ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1563

Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Who Should We Screen?

Muhsen Al-ani1, Bobby Kwanghoon Han 2 and Gregory c Gardner 3, 1University of Washington, seattle, WA, 2University of Washington, seattle, 3University of Wasshington, seattle

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: interstitial lung disease, Pulmonary Involvement and antibodies, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: SLE – Clinical Poster II: Comorbidities

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a disease with a variety of  clinical manifestations but interestingly interstitial lung disease (ILD) is rare. The literature to date has not identified consistent markers to help with clinical decision making regarding screening for SLE-ILD.  Some of these features may depend on specific ethnic variation based on the population studied.  We retrospectively identified patients with SLE and ILD at our institution over a twenty-year period to try to identify an SLE-ILD phenotype in our Northwest US SLE population to aid in decisions about screening.

Methods: We conducted a review of our electronic record database at University of Washington Medical center, looking for patients with the diagnosis of SLE who were seen between 1998-2018 in our Rheumatology outpatient clinics.  We identified 1335 SLE patients by using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 and 10 codes.  We also identified 29 patients with a diagnosis of SLE-ILD.   Diagnosis was confirmed by individual medical record review by a rheumatologist based on history, exam, laboratory, and imaging findings.  Clinical and serologic data for each patient was recorded and analyzed and compared to a control group of SLE patient without ILD.

Results: SLE-ILD was found in only 2% of our SLE population.  SLE-ILD appears to be more common in Asians (31 vs 14% SLE-ILD vs control population).   More than half of the patients who will develop SLE-ILD, will develop it in first 2 years after SLE diagnosis. NSIP is the most common type of SLE-ILD (72.2%) followed by UIP (24%). Common clinical features include the presence of Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) and gastrointestinal esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and both were present in greater than 70% of SLE-ILD patients.  Of note, 34% of our SLE-ILD patients had co-existing pulmonary hypertension.  Chest x-ray missed ILD changes in almost 30% and required CT scan to make the diagnosis. Common serologic findings included speckled ANA (66%), anti-SM, RNP or SM/RNP antibodies (59%). Seventy-four percent of patients responded (stable or improved) to therapy (most common therapy was MMF).  Forced vital capacity measurement (FVC) changed at an average rate of only 1.65 %/year in this population.  Those with a UIP pattern on CT tended to do worse (43% worse UIP vs 19% NSIP).  Only one death occurred in this population over the study period of unknown cause.

Conclusion: Our retrospective study showed that ILD is a rare manifestation of SLE. Patients with the combination of RP, GERD, and either anti-SM, RNP, or SM/RNP antibodies should be considered high risk for developing SLE-ILD and intermittent screening with pulmonary function tests that include FVC and DLCO measurements.  Given that 41% of our patients also had pulmonary hypertension ECHO should also be considered in patients with SLE-ILD especially those with relatively low DLCO. Screening should be considered early in the disease process in patients with this phenotype and Asian patients especially should be watched closely.


Disclosure: M. Al-ani, None; B. Han, None; G. Gardner, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Al-ani M, Han B, Gardner G. Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Who Should We Screen? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/interstitial-lung-disease-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-who-should-we-screen/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/interstitial-lung-disease-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-who-should-we-screen/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology