ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2037

Incidence and Prevalence of Myasthenia Gravis in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with and without Treatment Compared with the General Population

Neil Accortt1, Mary Anthony1, Jennifer Schenfeld2, Travis Wheeling2, Anna Hassebroek2, Cynthia O'Malley1 and Michael Sprafka1, 1Center for Observational Research, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 2Docs Global, Inc, North Wales, PA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: outcomes, population studies, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health (ACR): Rheumatoid Arthritis Pathogenesis and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: There is a dearth of information on the incidence rate of myasthenia gravis (MG) in the US and specifically among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.  RA patients have been shown to be at risk for other autoimmune diseases so we sought to describe the rate of MG among RA patients, with and without treatment.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using an administrative claims database. There were 8 study cohorts: General population (GP); incident RA population regardless of treatment; and 6 RA sub-cohorts defined by treatment exposure. Inclusion criteria included a minimum of 2 years of continuous enrollment with pharmacy coverage between 01/01/2005 – 12/31/2011. To ensure incident RA, patients could not have any RA claims during the first 12 months of enrollment. RA patients were followed forward and assigned to exposure sub-cohorts: Untreated (RA-U), 3 cohorts of different disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (RA-DMARDS1, RA-DMARDS2, RA-DMARDS3); TNF-inhibitors (RA-TNF); and other biologic therapies (RA-OB).  Patients could be in ≥ 1 sub-cohort. MG diagnosis was captured using diagnostic and procedure claims.  Prevalent MG cases in the GP and RA cohorts were identified during the first 12 months of enrollment. Follow-up for GP began on day 366 following enrollment; for RA and RA-U it began on date they met the criterion for RA diagnosis, and for RA sub-cohorts it began on medication start date.  Follow-up continued until MG diagnosis, disenrollment from the database, end of study, and for the sub-cohorts, 90 days after discontinuation or switch in treatment.  Incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals per 100,000 person years were estimated for MG, excluding prevalent cases. Incidence and prevalence estimates were age- and sex- standardized to the GP.

Results: The mean age and sex distribution were 37.1 years and 52% female for GP and 56.3 years and 74% female for RA. Gender and age distributions in the RA sub-cohorts were similar to RA. Prevalence of MG was 24.3 per 100,000 in the GP cohort and 86.8 per 100,000 in the RA cohort while the incidence was 10.4 per 100,000 and 35.8 per 100,000 in the GP and RA cohorts, respectively.  MG incidence was highest in the RA DMARD3 (azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, gold salts or penicillamine) sub-cohort. Due to the small number of MG cases, there was no discernable incidence pattern in the other sub-cohorts. Sensitivity analyses allowing for different follow-up times or using different algorithms to define MG showed little difference in the results.

Conclusion: As with other autoimmune diseases, subjects with RA appear to be at a higher risk from MG than the general population. We found both the prevalence and incidence of MG to be 3-4 times higher among RA patients compared to GP, however, with the exception of the RA DMARD-3 cohort, treatment did not appear to influence the incidence of MG following RA diagnosis.

Table 1.  Cases, exposure, incidence rates of Myasthenia Gravis

 

GP

RA

RA Untreated

RA DMARD 1a

RA DMARD 2b

RA DMARD 3c

RA TNFd

RA OBe

N of Pts at Risk

42,888,651

101,180

33,820

36,640

43,115

9,972

21,920

3,550

PYE

122,274,542

298,174

73,592

51,781

68,168

8,215

36,193

3,697

No of Cases

6,532

72

22

20

20

17

11

3

Incidence ratef

10.4

35.8

52.7

91.9

38.8

219.1

37.3

52.2

   (95% CI)

(10.1 , 10.6)

(21.2 , 50.3)

(3.8 , 101.6)

(17.0 , 166.8)

(16.1 , 61.5)

(81.7 , 356.5)

(12.4 , 62.1)

(-8.6 , 112.9)

Footnote:

a. RA pts had at least 1 prescription for chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, or  sulfasalazine

b. RA pts had at least 1 prescription for  methotrexate, leflunomide or Tofacitinib

c. RA pts had at least 1 prescription for azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, gold salts (auranofin, aurothioglucose), or penicillamine

d.  RA pts had at least 1 prescription for certolizumab pergol, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, etanercept

e. RA pts had at least 1 prescription for abatacept, anakinra, rituximab or tocilizumab

f. Incidence Rate per 100,000 person-years, Age- and Sex- adjusted & Weighted to the Total MarketScan Population


Disclosure:

N. Accortt,

Amgen, Inc.,

3,

Amgen, Inc.,

1;

M. Anthony,

Amgen, Inc.,

1,

Amgen, Inc.,

3;

J. Schenfeld,

Amgen, Inc.,

5;

T. Wheeling,

Amgen, Inc,

5;

A. Hassebroek,

Amgen, Inc.,

5;

C. O’Malley,

Amgen, Inc.,

1,

Amgen, Inc.,

3;

M. Sprafka,

Amgen, Inc.,

1,

Amgen, Inc.,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/incidence-and-prevalence-of-myasthenia-gravis-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-with-and-without-treatment-compared-with-the-general-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology