ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0887

Increasing Use of Biologics in Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients in US Clinical Practice: Real-World Observations from Trio Health and the American Rheumatology Network

Simon Helfgott1, Jeremy Broestl2, Kent Kwas Huston3, Deepali Rane2, Jasvinder Singh4, Nehad Soloman5 and Colin Edgerton6, 1BWH- HMS, Boston, MA, 2Trio Health, Louisville, CO, 3Kansas City Physician Partners, Kansas City, MO, 4University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 5Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C., Peoria, AZ, 6Articularis Healthcare, Summerville, SC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treatments include steroids, antimalarials, immunosuppressants and/or biologics, though the use of biologics has been reported as minimal in claim-based studies examining real-world treatment patterns between 2006 to 2016. Here, we examine choice of treatments in the last three years within community rheumatology practices to understand current use of biologics. In addition, we examine persistence to belimumab, the most commonly used biologic for SLE, and association with different treatment and patient characteristics.

Methods: The ARN-TRIO Rheumatology registry contains EMR (fielded and open text), lab, procedure, infusion, medical claims, and specialty pharmacy data generated in care of >75,000 patients by ARN, a network of independent practices with >200 rheumatologists across the US. Data for adult (18+) patients with SLE who initiated or switched to a new treatment (starts) from Jan 2017 to May 2020 were included in this study. Comparisons between groups were made using t-test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fischer’s exact tests for categorical variables. Time to events analyses were conducted by Kaplan-Meier and subsequent log-rank test.

Results: A total of 5,797 SLE patients started 10,913 distinct treatments in the observation window. Comparing starts by drug class between 2017 to 2019 indicated annualized growth rates of 20% for biologics, 7% for immunosuppressants, 2% for steroids, and -2% for antimalarials, with significant differences (p< 0.050) between 2019 and 2017 start percentages for all drug classes except steroids. [FIGURE 1] To compare populations receiving different drug classes, patients were classified into biologic or non-biologic groups based on initial treatment (index). [TABLE 1] At index, 91% (5,272) received non-biologic therapy; 67% (3,884) received antimalarials, 36% (2,098) steroids, and 22% (1,287) immunosuppressants. Patients treated with biologic therapies at index mostly received belimumab (66%, 347/525); rituximab was used for 11% (60/525) of patients. Compared to the non-biologic group, the biologics group differed in use of other drug classes and payer, but not in age, gender, or race. For patients receiving belimumab, the mean time to discontinuation was 838 days (25th percentile = 620 days, median not reached). Time to belimumab discontinuation differed by concomitant use of steroids, antimalarials, or immunosuppressants and these individual associations persisted regardless of the presence of other drug classes. [FIGURE 2] Time to belimumab discontinuation was not associated with age, gender, race, or payer.

Conclusion: The use of biologics has increased considerably since 2017 though these agents are still limited to a fifth of treatment starts. Aside from a slight but significantly higher percentage with commercial coverage, the group initiating biologics was similar to the non-biologic group for patient characteristics. For patients that received belimumab, persistence on therapy was considerable and increased in populations receiving concomitant steroids, antimalarials, or immunosuppressants.

Figure 1: Percentage of patient starts by drug class

Table 1: Patient Characteristics at index

Figure 2: Days to belimumab discontinuation by concurrent drug class


Disclosure: S. Helfgott, Abbvie, 5; J. Broestl, None; K. Huston, None; D. Rane, None; J. Singh, Crealta/Horizon, 1, Medisys, 1, Fidia, 1, UBM LLC, 1, Trio health, 1, Medscape, 1, WebMD, 1, Clinical Care options, 1, Clearview healthcare partners, 1, Putnam associates, 1, Focus forward, 1, Navigant consulting, 1, Spherix, 1, Practice Point communications, 1, the National Institutes of Health, 1, the American College of Rheumatology, 1, Amarin pharmaceuticals, 1, Viking therapeutics, 1, OMERACT, 1; N. Soloman, Horizon, 5, 8, Amgen, 2, 8, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Jannsen, 2, 8, Pfizer, 8, Lilly, 2, GSK, 2, 5, 8; C. Edgerton, Sandoz, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Helfgott S, Broestl J, Huston K, Rane D, Singh J, Soloman N, Edgerton C. Increasing Use of Biologics in Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients in US Clinical Practice: Real-World Observations from Trio Health and the American Rheumatology Network [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/increasing-use-of-biologics-in-treatment-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients-in-us-clinical-practice-real-world-observations-from-trio-health-and-the-american-rheumatology-network/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/increasing-use-of-biologics-in-treatment-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients-in-us-clinical-practice-real-world-observations-from-trio-health-and-the-american-rheumatology-network/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology