ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2305

Improving Screening for Hyperlipidemia in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis at an Academic Rheumatology Practice

Ashwini Komarla1 and Alexis Ogdie2, 1Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2Rheumatology and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lipids, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and risk assessment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) population. However, cardiovascular risk factors such as hyperlipidemia are undertreated in patients with RA compared to other high risk groups like diabetics. We examined the effectiveness of two interventions to increase screening for hyperlipidemia among patients with RA within the rheumatology practice of an academic medical center.

Methods

Interventions included a web-based survey regarding attitudes towards lipid screening in patients with RA sent to physicians in the division of rheumatology at the University of Pennsylvania on 1/6/14 and posters and flyers about cardiovascular risk in inflammatory arthritis posted in each clinic’s check-in area and exam rooms between 2/1-2/28/14. A query of our electronic health record was used to generate a list of patient visits with an ICD-9 code for RA seen in the practice between 7/1/13 – 4/15/14. Charts were reviewed for a random sample of 100 patient visits for the periods before and after the interventions (7/1 – 1/5/14 and 2/1 – 4/15/14 respectively). Patients were excluded if the rheumatologist had not documented a diagnosis of RA in the encounter note. If multiple visits for the same patient were found in the sample, the last visit in that period was used. The outcome was achieved if lipid screening was documented as performed in the encounter note or if results were recorded in the encounter note or in the laboratory section within 3 years of the visit date. The prevalence of up to date lipid screening in each period was assessed, and the groups were compared using the chi-squared test.

Results

Seventy-eight patients in the pre-intervention group and 82 in the post-intervention group satisfied inclusion criteria. Demographics are listed in the Table. Lipid screening was considered up to date in 39 of the 78 patients (50.0%) in the pre-intervention group and 57 out of the 82 patients (69.5 %) in the post-intervention group (p=0.01).

Conclusion

Among patients with RA, the management of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including lipid screening, is suboptimal. Flyers and posters increased the prevalence of documented lipid screening in the short term. The survey of physician attitudes towards lipid screening likely also increased awareness of practice patterns among rheumatologists. Further quality improvement initiatives are needed to identify long term solutions to improve the recognition and management of traditional cardiovascular risk factors among patients with RA.  

Table. Demographics of the Pre and Post Intervention Groups

 

 

Before

N= 78

After

N=82

Practice

Presbyterian Medical Center

15

24

 

Perelman Center

61

51

 

Fellows’ Clinic

2

7

Age- Median (Range)

 

60 (27-89)

60 (32-87)

Gender

Female

63 (81%)

74 (90%)

Primary Care Physician Location

Outside of the University of Pennsylvania System

53 (68%)

44 (53%)

Diabetes

 

12 (15%)

16 (20%)

Disease Activity

Not Recorded

4

7

 

Remission

23

23

 

Low

18

27

 

Moderate

24

20

 

High

9

5

Lipid Lowering Drugs Used

Statin

22

23

 

Fish oil/ Omega-3-acid ethyl esters

12

9

 

Flaxseed oil

2

1

 

Ezetimibe

1

1

 

Fenofibrate

1

1

Service Ordering Lipid

Screening

Primary Care

19

35

Rheumatology

11

17

 

Cardiology

6

2

 

Endocrine

0

2

 

Inpatient Medicine

0

1

 

Oncology

1

0

 

Renal

1

0

 

Not Clear

1

0


Disclosure:

A. Komarla,
None;

A. Ogdie,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-screening-for-hyperlipidemia-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-at-an-academic-rheumatology-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology