ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1218

Incidence Of and Risk Factors For Clinical Fractures In Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Matched Controls: A Population-Based Study In The United Kingdom

Irene Bultink1, Nicholas Harvey2, Arief Lalmohamed3,4, Cyrus Cooper5, Willem Lems6, Tjeerd Van Staa2,3,7 and Frank de Vries3,4,8,9, 1Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2University of Southampton, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton, United Kingdom, 3Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, 4Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 5NDORMS; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom, 6Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 7Medicine and Helathcare Products Regulatory Agency, Clinical Practice Research Datalink, London, United Kingdom, 8Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, Netherlands, 9Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Fracture risk, fractures, glucocorticoids, osteoporosis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease: Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been associated with an increased risk of low bone mineral density and fractures. However, data on absolute fracture risk and risk factors associated with clinical fractures are very scarce. The purpose of the present study was to estimate incidence rates of clinical fractures in patients with SLE and relative risks compared with matched controls, and to evaluate risk factors associated with fractures in SLE.

Methods:

We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (from 1987 to 2012). Each SLE patient (n=4343) was matched with up to 6 controls (n=21780) by age and sex. Fracture type was stratified according to WHO definitions into osteoporotic fracture (clinical spine, hip, forearm, or humerus) and non-osteoporotic fracture. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate relative rates (RR) of fracture, and time interaction terms to evaluate fracture timing patterns. Incidence rates of fractures in SLE patients, stratified by age, gender, type of fracture, disease duration, and therapy variables, were compared with fracture rates in controls.

Results:

Mean age was 46.7 years. Follow-up duration was 6.4 years in SLE patients and 6.6 years in matched controls. Overall, SLE patients had an increased risk of any fracture compared to controls, after adjustment for confounders (adj RR 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.42), and the risk further increased with a longer disease duration. Glucocorticoid (GC) use in the previous six months raised the risk of any fracture (adj RR 1.27; 95% CI 1.02-1.58), but was not further increased with higher cumulative GC exposure. A similar pattern was found for osteoporotic fracture, but did not reach statistical significance (adj RR 1.23; 95% CI 0.91-1.67). Use of antimalarials was not associated with an altered fracture risk. Cerebrovascular events, seizures, and (as expected) previous osteoporotic fractures were identified as significant predictors for any and osteoporotic fractures (Table 1).

Conclusion:

SLE patients in the United Kingdom have an increased risk of clinical fractures compared to age- and sex-matched controls. GC use in the previous six months and longer disease duration are important factors associated with the increased fracture risk in SLE. In addition, special attention should be paid to lupus patients with neuropsychiatric organ damage or a history of osteoporotic fractures since these subgroups of patients are at high risk of the occurrence of (subsequent) fractures.

Table 1. Risk of fracture within SLE patients (n=4343), stratified according to organ damage. (reference = no risk factor)

 

Any fracture

Osteoporotic fracture

 

Events

Adj RR (95% CI)*

Events

Adj RR (95% CI)*

Cognitive impairment

5

1.67 (0.68-4.08)

4

2.25 (0.82-6.16)

Seizures

34

2.01 (1.41-2.86)

22

2.81 (1.80-4.40)

Cerebrovascular event

55

1.49 (1.12-2.00)

35

1.77 (1.22-2.57)

Renal disease

54

1.30 (0.96-1.75)

32

1.35 (0.91-2.00)

Previous osteoporotic fracture

172

4.26 (3.49-5.18)

95

3.85 (2.92-5.07)

Diabetes

21

1.39 (0.89-2.17)

11

1.33 (0.72-2.45)

Malignancy

50

1.23 (0.91-1.68)

28

1.22 (0.81-1.84)

 *Adjusted for: previous fracture, use of glucocorticoids, antimalarials, calcium/vitamin D supplements, benzodiazepines, and proton pump inhibitors in the previous 6 months.


Disclosure:

I. Bultink,

Servier Laboratories,

9,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

9;

N. Harvey,

Alliance for Better Bone Health, The ALR;,

2,

Amgen,

2,

Eli Lilly and Company,

2,

Proctor and Gamble,

2,

Nycomed,

2,

Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical,

2,

Shire,

2,

Servier Laboratories,

2;

A. Lalmohamed,
None;

C. Cooper,

Amgen,

5,

GlaxoSmithKline,

5,

Alliance for Better Bone Health, The ALR,

5,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Eli Lilly and Company,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

5,

Servier Laboratories,

5,

Medtronic,

5,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5;

W. Lems,

Amgen,

9,

Eli Lilly and Company,

9,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

9,

Servier Laboratories,

9,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

9,

Will Pharma,

9,

Takeda,

9;

T. Van Staa,
None;

F. de Vries,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/incidence-of-and-risk-factors-for-clinical-fractures-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-matched-controls-a-population-based-study-in-the-united-kingdom/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology