ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1022

Initiation Of Biologic Therapy: The Patient Perspective

Amir Goren1, Susan C. Bolge2, Duncan Brown3, Roxanne Meyer4 and Seth Ginsberg5, 1Kantar Health, New York, NY, 2Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, 3Kantar Health, New york, NY, 4Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, NY, 5Creaky Joints, New York, NY

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, patient and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services II & III

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Current guidelines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend that patients who are not adequately responding to treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), most often methotrexate, initiate treatment with biologic therapy.  However, from the patient perspective, there may be many other factors which influence this decision.  This study describes the experience of patients who are considering biologic therapy to manage their RA.

Methods: :  Study patients were recruited through two sources: the patient advocacy organization, CreakyJoints, and the Lightspeed Research consumer panel.  Patients were U.S. adults (aged ≥18), diagnosed with RA, and currently treated by a rheumatologist with DMARDs.  Patients had no history of biologic use but had discussed biologic therapy with their physician.  Data were collected directly from patients through a self-administered, web-based questionnaire. 

Results: Among the 243 patients who completed the study, the mean (SD) time that elapsed since discussions about biologic therapy began was 1.3 (1.8) years over a mean (SD) of 2.7 (2.6) office visits.  Rheumatologists were most likely to initiate the discussion (54%), but 23% of patients reported initiating it.  A majority of patients (>73%) reported discussing the following aspects of biologic therapy  either somewhat or in detail: ability to improve well-being or daily functioning; ability to improve mobility or range of motion; ability to slow or stop joint damage; potential side effects; how treatment is taken/administered; and frequency of administration.  However, fewer than 39% of patients reported discussing the subcutaneous injection experience, the intravenous infusion experience, or financial and treatment support programs.  Most patients believe they are the primary decision maker: 25% make the final decision about treatment and 49% make the final decision after considering their rheumatologist’s recommendation.  When making treatment decisions, 74% of patients reported that they consider both their current and future situations, though 15% only consider the present and 10% only consider the future.

Conclusion: Patients with RA are active participants in the process of initiating biologic therapy.  Rheumatologists should actively engage their patients in the shared-decision making process for initiating biologic therapy.  As demonstrated by previous research, effective communication between patients and providers may have a positive impact on patient satisfaction and adherence to therapy.


Disclosure:

A. Goren,

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC,

5;

S. C. Bolge,

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC,

3;

D. Brown,

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC,

5;

R. Meyer,

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC,

3;

S. Ginsberg,

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/initiation-of-biologic-therapy-the-patient-perspective/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology