ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1693

Initial Triple DMARD Therapy Is More Efficient Than Methotrexate Monotherapy In Recent Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis; 1-Year Data Of a Randomized Clinical Trial (tREACH)

P.H.P. de Jong1, J.M.W. Hazes2, K.H. Han3, A.M. Huisman4, D. van Zeben5, P.A. van der Lubbe6, A.H. Gerards6, B. van Schaeybroeck7, P.B. de Sonnaville8, M.V. Krugten9, J.J. Luime2 and A.E.A.M. Weel3, 1Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 4Rheumatology, Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 5Department of Rheumatology, Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 6Department of Rheumatology, Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands, 7Rheumatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 8Department of Rheumatology, Admiraal de Ruyter hospital, Goes, Netherlands, 9Department of Rheumatology, Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital, Vlissingen, Netherlands

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs, Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, glucocorticoids, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment options

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: ACR Plenary Session II: Discovery 2013

Session Type: Plenary Sessions

Background/Purpose: Recommended treatment for DMARD naïve patients is methotrexate (MTX) with or without glucocorticoids (GCs). Triple DMARD therapy however is not recommended, because well proven evidence of superior efficacy is suggested to be lacking. Furthermore possible drug toxicities might influence the physician’s choice of induction therapy. Therefore, our aim is to compare one-year clinical efficacy of: (1) triple DMARD therapy vs. MTX mono-therapy and (2) oral GCs bridging therapy vs. 1 dose of intramuscular (im) GCs in patients with early RA. 
Methods: The one-year data of single-blinded randomized clinical trial in patients with recent-onset arthritis (tREACH) were used. Patients were included who had a high probability (> 70%) of progressing to persistent arthritis, based on the prediction model of Visser. The Visser algorithm and 2010 criteria for RA have similar discriminative abilities to identify patients at risk of persistent arthritis at 1 year. Patients were randomized into 3 induction therapy strategies: (A) triple DMARD therapy (MTX 25 mg + sulfasalazine (SASP) 2 gr. +
hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)) 400 mg with im GCs (Depomedrol 120mg), (B) triple DMARD therapy with an oral GCs tapering scheme (starting 15 mg) and (C) MTX with oral GCs similar to B. Treatment strategies were ‘tightly controlled’, with patients being examined every 3 months and treatment decisions based upon the original DAS thresholds for low disease activity. We investigated following response parameters over time: DAS, HAQ, using the area under the curve (AUC). We also looked at radiographic progression after 12 months of therapy, medication usage and adverse events.

Results: A total of 281 patients were included in the high probability stratum and randomly assigned to (A) (n=91), (B) (n=93) or (C) (n=97).  Patients were mostly females (68%) with an average symptom duration of 166 days (95% CI: 156 – 177). At baseline 267 (95%) of patients fulfilled the 2010 criteria for RA,  216 (77%) patients were ACPA positive and 48 (16%) patients had erosions. Over time disease activity and functional ability were respectively  -2·39 (-4·77 to -0·00, 95%CI) and -1·67 (-3·35 to 0·02, 95%CI)  lower in patients with triple DMARD therapy compared with MTX mono-therapy. After 3 months, less treatment failure occurred in the triple DMARD therapy groups, resulting in the prescription of 50% fewer biologicals. This difference remained over time. No differences were seen between both GC bridging therapies. Respectively 15%, 30%, and 18% of patients in arm A, B, and C had radiographic progression after 1 year. No differences in serious adverse events were seen.

Conclusion: In patients with early RA triple DMARD therapy is superior to MTX mono-therapy even after 12 months of therapy. Furthermore both intramuscular and oral GCs can be used as bridging therapy.


Disclosure:

P. H. P. de Jong,
None;

J. M. W. Hazes,
None;

K. H. Han,
None;

A. M. Huisman,
None;

D. van Zeben,
None;

P. A. van der Lubbe,
None;

A. H. Gerards,
None;

B. van Schaeybroeck,
None;

P. B. de Sonnaville,
None;

M. V. Krugten,
None;

J. J. Luime,
None;

A. E. A. M. Weel,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/initial-triple-dmard-therapy-is-more-efficient-than-methotrexate-monotherapy-in-recent-onset-rheumatoid-arthritis-1-year-data-of-a-randomized-clinical-trial-treach/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology