or have Medicaid insurance (Table 1).  There was not an association between numeracy and prior lupus nephritis, current lupus activity, self-reported medication adherence, or current pain, fatigue or depression; however, the study was under-powered to identify these differences.  Interestingly, self-reported cognitive dysfunction was not different between groups.

Conclusion: In our study, the majority of SLE patients scored at the high school range for health literacy (86%) compared to only 23% demonstrating high numeracy scores.  Our clinical experience suggests that patient understanding of lupus manifestations and treatment is not reflected in the high literacy scores found in this study.  We hypothesize that a patient’s ability to read words, as is tested in the REALM and A-REALM, is not sufficient to assess understanding of the complexity of SLE.  Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of literacy and numeracy on disease understanding and medication adherence.


Table 1

Association Between Numeracy Scores and Patient Characteristics / Clinical Measures


Figure 1

Figure 1: Distribution of the Objective Literacy -REALM- and Numeracy -S-NUMi- Scores


Disclosure: M. Maheswaranathan, None; R. Whitney, None; M. Clowse, GSK, 2, UCB, 5; A. Eudy, GSK, 2; J. Rogers, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maheswaranathan M, Whitney R, Clowse M, Eudy A, Rogers J. Investigating Health Literacy and Numeracy in an Academic Center Lupus Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/investigating-health-literacy-and-numeracy-in-an-academic-center-lupus-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/investigating-health-literacy-and-numeracy-in-an-academic-center-lupus-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology