ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1994

Incorporation of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Curriculum and 6-Month Assessment of Knowledge Retention into the 2nd Year of Medical Student Training

Kiley Toder1, William Rennie2, Ruth L. Marder3 and Maria L. Barilla-LaBarca2,4, 1Medicine/ Rheumatology, Northshore LIJ, Great Neck, NY, 2Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, 3Rheumatology, North Shore LIJ Health System, Great Neck, NY, 4Rheumatology, Hofstra North Shore LIJ Health System, Great Neck, NY

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Medical education and ultrasonography

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Education (ACR)

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose
Few medical schools offer a formal curriculum in musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS); the success of such a program in terms of skills and knowledge acquisition and durability of response has not been clearly documented. The purpose of this study was to assess second year students’ ability to identify the presence of pre-loaded suprapatellar effusions using a cadaver model following a formal MSUS curriculum and assess their skill and knowledge retention rate at 6 months.

Methods

As part of a longitudinal US curriculum at Hofstra NSLIJ SOM, 3 sessions were reserved for MSUS during the 2nd year of study. There were pre-assigned readings prior to each session. The 1st session reviewed probe selection, patient positioning, and recognition of tissues (tendon, muscle, bone, cartilage, etc). The 2nd session demonstrated normal and pathologic knee anatomy on a cadaveric model. Multiple choice question style pre-assessment was given prior to this session. In the 3rd session, students performed a standard knee US exam with the guidance of MSUS-trained faculty.  The summative assessment evaluated the students’ ability to perform a standard knee exam, label knee anatomy on acquired images, and identify a suprapatellar “effusion” in a cadaver preinjected with a gelatin mixture. This exercise was repeated 6 months later in a smaller, voluntary group of students to assess retention of skills and knowledge. 

Results

In the pre-assessment 22/57 (38.5%) students correctly identified the US image with a knee effusion although only 2 students could label it correctly compared to 37/57 (67%) in the summative assessment (p= .003 correct answer and p<.0001 labeling).  Thirteen students volunteered to participate in the 6 month extension; they did not prepare in advance nor have significant opportunities for MSK US in the intervening months.  Eleven of these students (84.6%) had identified the anatomy and 10 (76.9%) had identified the effusion during the summative assessment in December.  In June, a decrease in both knowledge (table) and skills (84.6% of images were of poor quality or taken in non-standard locations) was found although the majority (61.5%) was still able to identify the pathology. 

Conclusion
Following a formal MSUS curriculum, the majority of the 2nd year medical students were able to demonstrate their skill in the acquisition of images, distinguish pathologic from normal findings, and identify knee structures by US. However the retention rate for quality images and identifying anatomical structures decreased at 6 months.   Yet, a majority of students identified fluid and bone in the knee that helped to obtain their respective images and assess the location and nature of the effusion. Thus, although anatomy would have to be further reinforced, student’s identification of effusions was durable at 6 months.

 


Disclosure:

K. Toder,
None;

W. Rennie,
None;

R. L. Marder,
None;

M. L. Barilla-LaBarca,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/incorporation-of-musculoskeletal-ultrasound-curriculum-and-6-month-assessment-of-knowledge-retention-into-the-2nd-year-of-medical-student-training/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology