ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1909

Interpretation Of Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) By Rheumatologists

Vivek Nagaraja1, David A. Fox2, Sheeja Francis1, Ora Singer1, Puja Khanna1, Timothy Laing1, Rory Marks1, Seetha U. Monrad1, Vladimir M. Ognenovski1, Kristine Phillips3 and Dinesh Khanna1, 1Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, 2Rheumatology/Int Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, 3Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: PROMIS and rheumatology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Innovations in Health Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The National Institutes of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS¨) roadmap initiative is a cooperative research program designed to develop, evaluate, and standardize item banks to measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) across different medical conditions as well as the US population (www.nihpromis.org). It has comprehensive items banks that assess physical, mental, and social well-being. The aim of this study was to assess the interpretation of PROMIS report by rheumatologists at the University of Michigan (UM) Hospital.

Methods: Four focus group discussions consisting of eleven rheumatologists were held at UM Health System. The panelists were first presented with an overview of PROMIS process followed by a series of patient reports With a focus on the evaluating which report was feasible to use in day-to-day practice and clinically meaningful, the following questions were asked by: (i) What do you think of this report? (ii) Do you understand what this report is communicating? (iii) Is there anything you would change about this report to make this better?

Results: All the rheumatologists agreed on the following suggestions: (i) Representation of the item scores as thermal graphs or “heat map” was easier to interpret (ii) Provide average scores for the U.S. population and rheumatology patients, (iii) Provide both average and percentile scores, and (iv) Provide pictorial depiction of most bothersome symptom and urgency for referral. Based on these discussions, we modified the PROMIS heat map (Figure 1) to include: (i) average scores for rheumatologic disorders (bold square), (ii), an open diamond to indicate the individual scores of the patients, and (iii) thickness of the diamond indicates the severity of these symptoms in the patient with an urgency for intervention (thicker equates to greater urgency).

Conclusion: This presents the first step to assess feasibility of incorporating PRO in rheumatology practice at UM. The PROMIS report card when integrated with the electronic medical record can contribute towards meaningful use. It may improve patient satisfaction and physician-patient relationship. Our long-term goal is to integrate PROMIS into a busy academic practice and assess its effectiveness.

Figure 1: Format of PROMIS report after incorporating the suggestions


Disclosure:

V. Nagaraja,
None;

D. A. Fox,
None;

S. Francis,
None;

O. Singer,
None;

P. Khanna,
None;

T. Laing,
None;

R. Marks,
None;

S. U. Monrad,
None;

V. M. Ognenovski,
None;

K. Phillips,
None;

D. Khanna,

NIH/NIAMS FUNDING,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/interpretation-of-patient-reported-outcomes-measurement-information-system-promis-by-rheumatologists/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology