ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1611

In Vitro Cellular Profiling of Sirukumab, an Anti–IL-6 Cytokine Monoclonal Antibody, Reveals a Distinct Phenotypic Signature Compared to Tocilizumab, an Anti–IL-6 Receptor Monoclonal Antibody

Konstantia-Maria Chavele1, Debbie Gardner2, Matthew J Loza2, Bidisha Dasgupta2, Martin Sims1, David Shealy2, Juliet Reid1 and Ravi Rao1, 1GSK Medicines Research Centre, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom, 2Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biologics and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  IL-6 plays a central pathogenic role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). IL-6 signals through a complex of transmembrane IL-6R or soluble IL-6R (sIL-6R) with gp130 to mediate classic or trans-signaling, respectively. Sirukumab (CNTO 136) is a human IgG1 k monoclonal antibody (mAb) specific for human IL-6 cytokine and is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of adults with moderately to severely active RA and other diseases. A human primary cell-based phenotypic screening systems (BioMAP®) was used to investigate the effects of sirukumab and to identify discriminating biological activities compared to tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6R mAb. Comparisons were also made with a reference database that includes profiles of drugs used to treat RA.

Methods:  BioMAP® systems model disease biology in primary human cells. Sirukumab was profiled across a panel of 12 BioMAP® systems, relevant to inflammatory diseases, at different concentrations in the presence or absence of sIL-6R (50ng/ml). Sirukumab profiles were directly compared to those of tocilizumab and indirectly to compounds already profiled in the BioMAP® reference database including adalimumab, tofacinitib, methotrexate and prednisolone in the presence or absence of sIL-6R. Serum samples from the RA phase 3 sirukumab studies (SIRROUND-M, D, T, & H) were also analyzed at baseline and week 4 post-treatment using the SomaLogic SOMAscanTM.

Results:  Sirukumab significantly inhibited expression of biomarkers linked to inflammation (P-selectin), immunomodulation (CD69, M-CSF) and tissue remodeling (MMP-9, aSMA, Collagen IV) in the BioMAP® systems. Addition of sIL-6R induced further biomarkers that sirukumab completely blocked. A direct comparison of sirukumab to tocilizumab showed that whilst there was a similar impact on multiple mediators, there were significant differences across all systems assessed. Sirukumab significantly decreased 5 (CD40, Collagen III & IV, TF, PAI-I) and increased 8 (IL-8, ICAM-1, IL-1a, IP-10, IL-2, EGFR, MIG, IL-10) biomarkers under sIL-6R trans-signaling; these mediators were not affected by tocilizumab. Conversely, tocilizumab significantly decreased 9 (P-selectin, uPAP, IL-18, MMP3, EGFR, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1a E-selectin) and increased 1 (VCAM-1) biomarkers which were not affected by sirukumab. Of note, the serum analysis of RA patients treated with sirukumab confirmed some of the changes seen in the BioMAP® systems, including reduction of PAI-I, increase in IP-10, and lack of decrease in MMP3, MCP-1, MIP-1a, and E-selectin levels. Indirect comparisons of sirukumab to adalimumab, tofacinitib, methotrexate and prednisolone using the BioMAP® algorithm showed that overall the drugs were not similar, reflecting different mechanisms of action.

Conclusion:  Sirukumab has a unique BioMAP® phenotypic signature that is further separated from tocilizumab (as well as other reference profiles) with addition of sIL-6R. This signature was confirmed in sera from RA patients treated with sirukumab supporting the hypothesis that the impact of sirukumab on IL-6R signaling is distinct from tocilizumab. The clinical significance of these data requires further experimental exploration.


Disclosure: K. M. Chavele, GSK Medicines Research Centre, 3; D. Gardner, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; M. J. Loza, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; B. Dasgupta, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; M. Sims, GSK Medicines Research Centre, 3; D. Shealy, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; J. Reid, GSK Medicines Research Centre, 3; R. Rao, GSK Medicines Research Centre, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chavele KM, Gardner D, Loza MJ, Dasgupta B, Sims M, Shealy D, Reid J, Rao R. In Vitro Cellular Profiling of Sirukumab, an Anti–IL-6 Cytokine Monoclonal Antibody, Reveals a Distinct Phenotypic Signature Compared to Tocilizumab, an Anti–IL-6 Receptor Monoclonal Antibody [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/in-vitro-cellular-profiling-of-sirukumab-an-anti-il-6-cytokine-monoclonal-antibody-reveals-a-distinct-phenotypic-signature-compared-to-tocilizumab-an-anti-il-6-receptor-monoclonal-a/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/in-vitro-cellular-profiling-of-sirukumab-an-anti-il-6-cytokine-monoclonal-antibody-reveals-a-distinct-phenotypic-signature-compared-to-tocilizumab-an-anti-il-6-receptor-monoclonal-a/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology