ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2060

Increased Risk of Adverse Renal Outcomes in Patients of African Ancestry with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) – Role of APOL1

Gul Karakoc, Ge Liu, Jorge Gamboa, Cecilia Chung, Jonathan Mosley, Michael Stein and Vivian Kawai, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: genetics, race/ethnicity, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster III: Outcomes

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: SLE disproportionately affects individuals of African (AA) compared to European ancestry (EA). In addition to a higher incidence, the disease is more severe in patients of AA; they have a higher burden of renal comorbidities such as end stage renal disease (ESRD) and others (1). A high risk (HR) genotype in apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1), present in 13% of AA and absent in EA individuals, is associated with increased risk of renal and hypertensive disorders in populations of AA. APOL1 expression is driven by interferon and the HR genotype is more common in patients with lupus nephritis (LN)-ESRD. We examined the hypothesis that the APOL1 HR genotype is responsible for the increased prevalence of renal comorbidities in SLE patients of AA compared to those of EA.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients with SLE of EA and AA at a tertiary hospital using de-identified genetic and electronic health record (EHR) data. Ancestry was defined by principal components (PCs) and HapMap references. We assessed the prevalence of clinical conditions in the EHR using ICD9 and ICD10 diagnosis codes. Highest serum creatinine was extracted as a measure of renal function. Genotyping was performed with the Illumina Infinium® Expanded Multi-Ethnic Genotyping Array to define APOL1 risk genotypes: HR genotypes were defined as G1/G1, G2/G2, or G1/G2 and low risk as carriers of 1 or 0 copies of the G1 or G2 alleles. The prevalence of clinical disorders was compared in patients with SLE:  EA vs. all AA; EA vs. AA excluding those with the APOL1 HR genotype (with a PheWAS approach), and AA APOL1 HR vs low risk (LR) genotypes (with logistic regression for selected diagnoses). Covariates included sex, year of birth, age at SLE diagnosis, follow-up in the EHR, and 5 PCs.

Results: We studied 784 patients with SLE; 25% were of AA. The APOL1 HR genotype was absent in patients of EA and present in 27 (13.8%) patients of AA. Patients of AA were younger, diagnosed at earlier age, had a higher prevalence of LN, and had higher peak creatinine levels compared to EA patients; however, in APOL1 HR and LR genotypes, only the difference in the prevalence of LN (52% vs. 35%, respectively) approached statistical significance (Table 1). In the PheWAS, 16 diagnoses were significantly more common in AA than EA patients (P≤ 5E-05, Fig 1A); all these diagnoses were renal or renal-related. Excluding individuals with the APOL1 HR genotype had minor effects on the comparison between EA and AA patients; 11 of the 16 diagnoses remained more common in AA than EA patients at phenome-wide significance (P≤5E-05, Fig. 1B), and the remaining 5 diagnoses had P< 0.0002. In patients of AA, none of the 16 renal-related diagnoses of interest were significantly higher in patients with the HR genotype (P >0.05).

Conclusion: In SLE, the higher prevalence of renal and hypertensive disorders in those of AA compared to EA was not explained by the presence of APOL1B high risk variants.

Reference

1. Barnado A, et al. Phenome-wide association study identifies marked increased in burden of comorbidities in African Americans with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20:69.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Characteristics of the study population by ancestry and by APOL1 risk genotype

Supporting image 2

Figure 1: Clinical diagnoses associated with African ancestry compared to European ancestry in patients with SLE before (A) and after (B) excluding AA individuals with APOL1 high risk genotype. The red horizontal line represents the phenome-wide significance threshold (P≤5.0E-05). Triangles represent clinical diagnoses that are labeled by their respective phecode (see below). Triangles pointing upward represent increased risk for African ancestry


Disclosures: G. Karakoc, None; G. Liu, None; J. Gamboa, None; C. Chung, None; J. Mosley, None; M. Stein, None; V. Kawai, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Karakoc G, Liu G, Gamboa J, Chung C, Mosley J, Stein M, Kawai V. Increased Risk of Adverse Renal Outcomes in Patients of African Ancestry with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) – Role of APOL1 [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/increased-risk-of-adverse-renal-outcomes-in-patients-of-african-ancestry-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-role-of-apol1/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/increased-risk-of-adverse-renal-outcomes-in-patients-of-african-ancestry-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-role-of-apol1/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology