ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1619

In Vitro Assessments Of Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Lupus Patients To Predict Suppressive Function In Vivo

Erin Collins1, Fei Gu2 and Gary S. Gilkeson3, 1Medicine/Rheumatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 2Division of Rheumatology and Immunology,Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 3Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Mesenchymal stem cells and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-Human Etiology and Pathogenesis: Genetics and Genomics

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Broad immune suppression by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) make them an attractive candidate as a cell therapy for autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).  MSCs can be derived from various sources and vary slightly depending on the source of origin.  Currently the source of MSCs that will be most effective in ameliorating SLE is unknown.  Moreover, in vivo studies have suggested that lupus derived MSCs are not as effective as MSCs from non-diseased sources.  In this study we assess the suppressive capabilities of MSCs from different sources in vitro.

Methods: To determine the suppressive efficacy of human MSCs we harvested MSCs from healthy donor umbilical cords, bone marrow, and lupus patient bone marrow (n=3-4 of each).  Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from healthy individuals and used immediately for cell culture.  PBMCs were labeled with CFSE for detection of suppression.  PBMCs (5×105) were then stimulated with 1μg/ml αCD3/CD28 and co-cultured with varying dilutions of MSCs.  Co-cultures were incubated for 72 hours before cells were collected for flow cytometry and qPCR analysis.  MSC activation was assessed by stimulating 1×105 MSCs with varying concentrations of IFNγ and incubating for 24 hours.  Expression of MSC activation/suppressive markers was assessed by qPCR.

Results:  In comparison to MSCs from healthy donors, lupus MSCs were able to suppress PBMCs equally well.  Only a modest decrease in suppression was seen when lupus MSCs were diluted 1:40 (MSC:PBMC), when compared to healthy MSCs.  We next examined the expression of markers that are important for suppressive MSCs.  Our data showed increased expression of IDO1, CFH, TGFβ and IL6 in lupus MSCs compared to healthy MSCs during PBMC co-culture.  To determine whether lupus MSCs were more readily activated for suppression, we activated the various MSCs with graded doses of IFNγ.  We found that IDO1 and CFH were upregulated in a dose dependant manner similarly in both lupus and healthy MSCs.  However, lupus MSCS had higher expression of IL6, TGFB and T cell attractant chemokines (CXCL9 and CXCL10) when compared to healthy MSCs.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that lupus MSCs are equally as suppressive as healthy MSCs in vitro.  Additionally, certain standard suppressive markers are up regulated in lupus MSCs.  Although our in vitro assessments do not show that lupus MSCs are defective, these results do not correlate with in vivo studies showing reduced capacity of lupus MSCs to mediate disease.  Moreover, our studies suggest that different in vitro evaluations need to be utilized to determine in vivo effectiveness of MSCs.


Disclosure:

E. Collins,
None;

F. Gu,
None;

G. S. Gilkeson,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/in-vitro-assessments-of-mesenchymal-stem-cells-from-lupus-patients-to-predict-suppressive-function-in-vivo/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology