ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1952

Interest in Clinical Trial Participation Among People with Lupus: Results from the Research Accelerated by You (RAY) Registry

Michael Fisher1, Mimi Kim2, Joan Merrill3, Safoah Agyemang1 and Joy Buie1, 1Lupus Foundation of America, Washington, DC, 2Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 3Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City 73104, OK

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: clinical trial, registry, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Health Services Research – ACR/ARP Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: With many treatments under study for SLE, a crisis in recruiting sufficient numbers of qualified patients for clinical trials has emerged. Willingness to consider trial participation may be influenced by many factors. The aim of this study was to analyze factors affecting interest in clinical trial participation using the Lupus Foundation of America’s Research Accelerated by You (RAY) registry.

Methods: RAY was created to improve understanding of lupus patient perspectives and connect patients with trial opportunities. Over 3,000 registrants have reported on lupus diagnosis, symptoms, treatments, and impacts. This analysis assessed factors associated with interest in trial participation in those with no prior trial participation. Demographics (age, time since diagnosis, education, gender, income, insurance, race and ethnicity) were compared between patients with and without interest in trial participation using T-test and chi-square analyses. Multinomial regression models reported as relative risk ratios (RRR) were fit to assess any independent contributions of demographic factors to a three-category dependent variable: interest in trial participation, no interest due to side effect concerns, and no interest due to other reasons.

Results: Of the 1,911 RAY registrants with no prior clinical trial participation, those reporting no interest in trial participation (12.5%) were older (46.9 vs. 44.5 years, p = .022) and had longer time since diagnosis (11.3 vs. 9.6 years; p = .018) compared to those expressing interest in trials (Table 1). The proportion of older individuals (50+ years) was higher in those who were clinical trial averse due to side effect concerns (49.0%) or concerns about treatment declines/delays (53.8%) than those interested in trials (36.9%), not interested due to practical barriers (38.5%), and not interested for other reasons (41.9%; p = 0.017; Table 2). In younger patients, no reason for reticence about trial participation predominated, but a range of concerns were reported. The proportion of people with 6+ years since diagnosis was higher in trial averse patients with concerns about treatment declines/delays (80.8%) compared to other groups (51.6 – 61.3%; p < 0.001; Table 3). Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that age 50+ years was independently associated with a 1.64-fold increase in the risk ratio of no trial interest due to side effect concerns vs. trial interest (RRR = 1.64 compared to age < 50 years; 95% CI: 1.09-2.46; p = 0.017). Time since diagnosis 6+ years was independently associated with a 1.86-fold increase in the risk ratio of no trial interest for other reasons vs. trial interest (RRR = 1.86 compared to time since diagnosis < 6 years; 95% CI: 1.27-2.71; p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Although clinical trial participation interest is high (88.6%) in RAY, addressing patient reservations about trial participation might improve enrollment at a time of plentiful trials and insufficient numbers of participants. Key issues reported by lupus patients, especially those over 50, are the potential for side effects and treatment declines/delays. However, other issues are also reported, and recruitment of younger patients might be impacted by addressing these impediments.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Characteristics of US RAY Registrants Never in Clinical Trials, by Clinical Trial Interest

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Reasons for Lack of Clinical Trial Interest by Age

Supporting image 3

Table 3. Reasons for Lack of Clinical Trial Interest by Time Since Diagnosis


Disclosures: M. Fisher: None; M. Kim: None; J. Merrill: AbbVie, 1, 2, Alexion, 1, 2, Alumis, 1, 2, Amgen, 1, 2, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 5, Aurinia, 1, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, 2, 5, EMD Serono, 1, 2, Genentech, 1, 2, Gilead, 1, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 2, 5, Kezar, 1, 2, Lilly, 1, 2, Merck, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, Provention, 1, 2, Remegen, 1, 2, Sanofi, 1, 2, Takeda, 1, 2, UCB, 1, 2, Zenas, 1, 2; S. Agyemang: None; J. Buie: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fisher M, Kim M, Merrill J, Agyemang S, Buie J. Interest in Clinical Trial Participation Among People with Lupus: Results from the Research Accelerated by You (RAY) Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/interest-in-clinical-trial-participation-among-people-with-lupus-results-from-the-research-accelerated-by-you-ray-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/interest-in-clinical-trial-participation-among-people-with-lupus-results-from-the-research-accelerated-by-you-ray-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology