Session Information
Session Type: ACR Poster Session B
Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM
Background/Purpose: Classically, it has been thought that sun exposure is a risk factor for developing cutaneous manifestations in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. On the other hand, in experimental studies UV radiation has a number of immunomodulatory effects and stimulates vitamin D synthesis. Our objective was to examine the mucocutaneous manifestations of SLE patients from the GLADEL cohort in relation to solar radiation of the place where they lived along Latin America by performing an ecological study.
Methods: GLADEL patients were categorized according to solar radiation (insolation on horizontal surface) of the Rheumatology Center where they were recruited, ascertained between the period of cohort follow up (1995-2004); this was obtained using NASA Surface meteorology and Solar Energy estimator (https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/sse/[email protected]). Alopecia, photosensitivity, malar rash, discoid lesions, oral ulcers and subacute cutaneous lupus at cohort entry and during follow up were examined in multivariate models in relation to the average daily solar radiation of the city of residence (as a continuous variable) and other possible confounders.
Results: GLADEL cohort included 1480 lupus patients, with a disease duration < 2 years at entry, 89.9 % female (CI 88-91), mean age 29.5 years (SD 12.3), median follow up 52 months (IQR 24-70), from 34 centers of 22 cities of 9 countries in Latin America. Latitudes of these centers varied between -38° S (Mar del Plata, Argentina) and 25.7° N (Monterrey, Mexico) and mean daily solar radiation varied between 4.44 Kwh/m2/day (Porto Alegre, Brazil) and 6.08 Kwh/m2/day (Recife, Brazil) (Table 1). When entering the cohort, 1191 patients (80.47 %) had one or more of the cutaneous manifestations mentioned above and 434 patients (29.31%) developed new skin involvement during follow up. In logistic regression analysis after adjusting for age, gender, ethnic group, urban residence, latitude, antimalarial use and antibodies (anti DNA, anti Sm, anti Ro, antiphospholipid, low C3), living in a city with higher daily solar radiation (examined at 1 Kwh/m²/day increments) was not associated to any of the cutaneous manifestations at disease onset or during follow up (Table 2).
Conclusion: In the GLADEL cohort, the average solar radiation of the city of residence was not associated with an increased risk of developing cutaneous manifestations. Table 1. Latitude and solar radiation of GLADEL patients’ cities of residence.
City | Latitude | Mean daily solar radiation (1995-2004) (Kwh/m2/day) | Lupus patients in GLADEL, N (% ) |
Monterrey, Mexico |
25.68 N |
5.28 |
32 (2.2) |
La Habana, Cuba |
23.13 N |
5.80 |
27 (1.8) |
Aguas Calientes, Mexico |
21.88 N |
6.00 |
20 (1.3) |
Guadalajara, Mexico |
20.67 N |
5.88 |
55 (3.7) |
Mexico DF, Mexico |
19.43 N |
5.59 |
184 (12.4) |
Guatemala, Guatemala |
14.64 N |
5.32 |
29 (1.9) |
Caracas, Venezuela |
10.49 N |
5.64 |
72 (4.9) |
San Cristobal, Venezuela |
7.77 N |
4.93 |
22 (1.5) |
Medellin, Colombia |
6.25 N |
4.53 |
98 (6.6) |
Bogota, Colombia |
4.61 N |
4.81 |
80 (5.4) |
Recife, Brazil |
-8.05 S |
6.08 |
20 (1.3) |
Lima, Peru |
-12.05 S |
5.53 |
100 (6.8) |
Goiana, Brazil |
-16.64 S |
5.46 |
55 (3.7) |
Campinas, Brazil |
-22.90 S |
5.11 |
40 (2.7) |
Sao Pablo, Brazil |
-23.63 S |
4.67 |
102 (6.9) |
Porto Alegre, Brazil |
-30.03 S |
4.44 |
32 (2.2) |
Cordoba, Argentina |
-31.40 S |
5.16 |
92 (6.2) |
Rosario, Argentina |
-32.95 S |
4.82 |
119 (8.0) |
Santiago, Chile |
-33.46 S |
5.53 |
117 (7.9) |
Buenos Aires, Argentina |
-34.60 S |
4.69 |
92 (6.2) |
La Plata, Argentina |
-34.92 S |
4.67 |
44 (2.9) |
Mar del Plata, Argentina |
-38.00 S |
4.50 |
48 (3.2) |
Table 2. Associations of average daily solar radiation of city of residence (examined at increments of 1 Kwh/m2/day) by multivariable logistic regression analysis
Clinical manifestation |
OR (manifestation before/at cohort inclusion) |
OR (new manifestation) |
OR (manifestation during follow up) |
Alopecia |
0.79 (0.61-1.02) |
1.35 (0.92-1.98) |
1.08 (0.83-1.42) |
Oral/nasal ulcers |
0.81 (0.62-1.04) |
1.05 (0.66-1.69) |
0.74 (0.53-1.03) |
Photosensitivity |
0.79 (0.62-1.03) |
0.63 (0.39-1.04) |
0.81 (0.60-1.09) |
Subacute cutaneous lupus |
1.21 (0.57-2.54) |
0.81 (0.31-2.13) |
0.7 (0.30- 1.62) |
Malar rash |
0.92 (0.71-1.18) |
1.41 (0.91-2.16) |
1.17 (0.89-1.52) |
Discoid lesions |
1.24 (0.82-1.88) |
1.83 (0.81-4.11) |
1.29 (0.77-2.18) |
Any of the previous |
0.88 (0.64-1.23) |
1.32 (1.00-1.75) |
1.23 (0.95-1.59) |
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Scolnik M, Catoggio LJ, Soriano ER, Wojdyla D, Alvarellos A, Da Silva NA, Borba EF, Sato E, Iglesias-Gamarra A, Guibert-Toledano M, Jacobelli S, Garcia de la Torre I, Sauza del Pozo MJ, Acevedo-Vásquez EM, Esteva-Spinetti MH, Alarcon GS, Pons-Estel B. Influence of Solar Radiation in Cutaneous Manifestations of Lupus: Data from the Gladel Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/influence-of-solar-radiation-in-cutaneous-manifestations-of-lupus-data-from-the-gladel-cohort/. Accessed .« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/influence-of-solar-radiation-in-cutaneous-manifestations-of-lupus-data-from-the-gladel-cohort/