ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1690

Increased Sensitivity Οf Τhe New (2017) Αnd Τhe 2012 SLICC As Compared Τo Τhe Acr 1997 Classification Criteria Ιn Early Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): The 2017 Αnd 2012 Criteria May Classify Non-Overlapping Subgroups Οf Patients

Christina Adamichou1, Dionysios Nikolopoulos2, Alessandra Bortoluzzi3, Emmanouil Papastefanakis1, Antonis Fanouriakis2, Eleni Kalogiannaki1, Irini Gergianaki1, Prodromos Sidiropoulos1 and George Bertsias1, 1Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University of Crete, School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece, 24th Department of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece, 3Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara and Azienda Ospedaliera-University Hospital S. Anna, Cona Ferrara, Italy

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: classification criteria, diagnosis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster II: Biomarkers and Outcomes

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: SLE diagnosis can be challenging especially at the early stages, and existing classification criteria are biased towards classifying patients with long-standing disease. A joined ACR/EULAR initiative has introduced a new set of criteria (herein referred to as 2017 criteria), using positive ANA test as an entry criterion coupled with variably-weighed clinical and immunological criteria (Tedeschi et al., 2018). We compared the sensitivity of the 2017 criteria against the SLICC 2012 and ACR 1997 criteria in an early SLE cohort.

Methods: Consecutively registered patients aged ≥15 years diagnosed with SLE during 01/2012-12/2016 by an expert physician and followed-up for ≥6 months in the University Hospitals of Heraklion and “Attikon” (Athens). All sets of criteria (ACR 1997, SLICC 2012, 2017) were applied at the time (± 3 months) of physician-based diagnosis and also at last follow-up. Cases were assessed for disease severity (according to the BILAG definitions and the use of lupus treatments) and the SLICC/ACR organ damage index.

Results: 341 patients were included [91.5% women, 98.8% Caucasian, mean (SD) age at diagnosis 42.1 (15.3) years] with mean disease duration 32.3 (SD 18.2) months. At the time of diagnosis, more patients were classified with the 2017 criteria (79.5%), followed by the SLICC (75.4%) and the ACR (67.2%) criteria. A total 39 patients (11.4%) met only the 2017 criteria and 25 patients (7.3%) met only the SLICC criteria. The former had increased frequency of fever, synovitis, anti-dsDNA or anti-Sm autoantibodies. In contrast, SLICC-only classified patients had increased rates of chronic cutaneous lupus, alopecia, mouth ulcers, haematological disease, anti-phospholipid antibodies and hypocomplementemia (Table 1). At last follow-up, the sensitivity of the 2017, SLICC and ACR criteria were 84.5%, 89.4% and 78.6%, respectively. Among 25 patients (7.3%) who were ANA negative, thus failing to meet the entry criterion, 23 scored above the threshold of ≥10 points in the 2017 criteria. Patients classified according to the 2017 criteria did not differ from SLICC-classified patients regarding disease severity (mild/moderate/severe: 46.5%/33.7%/19.8% vs. 46.2%/33.8%/20.0%, respectively) and organ damage.

Conclusion: Both the 2017 and the 2012 SLICC criteria are more sensitive than the ACR criteria in classifying early SLE. The new criteria enable the classification of more patients with synovitis and positive autoantibodies whereas the SLICC criteria have increased sensitivity for hematologic disease, suggesting that they may need to be combined to assure maximum capture of patients for clinical trials. The majority of ANA-negative patients scored above the 2017 classification threshold, suggesting that inclusion of ANA as an additional item (instead of entry criterion) could further enhance the sensitivity of the new SLE criteria at early stages.

Table 1. Prevalence of each manifestation included in the SLICC 2012 criteria and the 2017 criteria, in patients who fulfil only the SLICC or the 2017 criteria at the time of SLE diagnosis.

Time of SLE diagnosis according to physician

Fulfilling only SLICC 2012 (%)

Fulfilling only 2017 criteria (%)

No of patients (%)

25 (7.3%)

39 (11.4%)

SLICC 2012 items

acLE/scLE

72%

74.4%

cdcLE

24%

10.2%

Non-scarring alopecia

52%

20.5%

Mucosal ulcers

44%

7.7%

Synovitis

52%

94.9%

Serositis

8%

10.2%

Renal disorder

4%

2.6%

Neurologic disorder

4%

7.7%

Haemolytic anemia

12%

2.5%

Leukopenia

36%

25.6%

Thrombocytopenia

28%

12.8%

Anti-dsDNA

4%

15.4%

Anti-Smith

0

5.1%

aPL

20%

7.7%

Low complement

40%

17.9%

Coombs test

8%

2.5%

ANA

84%

100%

Biopsy-proven nephritis

4%

2.5%

2017 criteria items

ANA (entry criterion)

84%

100%

Constitutional

4%

12.8%

Alopecia or ulcers

56%

23.1%

acLE

48%

74.3%

scLE or DLE

16%

7.7%

Synovitis

52%

94.9%

Delirium

0

0

Psychosis

0

0

Seizures

0

2.5%

Acute pericarditis

12%

2.5%

Serositis

0

5.1%

Leukopenia

20%

25.6%

Thrombocytopenia or hemolysis

32%

15.4%

Proteinuria

0

0

Class III or IV LN

0

2.5%

Class II or V LN

4%

0

aPL

20%

5.1%

Low C3 or low C4

24%

7.7%

Low C3 and low C4

16%

10.2%

Anti-dsDNA or anti-Smith

4%

20.5%


Disclosure: C. Adamichou, None; D. Nikolopoulos, None; A. Bortoluzzi, None; E. Papastefanakis, None; A. Fanouriakis, None; E. Kalogiannaki, None; I. Gergianaki, None; P. Sidiropoulos, None; G. Bertsias, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Adamichou C, Nikolopoulos D, Bortoluzzi A, Papastefanakis E, Fanouriakis A, Kalogiannaki E, Gergianaki I, Sidiropoulos P, Bertsias G. Increased Sensitivity Οf Τhe New (2017) Αnd Τhe 2012 SLICC As Compared Τo Τhe Acr 1997 Classification Criteria Ιn Early Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): The 2017 Αnd 2012 Criteria May Classify Non-Overlapping Subgroups Οf Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/increased-sensitivity-%ce%bff-%cf%84he-new-2017-%ce%b1nd-%cf%84he-2012-slicc-as-compared-%cf%84o-%cf%84he-acr-1997-classification-criteria-%ce%b9n-early-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-the-2017/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/increased-sensitivity-%ce%bff-%cf%84he-new-2017-%ce%b1nd-%cf%84he-2012-slicc-as-compared-%cf%84o-%cf%84he-acr-1997-classification-criteria-%ce%b9n-early-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-the-2017/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology