ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2386

Integrating Wearable Physical Activity Monitoring Tools into Rehabilitation Practice for Patients with Arthritis: The Healthcare Professional Perspective

Graham Macdonald1, Jenny Leese2, Catherine Backman3, Aileen Davis4, Anne F. Townsend5, J Antonio Avina-Zubieta6, Diane Gromala7 and Linda Li5, 1Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Occup Science & OccupTherapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Health Care and Outcomes Rsrch, Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada, 6Medicine, University of British Columbia, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: arthritis management, exercise, occupational therapy and physical therapy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation Poster (ARHP): Rehabilitation Sciences

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Wearable physical activity monitoring tools can be used for goal-setting and progress-monitoring in rehabilitation programs for patients with arthritis. Little is known about the views of health professionals regarding the use or potential of these tools in clinical application. As part of a larger project about the barriers and facilitators to using physical activity trackers in clinical practice, this qualitative study aimed to examine the perspective of healthcare professionals on the prospect of using commercially available wearable trackers in their practice. 

Methods: We conducted focus groups and one-on-one interviews to explore the views of health professionals towards physical activity trackers. Eligible participants were physiotherapists or occupational therapists with at least 40% of their caseload dedicated to arthritis. English-speaking therapists with any level of experience with online tools were considered eligible. Transcripts of the interviews and focus groups were coded and analyzed in a qualitative, theme-based examination of the views that healthcare professionals held toward these devices.

Results:

Across 5 focus groups and 3 interviews conducted in 2014-15, the sample of 25 health professionals recruited were mainly female (92%). Of the 18 participants who provided more demographic information, 94% were physiotherapists, 94% were living and working in an urban or suburban environment, with 60% of participants working full-time, and 67% working in outpatient clinics. The participant age range was between 28 and 61, with the median age of participants being 47, and the range of years in practice was between 5 and 39, with a median of 22 years. Approximately one third of participants had experience in using physical activity trackers. 

The majority of healthcare professionals participating in the study regarded these devices as potentially useful tools because of the objective data they provide and their ability to facilitate the setting of and adherence to goals throughout rehabilitation. Some of the participants, however, thought that they would be of limited use due to: 1) the lesser computer literacy of older patients, who were the majority of patients with osteoarthritis; 2) their potential to be just another novelty; 3) the inaccessibility for people with health-related challenges such as hand pain and deformity due to arthritis, or vision problems; 4) the cost of these devices for patients. 

Conclusion: Therapists report activity trackers show promise for improving physical activity habits, however, some therapists are skeptical regarding the benefit for and accessibility to specific patients, particularly older adults with osteoarthritis.


Disclosure: G. Macdonald, None; J. Leese, None; C. Backman, None; A. Davis, None; A. F. Townsend, None; J. A. Avina-Zubieta, None; D. Gromala, None; L. Li, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Macdonald G, Leese J, Backman C, Davis A, Townsend AF, Avina-Zubieta JA, Gromala D, Li L. Integrating Wearable Physical Activity Monitoring Tools into Rehabilitation Practice for Patients with Arthritis: The Healthcare Professional Perspective [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/integrating-wearable-physical-activity-monitoring-tools-into-rehabilitation-practice-for-patients-with-arthritis-the-healthcare-professional-perspective/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/integrating-wearable-physical-activity-monitoring-tools-into-rehabilitation-practice-for-patients-with-arthritis-the-healthcare-professional-perspective/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology