ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1514

Inadequate Response Within a Year of Biologic and Oral Synthetic DMARD Treatment Initiation Among Psoriatic Arthritis Patients in the USA Real-World Setting

Shannon Grabich 1, Anna Sheahan1, Owen Davies 2 and Robert Suruki 1, 1UCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC, 2UCB Pharma, Slough, England, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: psoriatic arthritis and Biologics

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis & Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Real-world biologic persistence in PsA patients is lower compared to persistence in clinical trials. A comprehensive description of patterns of inadequate response (IR) to treatment is lacking. Frequency and timing of IR to biologics in the 1st year of treatment among PsA patients is described in this study.

Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed USA commercial claims data (IBM® MarketScan®) from 2012–2017. Eligible PsA patients were biologic naïve (no claims for ≥1 year), ≥18 years old, with continuous enrollment in the database in the 12-month baseline and follow-up periods. Diagnoses were based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9/10 codes. Index date was the 1st claim for a biologic or apremilast (small molecule; Table). Persistence was defined as treatment with the index biologic with gaps of ≤90 days over 12 months. IR was defined as follows: 110% of the label-recommended dose for ≥30 days (above-label dosing), new biologic initiation within 90 days of discontinuing index biologic (switch), addition of a corticosteroid/immunosuppressant/biologic with ≥30 days of overlap (add-on treatment), and index biologic cessation ( >90 days with no treatment) (non-switch discontinuation). Patients were classified according to the first IR event experienced.

Results: A total of 7,236 patients met the inclusion criteria. Persistence at 12 months was 48%, and was higher in males (53%) vs females (44%). Seventy-one percent of patients experienced an IR event in follow-up; the most frequent events were non-switch discontinuation (30%), followed by above-label dosing (16%), biologic switch (14%) and add-on treatment (11%). Median time from treatment initiation to IR event was 4.0 months, and was shortest for add-on treatment (3.1 months) and longest for biologic switch (4.6 months). Among the 1,716 patients with ≥12 months of follow-up after non-switch discontinuation, 53% had no subsequent biologic in the following 12 months, 31% restarted the index biologic, and 16% started a new biologic. IR distribution was similar irrespective of comorbid psoriasis and most recent provider (rheumatologist/dermatologist/other). Females (n=4,036) were more likely to experience an IR event than males (n=3,200) (74% vs 66%). Median time to IR event in females was 3.9 months vs 4.4 months in males.

Conclusion: IR to first biologic treatment, comprised primarily of adalimumab and etanercept, is common in PsA. Female patients are more likely to experience an IR event and to experience an event sooner vs males. Index biologic discontinuation (for >90 days) is common, with half of discontinuers remaining without a biologic exposure for ≥1 year, while the remaining discontinuers appeared to be taking a biologic drug holiday before restarting or initiating a new biologic. These variable treatment patterns suggest a variety of factors (including IR and others) are driving biologic discontinuation. Analysis of patient-level factors, such as clinical response and treatment access, is necessary to better understand the drivers of IR and to improve real-world treatment persistence. 


Disclosure: S. Grabich, UCB Pharma, 1, 3; A. Sheahan, UCB Pharma, 1, 3; O. Davies, UCB Pharma, 1, 3; R. Suruki, UCB Pharma, 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Grabich S, Sheahan A, Davies O, Suruki R. Inadequate Response Within a Year of Biologic and Oral Synthetic DMARD Treatment Initiation Among Psoriatic Arthritis Patients in the USA Real-World Setting [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/inadequate-response-within-a-year-of-biologic-and-oral-synthetic-dmard-treatment-initiation-among-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-in-the-usa-real-world-setting/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/inadequate-response-within-a-year-of-biologic-and-oral-synthetic-dmard-treatment-initiation-among-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-in-the-usa-real-world-setting/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology